Acetabular dysplasia is a form of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) often referred to in the adolescent and adult population 5.
Adult hip dysplasia has an estimated prevalence of 0.1% and is more common in women 1,2. Male sex is apparently associated with posterosuperior deficiency 2.
Risk factors for acetabular dysplasia include the following 1,2:
Patients usually present with hip pain or groin pain especially with extreme positions e.g. high hip flexion and hyperextension. In addition, there may be limping or signs and symptoms of hip instability ref. Clinical signs include a positive anterior apprehension test and/or anterior impingement tests ref.
25-50% of patients with acetabular dysplasia will develop early hip osteoarthritis if left untreated 1-6.
Other complications include1-3:
Acetabular dysplasia is characterized by a smaller weight-bearing surface than the normal acetabulum, which ultimately leads to increased contact stress and static overload due to under-coverage of the femoral head and to structural instability. This adds to cartilage and/or labral injury as well as damage to the joint capsule 1-3.
Acetabular dysplasia might be the result of abnormal growth after treatment or missed developmental dysplasia of the hip during childhood, the etiology of which is multi-factorial in nature. It may be also due to other hip pathologies that have occurred during childhood as septic arthritis, trauma or Legg-Calve-Perthes disease ref.
Acetabular dysplasia can be divided into different patterns with respect to the 3-D morphology. One grading scheme subdivides the acetabular dysplasia into the following patterns with lateral acetabular deficiency being constantly present 2:
- global acetabular deficiency
- anterosuperior acetabular deficiency
- posterosuperior acetabular deficiency
Other schemes differentiate anterior, posterior and global or lateral deficiencies 1.
Acetabular dysplasia is associated with the following conditions 1,2:
- infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip
- excessive femoral anteversion
- acetabular retroversion
- coxa valga
- head-neck junction deformities
- femoral head asphericity
Radiographic assessment of acetabular dysplasia or adult hip dysplasia includes plain radiographs of the pelvis and additional planes as the false profile view of Lequesne, cross-table lateral or frog-leg lateral views.
Cross-sectional imaging is advised for better three-dimensional characterization, preoperative planning 2 and the detection of chondral and labral lesions.
The most common measurement in acetabular dysplasia is the lateral center-edge angle on a plain anterior-posterior radiograph of the pelvis 1,3. Patients should be in the supine position with both legs in 15° of internal rotation to maximize femoral neck length 1.
A value of ≤25° is considered abnormal or borderline and a value of ≤20° as an indicator for dysplasia 1,3,4. The cut-off should be also adapted to the measurement and whether the lateral bony acetabular rim or the lateral edge of the acetabular sourcil was taken to measure the lateral center-edge angle 7.
Further measurements to confirm insufficient acetabular coverage are the following 1,3,4:
- acetabular index or Tönnis angle
- extrusion index
- medial center edge angle
- acetabular arc
- the anterior center-edge angle of Lequesne (assessed on false profile view – moderate reproducibility)
- femoral head-neck-shaft angle (to assess for coxa valga and surgical planning)
The main role of CT is improved characterization of the three-dimensional acetabular morphology in a setting of preoperative planning. It should also comprise the assessment for excessive acetabular anteversion or acetabular retroversion. Other than the crossover sign on the anterior-posterior view of the pelvis, CT can also differentiate posterior under-coverage in the setting of acetabular dysplasia from anterior overcoverage in the setting of pincer morphology or plain acetabular retroversion and it can better assess the grade of posterior deficiency than the posterior wall sign 2.
CT measurements for the assessment of acetabular dysplasia include the following and are conducted one cut above the greater trochanters 1:
- anterior acetabular sector angle: a value of ≤50° indicates dysplasia
- posterior acetabular sector angle: a value of ≤90° indicates dysplasia
- horizontal acetabular sector angle: a value of ≤140° indicates dysplasia
In addition to the three-dimensional assessment of the acetabular and femoral morphology, which highly benefits from 3D imaging in this situation, MRI allows for assessment of concomitant labral, chondral or ligamentum teres injury as well as the evaluation of the joint capsule 1.
