The computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA/CTPE) is a commonly performed diagnostic examination to exclude pulmonary emboli (PE). Each radiology department will have a slightly different method for achieving the same outcome, i.e. diagnostic density of the main pulmonary artery and its branches.
There are two principal approaches for performing a CTPA of high diagnostic quality:
test bolus: a small ‘test’ quantity of contrast is injected and sequential axial slices at a set region of interest are acquired to calculate the time of peak contrast enhancement and determine an optimal scan delay
bolus tracking: sequential axial slices at a set region of interest are conducted during the contrast injection until a threshold enhancement is met, triggering a diagnostic scan 1
NB: This article is intended to outline some general principles of protocol design. The specifics will vary depending on CT hardware and software, radiologists' and referrers' preferences, institutional protocols, patient factors (e.g. allergy) and time constraints.
On this page:
Images:
Indications
pulmonary venous varix assessment
Purpose
This technique is based on the detection of filling defects in the pulmonary arterial vasculature 6, so acquisition at the right time is of vital importance. The study is optimal when the pulmonary arteries are opacified, and the aorta is not. Late acquisition will make it difficult to differentiate between pulmonary arterial and pulmonary venous branches.
Contraindications
non-compliance
Technique
Bolus tracking
-
patient position
supine with their arms above their head
-
scout
apices to diaphragm
-
scan extent
apices to diaphragm
-
scan direction
caudocranial
-
contrast injection considerations
-
monitoring slice (region of interest)
below the carina at the level of the pulmonary trunk with an ROI on the pulmonary artery
-
threshold
100 HU
-
volume
60 mL of non-ionic contrast with a 100 mL saline chaser at 4.5/5 mL/s
-
-
scan delay
minimal scan delay
-
respiration phase
inspiration
Test bolus
-
patient position
supine with their arms above their head
-
scout
apices to diaphragm
-
scan extent
apices to diaphragm
-
scan direction
caudocranial
contrast injection considerations
-
test bolus
-
contrast volume
20 mL of non-ionic contrast with a 10 mL saline chaser at 4.5/5 mL/s
-
monitoring slice (region of interest)
below the carina at the level of the pulmonary trunk with an ROI on the pulmonary artery
monitor contrast enhancement peak over time via a time-enhancement curve
-
-
calculating scan delay
-
as the time-enhancement curve will only begin recording after the scan delay; a widely accepted formula for calculating the scan delay is 1
peak contrast enhancement (time-enhancement curve) + scanner's diagnostic scan delay
-
-
contrast volume (diagnostic scan)
60 mL of non-ionic contrast with a 100 mL saline chaser at 4.5/5 mL/s
-
scan delay
peak contrast enhancement (time-enhancement curve) + scanner's diagnostic scan delay
-
respiration phase
inspiration
Practical points
-
what is considered a diagnostic CTPA based on main pulmonary artery density varies from 210 6,9 to 300 HU 5 with 250 HU a commonly accepted value 7,8
the density can be theoretically as low as 93 HU for the detection of acute PE 6
measurement should be performed with a round ROI covering at least 50% of the main pulmonary artery lumen 9
changing the scan direction to caudocranial has been shown to better demonstrate the lower lobes whilst alleviating artifact from the contrast bolus in the SVC 1
use of monoenergetic reconstruction of CTPAs with suboptimal enhancement has been shown to increase enhancement of the pulmonary trunk 3
use of high-pitch-scanning in non-obese patients can see a reduction in contrast use to as low as 12 mL 4