Enchondroma vs low grade chondrosarcoma

Last revised by Mostafa Elfeky on 2 Dec 2024

Distinguishing between enchondromas and low-grade conventional chondrosarcomas is often difficult due to both imaging and histological similarity.

Differentiating between them may be a moot point since both can be monitored clinically and radiologically. Pain has been regarded as an indication for surgery, however it is often impossible to be certain that the chondroid lesion is the source of pain.

Radiographic features

Useful features include:

  • size

    • lesion size over 5-6 cm favors chondrosarcoma, however size alone may not be an indicator of malignancy 8

  • cortical breach

    • seen in 88% of long-bone chondrosarcomas

    • seen in only 8% of enchondromas

  • deep endosteal scalloping involving >2/3 of cortical thickness

    • seen in 90% of chondrosarcomas

    • seen in only 10% of enchondromas

  • bone and soft tissue edema can be seen in enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma, more frequently in the latter 9

  • permeative or moth-eaten bone appearance

    • seen in high-grade chondrosarcomas, not in low-grade tumors

  • soft tissue mass beyond bone

    • not seen in enchondroma

  • increased uptake on bone scan

    • seen in 82% of chondrosarcomas

    • seen in only 21% of enchondromas

  • location

    • hands and feet are uncommon locations for chondrosarcoma

    • outside hand and feet, chondrosarcomas outnumber enchondromas 5:1

    • spine, pelvis, sacrum, and ribs are rare locations for enchondromas

  • patient age

    • enchondromas commonly appear in young adults

    • chondrosarcomas tend to appear in middle-aged patients

  • pain

    • chondrosarcomas almost always present with pain however it can be difficult or impossible to be certain that the tumor is actually the source of pain

    • enchondromas are painless unless they cause a pathological fracture