CSF flow studies are performed using a variety of MRI techniques and are able to qualitatively assess and quantify pulsatile CSF flow. The most common technique used is time resolved 2D phase contrast MRI with velocity encoding.
Note, when referring to CSF flow in the setting on imaging we are referring to pulsatile to-and-fro flow due to vascular pulsations rather than bulk transport of CSF (the mechanism by which produced CSF is absorbed, via absorption at arachnoid granulations and via the glymphatic pathway). The latter is too slow to be easily assessed clinically.
Phase contrast technique
Time resolved 2D phase contrast imaging with velocity encoding is the most widely used method and relies upon location specific sequential application of a pair of phase encoding pulses in opposite directions. Stationary protons will experience the same pulse at both times and therefore return no signal. Protons that have moved will experience different phase encoding pulses and will thus be visible 1.
Importantly, the expected velocity of flow needs to be taken into account if aliasing artefacts are to be avoided. This expected velocity is stated as velocity encoding (VENC) and is stated in cm/s. Typical CSF flow is 5-8 cm/s. In patients with hyperdynamic circulation much higher velocities can be encountered relying on higher VENCs (up to 25 cm/s) 1.
Images are typically presented in sets of 3 for each plane and VENC obtained, similar to susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). The set comprises of 1:
re-phased image (magnitude of flow compensated signal)
- flow is of high signal
- background is visible
magnitude image (magnitude of difference signal)
- flow is of high signal (regardless of direction)
- background is suppressed
phase image (phase of difference signal)
- signal is dependent on direction: forward flow is of high signal; reverse flow is of low signal
- background is mid-grey
Quantification of flow can be generated by defining a region of interest (e.g. cross-sectional area of the aqueduct of Sylvius) and charting velocity versus time, which is typically pulsatile (e.g. forwards during systole and backwards during diastole). The area under the curve for each cardiac phase generates values of flow forwards and flow backwards.
The following clinical situations can benefit from CSF flow studies 2:
- 1. Battal B, Kocaoglu M, Bulakbasi N et-al. Cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging by using phase-contrast MR technique. Br J Radiol. 2011;84 (1004): 758-65. doi:10.1259/bjr/66206791 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 2. Mbonane S, Andronikou S. Interpretation and value of MR CSF flow studies for paediatric neurosurgery. South African Journal of Radiology. 2013;17 (1): . doi:10.4102/sajr.v17i1.208