Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Frank Gaillard had no recorded disclosures.View Frank Gaillard's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Henry Knipe had the following disclosures:
- Integral Diagnostics, Shareholder (ongoing)
- Micro-X Ltd, Shareholder (ongoing)
These were assessed during peer review and were determined to not be relevant to the changes that were made.View Henry Knipe's current disclosures
The acetabular angle, also known as the Sharp angle 6, is a radiographic measurement most commonly used when evaluating for potential developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). It is most useful in patients who have started to ossify the epiphysis since ossification diminishes the usefulness of ultrasound.
In children, the angle is formed by a horizontal plane of the pelvis defined by a line connecting both triradiate cartilages (Hilgenreiner line) and a second line that extends through to the lateral aspect of the acetabular roof 7,8.
In adults, where the triradiate cartilages are fused and therefore inapparent, the horizontal plane of the pelvis defined as the inferior margin of the pelvic teardrop is used instead 7. This, of course, shifts the horizontal line inferiorly and changes the value of the angle ref.
Normal values in children
The acetabular angle using the Hilgenreiner line should be <30º at birth 9. The angle should become progressively shallower with age and should measure <22º at and beyond 1 year 9.
Normal values in adults
The normal range is 33º to 38º 6,8. An increased acetabular angle defining acetabular dysplasia varies between authors and is reported at >42º 6 or ≥45º 7. When the angle is between the upper end of the normal range and an increased acetabular angle the terms "borderline" or "indeterminate" can be used 6,7. A decreased acetabular angle is <32º 6.
Having the center beam above or below the pubis can alter the measurement due to geometric distortion. Although a 5 cm error in beam alignment only changes the measurement by 4º, this does mean that these measurements should not be performed on an abdominal radiograph ref.
increased acetabular angles
decreased acetabular angles
- 1. Lee Y, Chung C, Koo K, Lee K, Kwon D, Park M. Measuring Acetabular Dysplasia in Plain Radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(9):1219-26. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1279-4 - Pubmed
- 2. Ackland M, Bourne W, Uhthoff H. Anteversion of the Acetabular Cup. Measurement of Angle After Total Hip Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68(3):409-13. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.68B3.3733807 - Pubmed
- 3. Yoo W, Moon H, Cho T, Choi I. Does Shelf Acetabuloplasty Influence Acetabular Growth and Remodeling? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(9):2411-20. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2163-9 - Pubmed
- 4. Rampal V, Klein C, Arellano E et al. Outcomes of Modified Dega Acetabuloplasty in Acetabular Dysplasia Related to Developmental Dislocation of the Hip. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014;100(2):207-11. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.12.015 - Pubmed
- 5. Wenger D. Surgical Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Instr Course Lect. 2014;63:313-23. - Pubmed
- 6. Mannava S, Geeslin A, Frangiamore S et al. Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Part 2, Plain Radiography. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(5):e2003-9. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.011 - Pubmed
- 7. Welton K, Jesse M, Kraeutler M, Garabekyan T, Mei-Dan O. The Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg. 2018;100(1):76-85. doi:10.2106/jbjs.17.00500 - Pubmed
- 8. Sharp I. Acetabular Dysplasia. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 1961;43-B(2):268-72. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.43b2.268
- 9. Starr V & Ha B. Imaging Update on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip With the Role of MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(6):1324-35. doi:10.2214/ajr.13.12449 - Pubmed