Choledocholithiasis denotes the presence of gallstones within the bile ducts (including the common hepatic duct/common bile duct).

Choledocholithiasis is relatively common, seen in up to 20% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstone-related complaints 2.

Stones within the bile ducts are often asymptomatic and may be found incidentally, however, more frequently they lead to symptomatic presentation with:

Stones within the bile duct most commonly pass from the gallbladder but may form in situ. When recurrent, they tend to be pigment stones, and are thought to be associated with bacterial infection 1.

Although ultrasound is usually the first investigation for biliary disease, it has average sensitivity for the detection of biliary stones within the bile duct.

Ultrasound should be performed both longitudinally and transversely through the duct with particular attention paid to the very distal portion of the common bile duct as it passes through the pancreatic head (best assessed transversely).

Findings include:

  • visualization of stone(s)
    • echogenic rounded focus
    • size ranges between 2 to >20 mm
    • shadowing may be more difficult to elicit than with gallstones within the gallbladder
    • ~20% of common bile duct stones will not shadow
    • twinkling artifact may be useful to detect occult stones
  • dilated bile duct
    • >6 mm + 1 mm per decade above 60 years of age
    • >10 mm post-cholecystectomy
    • dilated intrahepatic biliary tree
  • gallstones should increase suspicion, especially if multiple and small

Recently endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has also been used with very high sensitivity and specificity.

Routine contrast-enhanced CT is moderately sensitive to choledocholithiasis with a sensitivity of 65-88% 3, but it requires attention to a number of potentially subtle findings. These include:

  • target sign
    • central rounded density: stone
    • surrounding lower attenuating bile or mucosa
  • rim sign: stone is outlined by thin shell of density
  • crescent sign: bile eccentrically outlines luminal stone, creating a low attenuation crescent
  • calcification of the stone: unfortunately only 20% of stones are of high density

Setting window level to the mean of the bile duct and setting the window width to 150 HU has been reported to improve sensitivity.

Biliary dilatation may also be visible.

CT with prior administration of biliary excreted contrast agents is highly sensitive (88-96%) and specific (88-98%) 8 for choledocholithiasis. The difficulty is, however, two-fold:

  1. contrast agents have relatively high complication rates
  2. obstructive cholestasis diminishes excretion, and thus is only viable in patients with largely normal liver function tests

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has largely replaced ERCP as the gold standard for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, able to achieve similar sensitivity (90-94%) and specificity (95-99%) 7,8 without ionizing radiation, intravenous contrast, or the complication rate inherent in ERCP.

Filling defects are seen within the biliary tree on thin cross-sectional T2 weighted imaging. Care should be taken not to use thick slabs for the diagnosis as volume averaging may obscure smaller stones.

However, if the diagnosis has already been secured by ultrasound or CT, there is no additional value of MRCP, and the next step is therapeutic ERCP (see below).

Both investigations are no longer used for routine diagnosis having been replaced by ultrasound, CT and MRCP.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, however, is associated with a complication rate of 5.8-24% (10 years follow-up) 1.

Complications of ERCP and sphincterotomy include:

Failure of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones may require either intraoperative bile duct exploration, or percutaneous biliary drainage to decompress the biliary system to temporise and allow subsequent definitive management.

There is usually little differential, and differential will depend on the modality. The most frequent entities to consider include:

Gallbladder and biliary tract pathology

Article information

rID: 8059
Synonyms or Alternate Spellings:
  • Common bile duct stones
  • CBD stones
  • Bile duct stones
  • Stone in common bile duct

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Cases and figures

  • Case 1
    Drag here to reorder.
  • coronal
    Case 2
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 3
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 4: seen on T-tube cholangiogram
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 5
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 6
    Drag here to reorder.
  •  Case 7: on CT
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 8
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 9
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 10
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 11
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 12
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 13
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case14
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 15
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 16: on CT and MRI
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 17
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 18
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 19
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 20
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 21
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 22
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 23
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 24
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 25: with concurrent cholecystolithiasis
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 26
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 27
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 28
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 29
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 30
    Drag here to reorder.
  • case 31
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 32
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 33: post cholecystectomy
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 34
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 35
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 36: cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 37
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Updating… Please wait.

     Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

     Thank you for updating your details.