Acute aortic syndrome
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Jeremy Jones had no recorded disclosures.View Jeremy Jones's current disclosures
Acute aortic syndrome describes the presentation of patients with one of a number of life-threatening aortic pathologies that give rise to similar clinical presentations.
Exactly which entities are included under the umbrella term acute aortic syndrome varies somewhat from publication to publication. Three conditions are generally included, sharing epidemiological and clinical presentation as well as having overlapping and sometimes co-existing imaging features 1-5.
Although some authors also include unstable aortic aneurysmal rupture (leak) and traumatic aortic injury (e.g. thoracic aortic injury and abdominal aortic injury) 1, this article will limit itself to the aforementioned three core conditions.
Generally, patients are elderly, more frequently male and with a long history of hypertension 2,5. Additionally, connective tissue disorders (e.g Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome), as well as bicuspid aortic valve and annuloaortic ectasia, are risk factors, particularly for aortic dissection 2,5.
Patients will present similarly, with acute "aortic pain" characterized by severe chest pain that has a tearing and sometimes migratory character 2. The location of the pain correlates with the location of pathology. Pain located anteriorly in the chest or in the neck and jaw typically denotes ascending aortic involvement. In contrast, pain in the back and abdomen suggests descending aortic pathology 2. Hypertension is often present.
Imaging of patients presenting with suspected acute aortic syndrome in most centers typically involves a CT of the chest as it is readily available, fast to acquire, has been shown to have very high sensitivity and specificity, and is able to image not only the aorta but also the remainder of the neck, chest and abdomen. MRI and transesophageal echocardiography are also helpful in some situations, however, access is usually more restricted 6.
Although exact imaging parameters will depend on individual and institutional preferences, typically patients are imaged with bi-phasic or tri-phasic CT 6,7.
in low-risk patients or if dual-energy CT with virtual non-contrast imaging is available then the non-contrast phase may be omitted
preferably right arm injection to avoid streak artefact from undiluted contrast in the brachiocephalic vein
3-5 mL/sec flow rate preferred followed by a saline flush 9
non-gated CTA will cause motion (pulsation) artifact of the aortic root but high pitch rates and wider detector arrays can minimize this artifact 9
consider cardiac gating, but typically results in higher radiation
removes pulsation artifact of the aortic root and ascending aorta
allows assessment of the coronary arteries that may be involved
retrospective gating allows for the assessment of aortic valve function
morphology of dissection/ulcer
distal organ enhancement/perfusion
delayed phase 9
Imaging features of individual conditions are discussed separately:
The location of the pathology determines the treatment, rather than the type of vascular wall injury. As classically defined and simply put, pathology involving the ascending aorta is treated with emergency open surgery whereas more distal disease sparing the ascending aorta is treated with medical therapy and endovascular stenting.
Up to 30% of cases of AAS have complications at the time of presentation 8. These include (depending on the type, location and extent of AAS):
hemopericardium +/- tamponade
aortic valve dysfunction
coronary artery dissection and/or occlusion
aortic branch dissection and/or occlusion
end organ ischemia or infarction