Diagnostic certainty is a component of all cases and reflects how well the diagnosis has been established. It ranges from "possible" to "certain" and it is crucial that the certainty of a diagnosis is not overstated. Doing so only reduces the utility of the Radiopaedia case library and undermines your own credibility as a contributor.
Please be pedantic and sceptical of your own cases and strive to establish the diagnosis with supporting information.
Which diagnostic certainly level applies?
It is difficult to have a dogmatic definition for each level (see below) as this largely depends on the case. A good rule of thumb is to ask yourself this:
"Would a pedantic high-end peer-reviewed journal accept the diagnosis if you submitted it as a case report?"
In other words, would a cynical and sceptical third party agree that there was no doubt whatsoever about the diagnosis? Only if your honest answer is "yes" then, and only then, can the diagnosis be considered "Certain".
This is especially true for rare, atypical or generally unusual cases. Remembering a saying popularised by Carl Sagan "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Before we can accept a diagnostic certainty of "certain" or "almost certain" we need you to mount a compelling case, and in such instances it will require histology reports or slides, operative photos etc...
And remember, just because you feel certain does not mean you are right. This is particularly the case if you are straying outside of your comfort zone (i.e. you are relatively junior, it is an unusual case, it is outside of your area of expertise etc...). Whatever you do don't forget the Dunning-Kruger effect 1-2, which is all too alive and well in medicine.
Where is diagnostic certainty located
The user interface to set Diagnostic certainty (DC) is visible immediately below the title in case edit mode. It comprises a slider, with descriptions of each state.
The status of cases is indicated with a coloured dot (see below).
There are 5 possible levels of diagnostic certainty
Possible (red dot)
- the preferred diagnosis is one of a number of possible diagnoses, and although it is perhaps more likely, other conditions remain viable alternatives.
- cases like this are only sometimes worthwhile, but often they are not
- if you want to publish it anyway, you need to include a discussion on why you favour a particular diagnosis
- be prepared for your case to be rejected for publication; that's ok, you can always keep it as one of your unlisted cases.
- NB: it is likely that in the future we will filter out "possible" cases from search results
Probable (orange dot)
- the preferred diagnosis is far more likely (>90%) than any alternative, but the diagnosis has not been established.
- NB: it is likely that in the future we will filter out "probable" cases from search results
Almost certain (yellow dot)
- you have good reasons to believe the diagnosis was confirmed, but you do not have direct access to the proof and cannot upload it
- you collected this case some time ago and have included "path proven" in the description but not the actual histology report
- a secondary source states the diagnosis (e.g. the referral, or the treating unit or a colleague tells you the result of a biopsy) but you haven't seen the report yourself
- imaging is almost pathognomonic but it is conceivable that an unusual-appearing other entity could have similar appearances
Certain (green dot)
- the diagnosis is 100% certain based on:
- unequivocal or pathognomonic imaging appearance
- clinical, surgical or pathological proof directly obtained from a primary source by the uploader (e.g. directly from the histology report).
- where appropriate you should include substantiating evidence (e.g. histology report/slides, diagnostic laboratory test/values)
Not sure? Ask yourself this: "Would a journal accept the diagnosis if you submitted it as a case report?" In other words, would a cynical and sceptical third party agree that there was no doubt about the diagnosis? Only if your honest answer is "yes" then should the diagnosis be considered "Certain".
- the diagnosis is 100% certain based on:
- Not applicable
- the images are not of a patient with a particular diagnosis
- normal scan for teaching purposes
- diagrams, illustrations, or flow chart
How diagnostic certainty is used on the site
The diagnostic certainty of a case has many implications and functions.
Firstly it has a strong influence on case completeness, and therefore when sorting search results by case completeness cases with high DC will be favoured. Similarly, these cases will be more frequently shown in Quiz Mode.
Secondly, search results will show the DC level as a coloured dot (matching the slider).
Thirdly, search results can be (soon) filtered to only show cases of a minimum DC (e.g. at least confirmed but unsubstantiated).
- 1. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J. and Kruger, J. (2003). Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), pp.83-87.
- 2. Pennycook, G., Ross, R., Koehler, D. and Fugelsang, J. (2017). Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID: 28224482 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224482
Help and Style Guide
style guide and help
- general overview
- Radiopaedia.org supporters
- copyright/plagiarism/brand name issues
- how to use... (A-Z)
- a vs an
- accepted abbreviations
- apostrophe use and eponyms
- bulleted and numbered lists
- commas in body text lists
- dashes and hyphens
- names of individuals
- numbers, units and operators
- racial terminology
- how to use... (A-Z)
- have a play in our sandbox (test page)
- how to create an article (watch YouTube tutorial)
- types of articles
anatomy of an article
- standard article structure
- special types of articles (A-Z)
- anatomy article structure
- biographical article structure
- comparative article structure
- curriculum article structure
- examples of normal imaging article structure
- fracture article structure
- interventional procedure article structure
- medical device article structure
- mnemonics article structure
- radiography article structure
- short article structure
- summary article structure
- articles on conditions that affect multiple systems
- contributing a case to illustrate an article
- adding images to an article
- merging duplicate articles
- synonyms (watch YouTube tutorial)
- why upload cases to Radiopaedia.org
- featured cases (case of the day)
- uploaders (plugins and stand-alone apps)
- how to upload a case (watch YouTube tutorial)
- types of cases
- patient confidentiality
- case publishing guidelines
- anatomy of the perfect case
- case completeness
- quiz mode
- selection tools
- push back to draft
- case of the day guidelines
- Radiopaedia identification number (rID)
- multiple choice questions
- medical illustrations and diagrams
- Radiopaedia.org on your CV
- editorial team
- editorial projects
- Radiographics update initiative
- supported browsers