TIPS evaluation

Changed by Daniel J Bell, 18 Nov 2021

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

TIPS evaluation is useful to ensure that thea transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is(TIPS) is working properly and that no stenosis has occurred within the stent. Ultrasound is often used as a first-line modality.

Radiographic features

Ultrasound

The normal TIPS should show colour Doppler flow throughout its length. The in-stent velocities are typically higher than in a native portal vein 1.

Trending stent velocities over multiple exams adds specificity to a single evaluation. If there is a concern for a stenosis based on a combination of abnormal findings, venography can be pursued.

Normal
  • normal TIPS velocity: 90-190 cm/sec/s
  • normal portal vein velocity before entering the TIPS: ~30 cm/sec/s
  • phasic waveform
  • the portal vein branches normally reverse their flow into the shunt
Stenosis
  • colour Doppler aliasing at the site of the stenosis
  • velocity of >190 cm/sec/s at a stenotic segment
  • velocity of <90 cm/sec/s in nonstenoticnon-stenotic segments
  • velocity <30 cm/sec/s in the pre-stentprestent portal vein (accessory sign)
  • complete occlusion: lack of colour Doppler flow

Always be sure to thoroughly evaluate the hepatic vein distal to the stent as well.

3D and 4D ultrasound techniques to evaluate TIPS flow volumes are being developed as a possible improvement over using velocities 3.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is also being evaluated as a tool to improve non-invasive assessment of TIPS 8.

Venography

Non-invasive investigations are usually effective at assessing the patency and flow of the TIPS shunt5. In case of inconclusive results after US or cross-sectional imaging and in the appropriate clinical settings (e.g. suspicion of thrombosis or significant in-stent stenosis in patient with recurrent bleeding after TIPS) an invasive interrogation of the tract might be necessary. 

The shunt is cannulated using usually a right internal jugular vein access. A non-selective angiographic catheter (e.g. 5 Fr pigtail) should be advanced in the portal vein, in order to confirm antegrade flow through the stent via the hepatic vein into the right atrium: this allows to evaluate for shunt thrombosis or stenosis6

Portal venography also characterises the dynamic flow distribution between the splenoportal axis, and porto-systemicportosystemic or porto-azygousportoazygos shunts. After a successful TIPS, there should not be preferential filling of such shunts feeding gastric varices. 

CT

Studies have investigated whether CT can be used to assess TIPS patency and stenosis 7. However most centres continue to rely on ultrasound +/- venography as the mainstay 8.

Practical points

  • when using color Doppler ultrasound for evaluation, remember to take angle correction into account to avoid false positives; if there is an area of the TIPS without color flow, make sure the TIPS is not approaching 90 degrees relative° relative to the transducer
  • patency of covered TIPS stents is better than bare metal stents and many centers do not evaluate them on a regular schedule, only when there is a suspicion for stent failure
  • recently placed TIPS stents often contain a small amount of gas in the wall of the stent, so if a baseline ultrasound exam is desired, consider waiting a week for the gas to resorb before imaging
  • -<p><strong>TIPS evaluation</strong> is useful to ensure that the shunt is working properly and that no stenosis has occurred within the stent. Ultrasound is often used as a first-line modality.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>The normal <a href="/articles/transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt-1">TIPS</a> should show colour Doppler flow throughout its length. The in-stent velocities are typically higher than in a native <a href="/articles/portal-vein">portal vein</a> <sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Trending stent velocities over multiple exams adds specificity to a single evaluation. If there is a concern for a stenosis based on a combination of abnormal findings, venography can be pursued.</p><h6>Normal</h6><ul>
  • -<li>normal TIPS velocity: 90-190 cm/sec</li>
  • -<li>normal portal vein velocity before entering the TIPS: ~30 cm/sec</li>
  • +<p><strong>TIPS evaluation</strong> is useful to ensure that a <a href="/articles/transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt-1">transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)</a> is working properly and that no stenosis has occurred within the stent. Ultrasound is often used as a first-line <a href="/articles/modality">modality</a>.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>The normal <a href="/articles/transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt-1">TIPS</a> should show colour Doppler flow throughout its length. The in-stent velocities are typically higher than in a native <a href="/articles/portal-vein">portal vein</a> <sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Trending stent velocities over multiple exams adds specificity to a single evaluation. If there is a concern for a stenosis based on a combination of abnormal findings, venography can be pursued.</p><h6>Normal</h6><ul>
  • +<li>normal TIPS velocity: 90-190 cm/s</li>
  • +<li>normal portal vein velocity before entering the TIPS: ~30 cm/s</li>
  • -<li>velocity of &gt;190 cm/sec at a stenotic segment</li>
  • -<li>velocity of &lt;90 cm/sec in nonstenotic segments</li>
  • -<li>velocity &lt;30 cm/sec in the pre-stent portal vein (accessory sign)</li>
  • +<li>velocity of &gt;190 cm/s at a stenotic segment</li>
  • +<li>velocity of &lt;90 cm/s in non-stenotic segments</li>
  • +<li>velocity &lt;30 cm/s in the prestent portal vein (accessory sign)</li>
  • -</ul><p>Always be sure to thoroughly evaluate the hepatic vein distal to the stent as well.</p><p>3D and 4D ultrasound techniques to evaluate TIPS flow volumes are being developed as a possible improvement over using velocities <sup>3</sup>.</p><h5>Venography</h5><p>Non-invasive investigations are usually effective at assessing the patency and flow of the TIPS shunt<sup>5</sup>. In case of inconclusive results after US or cross-sectional imaging and in the appropriate clinical settings (e.g. suspicion of thrombosis or significant in-stent stenosis in patient with recurrent bleeding after TIPS) an invasive interrogation of the tract might be necessary. </p><p>The shunt is cannulated using usually a right internal jugular vein access. A non-selective angiographic catheter (e.g. 5 Fr pigtail) should be advanced in the portal vein, in order to confirm antegrade flow through the stent via the hepatic vein into the right atrium: this allows to evaluate for shunt thrombosis or stenosis<sup>6</sup>. </p><p>Portal venography also characterises the dynamic flow distribution between the splenoportal axis, and porto-systemic or porto-azygous shunts. After a successful TIPS, there should not be preferential filling of such shunts feeding gastric varices. </p><h4>Practical points</h4><ul>
  • -<li>when using color Doppler ultrasound for evaluation, remember to take angle correction into account to avoid false positives; if there is an area of the TIPS without color flow, make sure the TIPS is not approaching 90 degrees relative to the transducer</li>
  • +</ul><p>Always be sure to thoroughly evaluate the hepatic vein distal to the stent as well.</p><p>3D and 4D ultrasound techniques to evaluate TIPS flow volumes are being developed as a possible improvement over using velocities <sup>3</sup>.</p><p><a title="Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)" href="/articles/contrast-enhanced-ultrasound-2">Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)</a> is also being evaluated as a tool to improve non-invasive assessment of TIPS <sup>8</sup>.</p><h5>Venography</h5><p>Non-invasive investigations are usually effective at assessing the patency and flow of the TIPS shunt <sup>5</sup>. In case of inconclusive results after US or cross-sectional imaging and in the appropriate clinical settings (e.g. suspicion of thrombosis or significant in-stent stenosis in patient with recurrent bleeding after TIPS) an invasive interrogation of the tract might be necessary. </p><p>The shunt is cannulated using usually a right internal jugular vein access. A non-selective angiographic catheter (e.g. 5 Fr pigtail) should be advanced in the portal vein, in order to confirm antegrade flow through the stent via the hepatic vein into the right atrium: this allows to evaluate for shunt thrombosis or stenosis <sup>6</sup>. </p><p>Portal venography also characterises the dynamic flow distribution between the splenoportal axis, and portosystemic or portoazygos shunts. After a successful TIPS, there should not be preferential filling of such shunts feeding gastric varices. </p><h5>CT</h5><p>Studies have investigated whether CT can be used to assess TIPS patency and stenosis <sup>7</sup>. However most centres continue to rely on ultrasound +/- venography as the mainstay <sup>8</sup>.</p><h4>Practical points</h4><ul>
  • +<li>when using color Doppler ultrasound for evaluation, remember to take angle correction into account to avoid false positives; if there is an area of the TIPS without color flow, make sure the TIPS is not approaching 90° relative to the transducer</li>

