Developmental venous anomaly (DVA), also known as cerebral venous angioma, is a congenital malformation of veins which drain normal brain. They were thought to be rare before cross-sectional imaging but are now recognized as being the most common cerebral vascular malformation, accounting for ~55% of all such lesions.
A DVA is characterized by the caput medusae sign of veins draining into a single larger collecting vein, which in turn drains into either a dural sinus or into a deep ependymal vein. The appearance has also been likened to a palm tree.
DVAs are very common as incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 2.5-9% on contrast-enhanced MRI scans 13.
Developmental venous anomalies are usually incidental findings. However, patients can present with intracranial hemorrhage (1-5%). An association has also been described with ischemic stroke and epilepsy 8.
The etiology of developmental venous anomalies remains uncertain but may relate to arrested development of venous structures 2,3. Histologically they consist of a number of abnormally thickened veins with normal feeding arteries and capillaries 3.
Location and classification
The most common locations are:
- frontoparietal region (36-64%) 1, usually draining towards the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle
- cerebellar hemisphere (14-27%) draining towards the fourth ventricle
However, DVAs can be seen anywhere, draining either superficially or deep.
- lesions are usually solitary (75%) 2, except in blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome
- ~20% (range 8-33%) of cases 2 are associated with cavernous malformations and are referred to as mixed vascular malformations (MVM)
- venous malformations of the head and neck 2
- cortical dysplasia (uncommon) 7
Developmental venous anomalies are seen on both CT and MRI as a leash of vessels draining towards a central vein.
If large, the draining vein may be seen on non-contrast CT and is confirmed with contrast administration as a linear or curvilinear enhancing structure.
Dystrophic calcifications may be seen associated in up to 9.6% of the cases 9. This can be particularly prominent in the basal ganglia and thalami resulting in unilateral calcification 10,11.
Angiographically the caput medusae appearance (collection of dilated medullary veins converge in an enlarged transcortical or subependymal collector vein) is pathognomonic and seen only in the venous phase. Arterial phase appears normal although late capillary blush may be present. No shunting is present.
Developmental venous anomalies are often visible on most sequences but can be subtle and are most easily seen on postcontrast T1 sequences and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). If there is an associated cavernous hemangioma, then susceptibility weighted sequences will be most sensitive to this component.
Additionally, in ~10% of cases, high T2 signal will be seen in the surrounding white matter; this may be due to gliosis, edema or leukoaraiosis 12.
SWI is the preferred sequence in venous anomalies and proved to have better detectability of venous structures than conventional T2*-weighted imaging. Signals on SWI are not compromised by low-velocity venous flow. Therefore, SWI has successfully demonstrated low-flow vascular formations such as DVA. The signal intensity of veins will be low on SWI images but will vary on phase imaging depending on the vendor. It will, however, be the same as other veins and the opposite of calcification.
Treatment and prognosis
If isolated developmental venous anomalies require no treatment. If part of a mixed vascular malformation then treatment will be predicated on the other component. Informing the surgeon of the presence of a DVA is, however, essential as cautery of the collecting vein can lead to venous infarction of the brain parenchyma it drains.
When isolated, developmental venous anomalies have a very low complication rate (0.15% per annum) mainly from spontaneous thrombosis of the collecting vein leading to venous infarction and hemorrhage.
A more recent study has demonstrated that in exceedingly rare cases, the DVA can become symptomatic by various vascular complications. The authors suggested identification of the underlying pathomechanism by MR and DSA for proper management. The importance of the preserved integrity of the DVA itself still holds true 6.
Generally, the appearances will be typical and no differential should be offered. In some instances, imaging appearances may be atypical or be confounded by concurrent pathology (e.g. hemorrhage). In such cases it is worth considering:
- arteriovenous malformation
- dural sinus thrombosis or dural arteriovenous fistula with collateral transparenchymal drainage
- Sturge-Weber syndrome with leptomeningeal angiomatosis
- demyelination may also have enlarged medullary veins
- think of an associated cavernoma when a developmental venous anomaly is found in the context of an intraparenchymal hemorrhage investigation, as isolated DVAs rarely bleed
- developmental venous anomalies can be subtle on many MRI sequences; T1 C+ and SWI are most sensitive
- 1. Lee C, Pennington MA, Kenney CM. MR evaluation of developmental venous anomalies: medullary venous anatomy of venous angiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17 (1): 61-70. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 2. Boukobza M, Enjolras O, Guichard JP et-al. Cerebral developmental venous anomalies associated with head and neck venous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17 (5): 987-94. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 3. Saba PR. The caput medusae sign. Radiology. 1998;207 (3): 599-600. Radiology (citation) - Pubmed citation
- 4. Lee BC, Vo KD, Kido DK et-al. MR high-resolution blood oxygenation level-dependent venography of occult (low-flow) vascular lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20 (7): 1239-42. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 5. Santucci GM, Leach JL, Ying J et-al. Brain parenchymal signal abnormalities associated with developmental venous anomalies: detailed MR imaging assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29 (7): 1317-23. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1090 - Pubmed citation
- 6. Pereira VM, Geibprasert S, Krings T et-al. Pathomechanisms of symptomatic developmental venous anomalies. Stroke. 2008;39 (12): 3201-15. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521799 - Pubmed citation
- 7. Striano S, Nocerino C, Striano P et-al. Venous angiomas and epilepsy. Neurol. Sci. 2001;21 (3): 151-5. Pubmed citation
- 8. Hon JM, Bhattacharya JJ, Counsell CE et-al. The presentation and clinical course of intracranial developmental venous anomalies in adults: a systematic review and prospective, population-based study. Stroke. 2009;40 (6): 1980-5. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533034 - Pubmed citation
- 9. Aoki R, Srivatanakul K. Developmental Venous Anomaly: Benign or Not Benign. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 56 (9): 534-43. doi:10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0030 - Pubmed
- 10. S. Dehkharghani, W.P. Dillon, S.O. Bryant, N.J. Fischbein. Unilateral Calcification of the Caudate and Putamen: Association with Underlying Developmental Venous Anomaly. (2010) American Journal of Neuroradiology. 31 (10): 1848. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2199 - Pubmed
- 11. Ali Firat Sarp, Ozan Batki, Mustafa Fazil Gelal. Developmental Venous Anomaly With Asymmetrical Basal Ganglia Calcification: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature. (2018) Iranian Journal of Radiology. doi:10.5812/iranjradiol.16753v2 - Pubmed
- 12. G.M. Santucci, J.L. Leach, J. Ying, S.D. Leach, T.A. Tomsick. Brain Parenchymal Signal Abnormalities Associated with Developmental Venous Anomalies: Detailed MR Imaging Assessment. (2008) American Journal of Neuroradiology. 29 (7): 1317. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1090 - Pubmed
- 13. Waleed Brinjikji, Ali El-Rida El-Masri, John T. Wald, Giuseppe Lanzino. Prevalence of Developmental Venous Anomalies Increases With Age. (2017) Stroke. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.116.016145