Metaphyseal corner fracture
Updates to Article Attributes
Metaphyseal corner fracture is, also termed classical metaphyseal lesion (CML), is a fracture observed in young children (<2 years). It is considered pathognomic for non-accidental injury (NAI)1.
Prevalence
This injury is not only the fracture most specific for NAI, it is also common amongst abused children, occurring in 39-59%
Pathophysiology
The biomechanics of metaphyseal fracture is the cumulation of multiple microfractures across the metaphysis with an orientation perpendicular to the long axis of the bone. To-and-fro manipulation (shaking) is the force applied, for example holding the child around the trunk while shaking, with the limbs moving back and forth with a resultant whiplash, or shear force. The microfractures occur in immature mineralised bone.
This injury occurs almost exclusively in children under 2 years of age because 1) they are small enough to thebe shaken; 2) they cannot protect their limbs.
Radiographic features
Radiography
lucentLucent area within the subphyseal metaphysis perpendicular to the long axis of the bone. The fracture extends across the metaphysis (completely or partially)
Nuclear medicine
Like other fractures there is increased uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate. However, intense uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate at the metaphyses is normal in young children,; abnormally increased uptake may be difficult to identify. Therefore scintigraphy is considered complementary only (as far as metaphyseal corner fractures are concerned).
-<p><strong>Metaphyseal fracture</strong> is a fracture observed in young children (<2 years). It is considered pathognomic for <a href="/articles/non-accidental-injury">non-accidental injury</a> (NAI).</p><h4>Prevalence</h4><p>This injury is not only the fracture most specific for <a href="/articles/nai">NAI,</a> it is also common amongst abused children, occurring in 39-59%</p><h4>Pathophysiology</h4><p>The biomechanics of metaphyseal fracture is the <strong>cumulation of multiple microfractures</strong> across the metaphysis with an orientation perpendicular to the long axis of the bone. To-and-fro manipulation (shaking) is the force applied, for example holding the child around the trunk while shaking, with the limbs moving back and forth with a resultant whiplash, or <strong>shear force</strong>. The microfractures occur in immature mineralised bone</p><p>This injury occurs almost exclusively in children under 2 years of age because 1) they are small enough to the shaken; 2) they cannot protect their limbs.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Radiography</h5><p>lucent area within the subphyseal metaphysis perpendicular to the long axis of bone The fracture extends across the metaphysis (completely or partially )</p><h5>Nuclear medicine</h5><p>Like other fractures there is increased uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate. However, intense uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate at the metaphyses is normal in young children, abnormally increased uptake may be difficult to identify. Therefore scintigraphy is considered complementary only (as far as metaphyseal fractures are concerned).</p>- +<p><strong>Metaphyseal corner fracture</strong>, also termed classical metaphyseal lesion (CML), is a fracture observed in young children (<2 years). It is considered pathognomic for <a href="/articles/non-accidental-injury">non-accidental injury</a> (NAI)<sup>1</sup>.</p><h4>Prevalence</h4><p>This injury is not only the fracture most specific for <a href="/articles/nai">NAI,</a> it is also common amongst abused children, occurring in 39-59%</p><h4>Pathophysiology</h4><p>The biomechanics of metaphyseal fracture is the <strong>cumulation of multiple microfractures</strong> across the metaphysis with an orientation perpendicular to the long axis of the bone. To-and-fro manipulation (shaking) is the force applied, for example holding the child around the trunk while shaking, with the limbs moving back and forth with a resultant whiplash, or <strong>shear force</strong>. The microfractures occur in immature mineralised bone.</p><p>This injury occurs almost exclusively in children under 2 years of age because 1) they are small enough to be shaken; 2) they cannot protect their limbs.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Radiography</h5><p>Lucent area within the subphyseal metaphysis perpendicular to the long axis of the bone. The fracture extends across the metaphysis (completely or partially)</p><h5>Nuclear medicine</h5><p>Like other fractures there is increased uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate. However, intense uptake of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate at the metaphyses is normal in young children; abnormally increased uptake may be difficult to identify. Therefore scintigraphy is considered complementary only (as far as metaphyseal corner fractures are concerned).</p>
References changed:
- 2. Lonergan G, Baker A, Morey M, Boos S. From the Archives of the AFIP. Child Abuse: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23(4):811-45. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.234035030">doi:10.1148/rg.234035030</a>
- 2. Lonergan G, Baker A, Morey M, Boos S. From the Archives of the AFIP. Child Abuse: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23(4):811-45. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.234035030">doi:10.1148/rg.234035030</a>
- 1. Dwek J. The Radiographic Approach to Child Abuse. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2011;469(3):776-89. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5">doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5</a>
- 1. Dwek J. The Radiographic Approach to Child Abuse. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2011;469(3):776-89. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5">doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5</a>
- 3. Tenney-Soeiro R & Wilson C. An Update on Child Abuse and Neglect. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004;16(2):233-7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00008480-200404000-00022">doi:10.1097/00008480-200404000-00022</a>
- 3. Tenney-Soeiro R & Wilson C. An Update on Child Abuse and Neglect. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004;16(2):233-7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00008480-200404000-00022">doi:10.1097/00008480-200404000-00022</a>
- 2. Tenney-soeiro R, Wilson C. An update on child abuse and neglect. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2004;16 (2): 233-7. <a href="http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=1040-8703&volume=16&issue=2&spage=233">Curr. Opin. Pediatr. (link)</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15021210">Pubmed citation</a><div class="ref_v2"></div>
- 3. Tenney-soeiro R, Wilson C. An update on child abuse and neglect. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2004;16 (2): 233-7. <a href="http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=1040-8703&volume=16&issue=2&spage=233">Curr. Opin. Pediatr. (link)</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15021210">Pubmed citation</a><div class="ref_v2"></div>
- 1. Lonergan GJ, Baker AM, Morey MK et-al. From the archives of the AFIP. Child abuse: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23 (4): 811-45. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12853657">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
- 2. Lonergan GJ, Baker AM, Morey MK et-al. From the archives of the AFIP. Child abuse: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23 (4): 811-45. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12853657">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
- 1. Dwek JR. The radiographic approach to child abuse. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011;469 (3): 776-89. <a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5/fulltext.html">Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (full text)</a> - <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5">doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1414-5</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032862">Free text at pubmed</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20544318">Pubmed citation</a><span class="ref_v3"></span>