The radiological report should include the description of the following 1,2:
- acetabular morphology
- measurements: e.g. lateral center-edge angle, acetabular index and/or extrusion index
- signs of early osteoarthritis: subchondral sclerosis, cysts, osteophytes and Tonnis grade
- labral and/or chondral injury or ligamentum teres injury
- fovea alta (if present)
Treatment and prognosis
Treatment options of acetabular dysplasia include in particular periacetabular osteotomy 1,6 and other acetabular osteotomies (e.g. Salter) which reorient the acetabulum in a fashion that it provides better coverage for the femoral head. Other surgical options are acetabuloplasties, that alter the morphology of the acetabulum (e.g. Pemberton) 6,8. Periacetabular osteotomy is in particular indicated in patients with a preserved range of motion.
Salvage osteotomies (e.g. Chiari or shelf osteotomy) do not preserve articular cartilage and can be considered if the hip needs to be stabilized in incongruous joints 8.
In case of a severely arthritic hip, joint replacement surgery might be considered and include total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty 1.
The role of conservative management is limited due to the early progression to osteoarthritis and should decrease pain and can be chosen in very mild dysplasia with mild symptoms. Non-operative treatment includes weight loss, activity and lifestyle modifications as well as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, specialized physical therapy intra-articular injections ref.
Operative complications include the following:
- femoroacetabular impingement in case of overcorrection 1,9
- hip osteoarthritis
- femoroacetabular impingement
- other forms of hip impingement
- transient osteoporosis of the hip
- osteonecrosis of the hip
- subchondral insufficiency fractures
- 1. Beltran LS, Rosenberg ZS, Mayo JD, De Tuesta MD, Martin O, Neto LP, Bencardino JT. Imaging evaluation of developmental hip dysplasia in the young adult. (2013) AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 200 (5): 1077-88. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9360 - Pubmed
- 2. Nepple JJ, Wells J, Ross JR, Bedi A, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC. Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia. (2017) Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 475 (4): 1037-1044. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-5150-3 - Pubmed
- 3. Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?. (2015) Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 473 (4): 1234-46. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3 - Pubmed
- 4. Harris-Hayes M, Royer NK. Relationship of acetabular dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement to hip osteoarthritis: a focused review. (2011) PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 3 (11): 1055-1067.e1. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.533 - Pubmed
- 5. Okano K, Yamaguchi K, Ninomiya Y, Matsubayashi S, Aoyagi K, Osaki M, Enomoto H, Takahashi K. Relationship between developmental dislocation of the hip in infant and acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity. (2015) Medicine. 94 (1): e268. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000268 - Pubmed
- 6. Adler KL, Cook PC, Yen YM, Giordano BD. Current Concepts in Hip Preservation Surgery: Part I. (2015) Sports health. 7 (6): 518-26. doi:10.1177/1941738115587270 - Pubmed
- 7. Hanson JA, Kapron AL, Swenson KM, Maak TG, Peters CL, Aoki SK. Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles. (2015) Journal of hip preservation surgery. 2 (3): 280-6. doi:10.1093/jhps/hnv041 - Pubmed
- 8. Vaquero-Picado A, González-Morán G, Garay EG, Moraleda L. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: update of management. (2019) EFORT open reviews. 4 (9): 548-556. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.4.180019 - Pubmed
- 9. Castañeda P, Vidal-Ruiz C, Méndez A, Salazar DP, Torres A. How Often Does Femoroacetabular Impingement Occur After an Innominate Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia?. (2016) Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 474 (5): 1209-15. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4721-7 - Pubmed
- 10. Beaulé PE. Editorial Commentary: Quantifying Anterior and Lateral Acetabular Coverage in Hip Dysplasia: What About Posterior Coverage?. (2019) Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 35 (4): 1117-1119. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.041 - Pubmed