Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
Citation:
Barnsley L, Knipe H, Weerakkody Y, Critical shoulder angle. Reference article, Radiopaedia.org (Accessed on 19 Mar 2025) https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-74278
Critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a parameter that, in some studies 1, correlates with rotator cuff tears (RCT) or glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). Other studies have shown that CSA is neither associated with RCT 5,6 nor OA at 20-year follow-up 7.
The CSA measures acromial cover and the inclination of the glenoid, integrating both anatomical risk factors for RCT and OA into one biomechanical parameter 1. Moreover, the mean CSA, in combination with age and trauma, has also been demonstrated to predict the integrity of the posterosuperior rotator cuff >.
In a larger CSA, the force vector is mostly dependent on the elevating force of the deltoid muscle, which is directed upward against the rotator cuff, leading to cuff degeneration, tears, and potentially eccentric osteoarthritis 3. The resulting force vector of the deltoid muscle is more balanced on the glenoid surface when the CSA is ~33°, with a potential protective effect against degenerative shoulder conditions. In patients with a smaller CSA, the resulting force vector is unbalanced against the glenoid, favoring concentric OA 4.
CSA is the angle created between the superior and inferior bone margin of the glenoid and the most inferolateral border of the acromion. It is measured on an AP shoulder radiograph 1.
normal range: 30-35° 8
-
increased CSA: >35° 8
-
decreased CSA: <30° 8
associated with primary concentric glenohumeral OA (sensitivity 78%; specificity 97%) ref
in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability, associated with type V SLAP lesions (sensitivity 75%, specificity 77%) 8
CSA has been shown to be insensitive to minor rotations of the scapula
scapula malrotation >20°, characterized by an oval glenoid, leads to substantial overlap between the anterior and posterior glenoid rims, and the reproducibility of the CSA decreases 1
glenoid morphology, including Walch type A1 through B2, have been shown to have no significant difference in the mean CSA ref
-
1. Moor B, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh D, Sukthankar A, Gerber C. Is There an Association Between the Individual Anatomy of the Scapula and the Development of Rotator Cuff Tears or Osteoarthritis of the Glenohumeral Joint?: A Radiological Study of the Critical Shoulder Angle. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(7):935-41. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31028 - Pubmed
-
2. Moor B, Röthlisberger M, Müller D et al. Age, Trauma and the Critical Shoulder Angle Accurately Predict Supraspinatus Tendon Tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(5):489-94. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.022 - Pubmed
-
3. Gerber C, Snedeker J, Baumgartner D, Viehöfer A. Supraspinatus Tendon Load During Abduction is Dependent on the Size of the Critical Shoulder Angle: A Biomechanical Analysis. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(7):952-7. doi:10.1002/jor.22621 - Pubmed
-
4. Blonna D, Giani A, Bellato E, Mattei L, Caló M, Rossi R, et al. Predominance of the critical shoulder angle in the pathogenesis of degenerative diseases of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(8):1328-1336.
-
5. Bjarnison AO, Sørensen TJ, Kallemose T, Barfod KW. The critical shoulder angle is associated with osteoarthritis in the shoulder but not rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study. The Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017; 26(12):2097–2102.
-
6. Chalmers PN, Salazar D, Steger-May K, Chamberlain AM, Yamaguchi K, Keener JD. Does the Critical Shoulder Angle correlate with rotator cuff tear progression? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:1608–1617.
-
7. Björnsson Hallgren H & Adolfsson L. Neither Critical Shoulder Angle nor Acromion Index Were Related with Specific Pathology 20 Years Later!. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(8):2648-55. doi:10.1007/s00167-021-06602-y - Pubmed
-
8. Yaka H, Erdem T, Özer M, Kanatli U. Can the Presence of SLAP-5 Lesions Be Predicted by Using the Critical Shoulder Angle in Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability? Skeletal Radiol. 2025;54(1):49-55. doi:10.1007/s00256-024-04708-1 - Pubmed
Promoted articles (advertising)