Note on figures / percentages
We all know that figures can vary widely from various publications, and usually precise figures are irrelevant.
Some texts favour listing the the range that has been published without giving a 'best guess ballpark figure'. We feel this is not entirely useful as it often generates very wide ranges which are had to remember and are of little help: e.g. 5-72%
When you encounter such a problem please try and collapse the figures to a rough average that agrees with most of the figures and include the range as well, with appropriate references. Often text books have done this already, using multiple sources to arrive at a ball-park.
The resulting number should look like: ~35% (range 12-72%) 1-5.
Note the following structure:
- ~ indicates that this is an approximation
- figure is rounded off
- to nearest 5 for numbers beween 15 - 85% is usually appropriate
- at either extreme precise numbers are probably best
- the range is in brackets
- references included to support this range
Related articles
- style guide and help
- general overview
- style guide
- numbers, units and operators
- language and spelling
- spelling (english language)
- non-english
- punctuation etc...
- articles
- have a play in our sandbox (test page)
- how to create an article (watch YouTube tutorial)
- anatomy of an article
- article structure
- standard medium to long article structure
- articles on conditions that affect multiple systems
- short article structure
- special types of articles
- contributing a case to illustrate an article
- adding images to an article
- merging duplicate articles
- eponymous syndromes
- synonyms (watch YouTube tutorial)
- stub
- cases
- why upload cases to Radiopaedia.org
- how to upload a case (watch YouTube tutorial)
- patient confidentiality
- anatomy of the perfect case
- text
- quiz mode
- images / series
- attributes and selection tools

Details successfully updated.
Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.