Cognard classification of dural arteriovenous fistulas

Changed by Vincent Tatco, 23 Dec 2016

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

The Cognard classification of dural arteriovenous fistulas correlates venous drainage patterns with increasingly aggressive neurological clinical course. It was first described in 1995 1 and at the time of writing (July 2016) is probably the most widely used classification system for dural arteriovenous malformations. 

An alternative and also popular classification system, also proposed in 1995, is the Borden classification 3. It is a little simpler (only 3 grades) and only takes into account the site of fistula and presence or absence of cortical venous drainage.  It does not assess direction of flow or presence of venous ectasia. It has been suggested that it does not capture the differences in terms of rate of haemorrhage reflected in the Cognard classification 2,4

Structure

The Cognard classification divides dural arteriovenous fistulas into 5 types according to the following features: 

  • location of fistula
  • presence of cortical venous drainage
  • direction of flow
  • presence of venous ectasia

Classification

  • type I
    • confined to sinus
    • antegrade flow
    • no cortical venous drainage / reflux
  • type II
    • IIa 
      • confined to sinus
      • retrograde flow (reflux) into sinus
      • no cortical venous drainage / reflux
    • IIb
      • drains into sinus with reflux into cortical veins
      • antegrade flow
    • IIa+b
      • drains into sinus with reflux into cortical veins
      • retrograde flow flow 
  • type III
    • drains directly into cortical veins (not into sinus) drainage (40% haemorrhage)
  • type IV
    • drains directly into cortical veins (not into sinus) drainage with venous ectasia (65% haemorrhage)
  • type V
    • spinal perimedullary venous drainage, associated with progressive myelopathy

Prognosis

In terms of prognosis, fistulas can be divided broadly into benign and aggressive lesions as follows 5

  • benign = types I and IIa (lack of cortical venous drainage)
  • aggressive = everything else
    • annual risk of non-haemorrhage neurological deficit = 6.9%
    • annual risk of intracranial haemorrhage = 8.1%
    • combined annual mortality rate = 10.4%
  • -<p>The <strong>Cognard classification </strong>of <a href="/articles/dural-arteriovenous-fistula">dural arteriovenous fistulas</a> correlates venous drainage patterns with increasingly aggressive neurological clinical course. It was first described in 1995 1 and at the time of writing (July 2016) is probably the most widely used classification system for dural arteriovenous malformations. </p><p>An alternative and also popular classification system, also proposed in 1995, is the <a href="/articles/borden-classification-of-dural-arteriovenous-fistulas-1">Borden classification</a> <sup>3</sup>. It is a little simpler (only 3 grades) and only takes into account the site of fistula and presence or absence of cortical venous drainage.  It does not assess direction of flow or presence of venous ectasia. It has been suggested that it does not capture the differences in terms of rate of haemorrhage reflected in the Cognard classification <sup>2,4</sup>. </p><h4>Structure</h4><p>The Cognard classification divides dural arteriovenous fistulas into 5 types according to the following features: </p><ul>
  • +<p>The <strong>Cognard classification </strong>of <a href="/articles/dural-arteriovenous-fistula">dural arteriovenous fistulas</a> correlates venous drainage patterns with increasingly aggressive neurological clinical course. It was first described in 1995 <sup>1</sup> and at the time of writing (July 2016) is probably the most widely used classification system for dural arteriovenous malformations. </p><p>An alternative and also popular classification system, also proposed in 1995, is the <a href="/articles/borden-classification-of-dural-arteriovenous-fistulas-1">Borden classification</a> <sup>3</sup>. It is a little simpler (only 3 grades) and only takes into account the site of fistula and presence or absence of cortical venous drainage.  It does not assess direction of flow or presence of venous ectasia. It has been suggested that it does not capture the differences in terms of rate of haemorrhage reflected in the Cognard classification <sup>2,4</sup>. </p><h4>Structure</h4><p>The Cognard classification divides dural arteriovenous fistulas into 5 types according to the following features: </p><ul>
  • -<li>
  • -<strong>​</strong>confined to sinus</li>
  • +<li>confined to sinus</li>
  • -<li>
  • -<strong>​</strong>drains into sinus with reflux into cortical veins</li>
  • +<li>drains into sinus with reflux into cortical veins</li>
  • -<li>
  • -<strong>​</strong>drains into sinus with reflux into cortical veins</li>
  • +<li>drains into sinus with reflux into cortical veins</li>
  • -<strong>type III</strong><ul><li>
  • -<strong>​</strong>drains directly into cortical veins (not into sinus) drainage (40% haemorrhage)</li></ul>
  • +<strong>type III</strong><ul><li>drains directly into cortical veins (not into sinus) drainage (40% haemorrhage)</li></ul>
  • -<strong>type IV</strong><ul><li>
  • -<strong>​</strong>drains directly into cortical veins (not into sinus) drainage with venous ectasia (65% haemorrhage)</li></ul>
  • +<strong>type IV</strong><ul><li>drains directly into cortical veins (not into sinus) drainage with venous ectasia (65% haemorrhage)</li></ul>
  • -<strong>type V</strong><ul><li>
  • -<strong>​</strong>spinal perimedullary venous drainage, associated with progressive myelopathy</li></ul>
  • +<strong>type V</strong><ul><li>spinal perimedullary venous drainage, associated with progressive myelopathy</li></ul>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads