Biffl scale for blunt cerebrovascular injury

Changed by Francis Deng, 19 Nov 2020

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

The Biffl scale or grade illustrates the spectrum of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) seen on angiography (both CTA and DSA). Some authors refer to the grading scale as the Denver scale, which is not to be confused with the Denver criteria, a series of clinical indications to screen for blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. 

Classification

  • grade I: mild intimal injuryluminal irregularity or irregular intimadissection with <25% luminal narrowing
  • grade II: dissection or intramural hematoma with ≥25% luminal narrowing, intraluminal thrombus, or raised intimal flap / intramural haematoma with luminal narrowing >25% / intraluminal thrombosis
  • grade III: pseudoaneurysm
  • grade IV: vessel occlusion/thrombosis occlusion
  • grade V: vessel transection, including transection with free extravasation

arteriovenousArteriovenous fistula (although this was not specified in the original definition is often included with transections (grade V4,5. However, Biffl et al. initially described fistulae as grade I if small and grade III if large 1, and later revised this description to grade II if small and grade V if hemodynamically significant 6. Other authors have proposed classifying these lesions as grade III 7.

Treatment and prognosis

This grading system has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

The risk of stroke increases with increasing grade of carotid artery injury 1:

  • grade I: 8%
  • grade II: 14%
  • grade III: 26%
  • grade IV: 50%
  • grade V: 100%

The risk of stroke does not correlate with increasing grade of vertebral artery injury 3:

  • grade I: 6%
  • grade II: 38%
  • grade III: 27%
  • grade IV: 28%
  • -<strong>grade I</strong>: mild intimal injury or irregular intima</li>
  • +<strong>grade I</strong>: luminal irregularity or dissection with &lt;25% luminal narrowing</li>
  • -<strong>grade II</strong>: <a href="/articles/arterial-dissection">dissection</a> with raised intimal flap / intramural haematoma with luminal narrowing &gt;25% / intraluminal thrombosis</li>
  • +<strong>grade II</strong>: <a href="/articles/arterial-dissection">dissection</a> or intramural hematoma with ≥25% luminal narrowing, intraluminal thrombus, or raised intimal flap</li>
  • -<strong>grade IV</strong>: vessel occlusion/thrombosis</li>
  • +<strong>grade IV</strong>: occlusion</li>
  • -<strong>grade V</strong>: vessel transection, including <a href="/articles/arteriovenous-fistula">arteriovenous fistula</a> (although this was not specified in the original definition) <sup>4,5</sup>
  • -</li>
  • -</ul><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>This grading system has prognostic and therapeutic implications.</p><p>The risk of stroke increases with increasing grade of carotid artery injury <sup>1</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +<strong>grade V</strong>: transection with free extravasation</li>
  • +</ul><p><a href="/articles/arteriovenous-fistula">Arteriovenous fistula</a> is often included with transections (grade V) <sup>4,5</sup>. However, Biffl et al. initially described fistulae as grade I if small and grade III if large <sup>1</sup>, and later revised this description to grade II if small and grade V if hemodynamically significant <sup>6</sup>. Other authors have proposed classifying these lesions as grade III <sup>7</sup>.</p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>This grading system has prognostic and therapeutic implications.</p><p>The risk of stroke increases with increasing grade of carotid artery injury <sup>1</sup>:</p><ul>

References changed:

  • 6. Biffl WL, Ray CE, Moore EE, Franciose RJ, Aly S, Heyrosa MG, Johnson JL, Burch JM. Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography. (2002) Annals of surgery. 235 (5): 699-706; discussion 706-7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200205000-00012">doi:10.1097/00000658-200205000-00012</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11981216">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 7. Ares WJ, Jankowitz BT, Tonetti DA, Gross BA, Grandhi R. A comparison of digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of penetrating cerebrovascular injury. (2019) Neurosurgical focus. 47 (5): E16. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19495">doi:10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19495</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31675711">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.