References changed:

  • 2. Kanterman R, Darcy M, Middleton W, Sterling K, Teefey S, Pilgram T. Doppler Sonography Findings Associated with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Malfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(2):467-72. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228">doi:10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9016228">Pubmed</a>
  • 3. Pinter S, Rubin J, Kripfgans O et al. Volumetric Blood Flow in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Revision Using 3-Dimensional Doppler Sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(2):257-66. <a href="https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.34.2.257">doi:10.7863/ultra.34.2.257</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25614399">Pubmed</a>
  • 4. Kliewer M, Hertzberg B, Heneghan J et al. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts (TIPS). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(1):149-52. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750149">doi:10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750149</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10882265">Pubmed</a>
  • 5. Cura M, Cura A, Suri R, El-Merhi F, Lopera J, Kroma G. Causes of TIPS Dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(6):1751-7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.3534">doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3534</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020247">Pubmed</a>
  • 6. Karim Valji. The Practice of Interventional Radiology, with Online Cases and Video E-Book. (2011) ISBN: 9781455733545 - <a href="http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN9781455733545">Google Books</a>
  • 7. Darcy M. Evaluation and Management of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(4):730-6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9060">doi:10.2214/ajr.12.9060</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997362">Pubmed</a>
  • 1. John S. Pellerito, Joseph F. Polak. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. (2012) ISBN: 9781437714173 - <a href="http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN9781437714173">Google Books</a>
  • 8. Marschner C, Geyer T, Froelich M, Rübenthaler J, Schwarze V, Clevert D. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Perfusion. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(9):1593. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091593">doi:10.3390/diagnostics11091593</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34573935">Pubmed</a>
  • 2. Kanterman RY, Darcy MD, Middleton WD et-al. Doppler sonography findings associated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168 (2): 467-72. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228">doi:10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9016228">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
  • 3. Pinter SZ, Rubin JM, Kripfgans OD et-al. Volumetric blood flow in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt revision using 3-dimensional Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34 (2): 257-66. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.34.2.257">doi:10.7863/ultra.34.2.257</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25614399">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
  • 4. Mark A. Kliewer, Barbara S. Hertzberg, Joan P. Heneghan, Paul V. Suhocki, Douglas H. Sheafor, Peter A. Gannon, Jr., Erik K. Paulson. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts (TIPS). (2012) American Journal of Roentgenology. 175 (1): 149-52. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750149">doi:10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750149</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10882265">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 5. Cura M, Cura A, Suri R, et al. Causes of TIPS dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1751. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3534
  • 6. Valji, K. The Practice of Interventional Radiology, with Online Cases and Videos. Ed Saunders (2011).
  • 1. Pellerito J, MPH JFPMD. Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography: Expert Consult - Online and Print, 6e. Saunders. ISBN:143771417X. <a href="http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN143771417X">Read it at Google Books</a> - <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/143771417X">Find it at Amazon</a><span class="auto"></span>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.