CT perfusion in ischemic stroke
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Frank Gaillard had no recorded disclosures.View Frank Gaillard's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Andrew Murphy had no recorded disclosures.View Andrew Murphy's current disclosures
CT perfusion in ischemic stroke has become established in most centers with stroke services as an important adjunct, along with CT angiography (CTA), to conventional unenhanced CT brain imaging.
It enables differentiation of salvageable ischemic brain tissue (the penumbra) from the irrevocably damaged infarcted brain (the infarct core). This is useful when assessing a patient for treatment (thrombolysis or clot retrieval).
Although MRI is more sensitive to the early parenchymal changes of infarction (see DWI in acute stroke) its clinical application has been limited by difficulties in accessing MRI in a timely fashion in many institutions; this is especially important in this clinical setting as rapid imaging and treatment are crucial to successful intervention.
On this page:
The key to interpreting CT perfusion in the setting of acute ischemic stroke is understanding and identifying the infarct core and the ischemic penumbra, as a patient with a small core and a large penumbra is most likely to benefit from reperfusion therapies.
The three parameters typically used in determining these two areas are:
- mean transit time (MTT) or time to peak (TTP) of the deconvolved tissue residue function (Tmax) 3
- cerebral blood flow (CBF)
- cerebral blood volume (CBV)
These three parameters are related to each other according to the central volume principle: CBF = CBV/MTT 7
Normal perfusion parameters are:
- gray matter
- MTT: 4 s
- CBF: 60 mL/100 g/min
- CBV: 4 mL/100 g
- white matter
- MTT: 4.8 s
- CBF: 25 mL/100 g/min
- CBV: 2 mL/100 g
The infarct core is the part of the ischemic brain which has already infarcted or is destined to infarct regardless of therapy. It is defined as an area with prolonged MTT or Tmax, markedly decreased CBF and markedly reduced CBV 1-3 (see figure 4). Note, that if one uses CBF alone to visually assess core size, it is easy to overestimate infarct core, as the penumbra often has reduced CBF also. So, even though some automated processes used CBF to define the core, CBV is a safer parameter if 'eye-balling' the scan.
The ischemic penumbra, which in most cases surrounds the infarct core, also has prolonged MTT or Tmax but in contrast, has only moderately reduced CBF and, importantly, near-normal or even increased CBV (due to autoregulatory vasodilatation) 1-3 (see figure 3).
In patients with poor cardiac output, atrial fibrillation, severe proximal arterial stenosis or poor placement of arterial and venous density regions of interest, the decreased blood flow can lead to inaccurate perfusion maps and specifically to overestimated MTT (i.e. erroneous diagnosis of extensive ischemia or global hypoperfusion) and underestimated CBF.
CT perfusion may overestimate infarct core on admission, especially in the early time window of a stroke, by predicting lesion in areas that will not show infarct on follow-up imaging. This mismatch is known as a ghost infarct core 8.
Most CT perfusion protocols are centered upon the basal ganglia and supra-ganglionic level. This excludes a large volume of the brain, e.g. the posterior fossa and superior cerebral hemispheres.
Small infarcts (e.g. lacunar infarcts) are poorly visualized on perfusion maps due to their low resolution.
In cases of seizures, the ictal region shows hyperperfusion, which may lead to an interpretation of hypoperfusion in the contralateral hemisphere mimicking infarct.
The CBV, and to a lesser extent CBF, differentiates penumbra and core infarct:
- increased MTT/Tmax
- markedly decreased CBF
- markedly decreased CBV
- increased MTT/Tmax
- moderately reduced CBF
- near-normal or increased CBV
- 1. Srinivasan A, Goyal M, Al Azri F et-al. State-of-the-art imaging of acute stroke. Radiographics. 2006;26 Suppl 1 (suppl 1): S75-95. Radiographics (full text) - doi:10.1148/rg.26si065501 - Pubmed citation
- 2. de Lucas EM, Sánchez E, Gutiérrez A et-al. CT protocol for acute stroke: tips and tricks for general radiologists. Radiographics. 2008;28 (6): 1673-87. Radiographics (full text) - doi:10.1148/rg.286085502 - Pubmed citation
- 3. Campbell BC, Christensen S, Levi CR et-al. Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;43 (10): 2648-53. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.660548 - Pubmed citation
- 4. Konstas AA, Goldmakher GV, Lee TY et-al. Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke, part 1: Theoretic basis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30 (4): 662-8. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1487 - Pubmed citation
- 5. Konstas AA, Goldmakher GV, Lee TY et-al. Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke, part 2: technical implementations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30 (5): 885-92. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1492 - Pubmed citation
- 6. Allmendinger AM, Tang ER, Lui YW et-al. Imaging of stroke: Part 1, Perfusion CT-overview of imaging technique, interpretation pearls, and common pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198 (1): 52-62. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.7255 - Pubmed citation
- 7. Ellen G. Hoeffner, Ian Case, Rajan Jain, Sachin K. Gujar, Gaurang V. Shah, John P. Deveikis, Ruth C. Carlos, B. Gregory Thompson, Mark R. Harrigan, Suresh K. Mukherji. Cerebral Perfusion CT: Technique and Clinical Applications1. (2004) Radiology. 231 (3): 632-44. doi:10.1148/radiol.2313021488 - Pubmed
- 8. Boned S, Padroni M, Rubiera M, Tomasello A, Coscojuela P, Romero N, Muchada M, Rodríguez-Luna D, Flores A, Rodríguez N, Juega J, Pagola J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA, Ribó M. Admission CT perfusion may overestimate initial infarct core: the ghost infarct core concept. (2017) Journal of neurointerventional surgery. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012494 - Pubmed