Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are cystic tumours of the pancreas.
These tumours are most frequently identified in older patients (50-60 years of age) 6. Main duct type (see below) appears to present a decade or so earlier on average than branch duct type 5. There may be a slight female predilection 7.
Clinical presentation can be difficult to distinguish from chronic pancreatitis with repeated acute exacerbations. Endocrine dysfunction with new onset of diabetes mellitus has also been reported 5.
IPMNs are one of a number of mucinous tumours of the pancreas, and can be further divided both histologically and with respect to their macroscopic appearance 5. They are uncommon ductal epithelial tumours comprising approximately 10-15% of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.
They are histologically divided into
- borderline malignant
- intraductal papillary mucinous adenocarcinoma
- reminiscent of chronic pancreatitis
- segmental or diffuse distribution
- highest malignant potential 6
branch duct type
- mostly seen in the head and uncinate process
- more localised and mass-like
- may be macro or microcystic in appearance 5
- typically indolent behaviour 6
- mixed type lesions
Solid components are suspicious of malignant transformation.
The characteristic feature is that these tumours communicate with the pancreatic duct or branches, which helps to distinguish these tumours from mucinous cystadenoma / cystadenocarcinoma which do not.
In some cases, the tumour is very localised and appears cystic. It can therefore be difficult to distinguish from peripheral mucinous cystadenoma / cystadenocarcinoma unless convincing communication with the duct system can be demonstrated.
They do not calcify.
- main duct IPMN (with dilatation of main duct >5 mm)
- either segments of the pancreatic duct (or the entire duct) are dilated and filled with low density (mucin thus water density) material
- overlying pancreatic parenchyma may be thinned
- if proximal, the distal pancreatic duct may be dilated without direct involvement (cystic neoplasms can have a similar appearance)
- solid mural nodules are concerning for malignant transformation, and appear as hyperdense nodules protruding into the mucin-filled dilated ducts
- enhancing nodules following administration of contrast are very concerning
- occasionally mucinous material can be seen to bulge out of a dilated ampulla of Vater (uncommon but essentially pathognomonic)
- branch duct IPMN
- the majority of the gland is normal in appearance, except for a single or multiple side branches demonstrating marked dilatation
- cystic mass-like appearance which often mimicks cystic tumours of the pancreas
- its appearance has been termed a bunch of grapes due to its appearance
- microcystic variety has appearances similar to serous cystadenomas, but again communication with the main pancreatic duct is the key to correct diagnosis
See the Tanaka criteria / International consensus guidelines for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas (2012) for further details
MRI appearances are similar to those seen on CT. Mural nodules appear hypointense c.f. to surrounding fluid / mucin and enhance following administration of contrast. Mucin globules do not enhance and lie dependently within the duct.
Ultrasound demonstrates dilated ducts which appear hypoechoic. Mural nodules and mucin globules may appear hyperechoic, and difficult to separate from adjacent pancreatic parenchyma 6.
Diffuse main duct type has appearances essentially indistinguishable from chronic pancreatitis, with duct dilatation and parenchymal atrophy 5.
Direct imaging of the pancreatic duct demonstrates variable dilatation (segmental or diffuse or branch) depending on the type. Polypoid mural tumour or amorphous mucinous luminal filling defects may be identified 5.
Mucinous material may be seen protruding from the ampulla of Vater 6.
Treatment and prognosis
Although generally indolent, malignant degeneration does occur, with direct invasion into adjacent organs or more frequently dissemination in the peritoneal cavity (pseudomyxoma peritonei).
Current consensus criteria recommend resection for main duct IPMNs and varying treatment of branch duct IPMNs, ranging from resection to surveillance, depending on high risk stigmata and worrisome features (see: Tanaka criteria). Patient co-morbidities and wishes clearly have a major impact on the decision to operate.
If the lesion is proximal (either segmental main duct or branch type) then a Whipple procedure may be performed. If distal then a partial pancreatectomy suffices.
Complete resection is curative.
General imaging differential considerations include
- difficult to distinguish from main duct type on account of dilated duct 5
mucinous cystadenoma / cystadenocarcinoma
- should not appear to communicate with the main pancreatic duct
- should not appear to communicate with the main pancreatic duct
- appear similar to microcystic branch type IPMN
- 30-40% have central calcification
- pancreatic neoplasms
- cystic neoplasm (cystic pancreatic mass differential diagnosis)
- solid neoplasm
- gallstone pancreatitis
- interstitial oedematous pancreatitis
- necrotising pancreatitis
- international multidisciplinary classification of acute pancreatitis severity
- subacute pancreatitis
- chronic pancreatitis
- Ascaris-induced pancreatitis
- autoimmune pancreatitis
- emphysematous pancreatitis
- haemorrhagic pancreatitis
- hereditary pancreatitis
- pancreatitis associated with cystic fibrosis
- segmental pancreatitis
- acute pancreatitis
- pancreatic atrophy
- pancreatic lipomatosis
- pancreatic trauma
- 1. Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani MG. Primer of diagnostic imaging. Mosby Inc. (2003) ISBN:0323023282. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 2. Kawamoto S, Horton KM, Lawler LP et-al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: can benign lesions be differentiated from malignant lesions with multidetector CT? Radiographics. 25 (6): 1451-68. doi:10.1148/rg.256055036 - Pubmed citation
- 3. Sahani DV, Kadavigere R, Saokar A et-al. Cystic pancreatic lesions: a simple imaging-based classification system for guiding management. Radiographics. 25 (6): 1471-84. doi:10.1148/rg.256045161 - Pubmed citation
- 4. Dähnert W. Radiology review manual. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2003) ISBN:0781738954. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 5. Procacci C, Megibow AJ, Carbognin G et-al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 19 (6): 1447-63. Radiographics (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 6. Silas AM, Morrin MM, Raptopoulos V et-al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176 (1): 179-85. AJR Am J Roentgenol (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 7. Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V et-al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12 (3): 183-97. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004 - Pubmed citation
Synonyms & Alternative Spellings
|Synonyms or Alternative Spelling||Include in Listings?|
|Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms||✗|
|Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN)||✗|