Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Alexandra Stanislavsky had no recorded disclosures.View Alexandra Stanislavsky's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Jeremy Jones had no recorded disclosures.View Jeremy Jones's current disclosures
Biparietal diameter (BPD) is one of the basic biometric parameters used to assess fetal size.
BPD together with head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) are computed to produce an estimate of fetal weight. In the second trimester this may be extrapolated to an estimate of gestational age and an estimated due date (EDD).
The BPD should be measured on an axial plane that traverses the thalami, and cavum septum pellucidum. The transducer must be perpendicular to the central axis of the head, and thus the hemispheres and calvaria should appear symmetric.
The calipers should be placed at the:
- outer edge of the near calvarial wall
- inner edge of the far calvarial wall
The cerebellar hemispheres should not be in the plane of the image.
BPD has been shown to be accurate in predicting gestational age from 14 to 20 weeks 2. The variability increases after this time. BPD may also be influenced by factors such as abnormalities of head shape, breech presentation, or multiple gestations. Head circumference (HC) may be a more reliable measurement if there is variant head shape 4.
- 1. Callen PW. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Elsevier Health Sciences. (2011) ISBN:1455726745. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 2. Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D et-al. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65 (5): 613-20. - Pubmed citation
- 3. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V et-al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37 (1): 116-26. doi:10.1002/uog.8831 - Pubmed citation
- 4. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32 (6): 1083-101. doi:10.7863/ultra.32.6.1083 - Pubmed citation