Hydrocephalus

Changed by Raymond Chieng, 24 Sep 2022
Disclosures - updated 17 Aug 2022: Nothing to disclose

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Hydrocephalus denotes an increase in the volume of CSF, causing the distension of cerebral ventricles (ventriculomegaly) due to insufficient passage of the CSF from its point of production in the ventricles into the systemic circulation 7.

Terminology

Although hydrocephalus is typically referred to as either being "obstructive" or "communicating", this can lead to confusion as to the underlying cause of ventriculomegaly as the terms are referring to different aspects of the underlying pathophysiology (namely "why" and "where").

For example, acute subarachnoid haemorrhage confined to the basal cisterns can result in ventriculomegaly by obstructing the normal flow of CSF through the basal cisterns, and by filling the arachnoid granulations. Given that this is mechanistically an obstruction to CSF flow outside of the ventricular system should it be considered communicating or obstructive hydrocephalus? The correct answer is that it is actually communicating obstructive hydrocephalus.

As such a more precise terminology is to divide hydrocephalus into:

  1. communicating and non-communicating: addressing "where" the obstruction is located
  2. obstructive and non-obstructive: on the grounds of whether or not there is obstruction of CSF pathways in the ventricles or the subarachnoid space 1-3

Pathology

Types of hydrocephalus are as follows (see figures 1 and 2):

  • communicating (i.e. CSF can exit the ventricular system)
    • with obstruction to CSF absorption
      • usually referred to merely as communicating hydrocephalus
      • passage of CSF from the ventricular system into the subarachnoid space is unimpeded but at some point between the basal cisterns and the arachnoid granulations, normal flow is impeded
        • subarachnoid haemorrhage (obstruction can be acute when filling the basal cisterns with blood clot, or chronic due to scarring of the subarachnoid space and arachnoid granulations)
        • infective meningitis (both during infection and chronic) 
          • TB meningitis is typically basal filling the basal cisterns
          • bacterial meningitis is typically also over the convexities
        • leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
    • without obstruction to CSF absorption
      • a particular group of conditions with disparate, and often poorly understood, abnormal CSF dynamics, including:
      • additionally, other conditions with large ventricles fall into this group although they are often not thought of as hydrocephalus. These include
  • non-communicating (i.e. CSF cannot exit the ventricular system, and thus there is by definition obstruction to CSF absorption)

Radiographic features

CT
  • bicaudate index is larger than 95th percentile on age 5
  • axial width of temporal horn lateral ventricle more than or equal to 5 mm ​5

History

Walter Dandy first attempted to classify hydrocephalus into communicating, non-communicating, obstructive, and non-obstructive-communicating (obstructive) types in 1913 by injecting dyes into experimental animals and later children with hydrocephalus 6. If the dye can be retrieved from spinal subarachnoid space, it would mean the hydrocephalus is "communicating". If the dye cannot be retrieved, it would mean the hydrocephalus is "non-communicating" or "obstructive". Although it is widely believed that defective absorption of CSF at the arachnoid granulation is the cause of communicating hydrocephalus, actually, obstruction between spinal subarachnoid space and basal cisterns or between the basal cisterns with arachnoid villi are more common problems. In 1960, Ransohoff recognised this problem tried to reclassify hydrocephalus into "intraventricular obstructive" and "extraventricular". However, his work was largely ignored 6.

  • -</ul><h4>History</h4><p><strong>Walter Dandy</strong> first classify hydrocephalus into communicating, non-communicating, obstructive, and non-obstructive types in 1913 <sup>6</sup>.</p>
  • +</ul><h4>History</h4><p><strong>Walter Dandy</strong> first attempted to classify hydrocephalus into communicating and non-communicating (obstructive) types in 1913 by injecting dyes into experimental animals and later children with hydrocephalus <sup>6</sup>. If the dye can be retrieved from spinal subarachnoid space, it would mean the hydrocephalus is "communicating". If the dye cannot be retrieved, it would mean the hydrocephalus is "non-communicating" or "obstructive". Although it is widely believed that defective absorption of CSF at the arachnoid granulation is the cause of communicating hydrocephalus, actually, obstruction between spinal subarachnoid space and basal cisterns or between the basal cisterns with arachnoid villi are more common problems. In 1960, Ransohoff recognised this problem tried to reclassify hydrocephalus into "intraventricular obstructive" and "extraventricular". However, his work was largely ignored <sup>6</sup>.</p>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.