Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) refers to a clinical syndrome of painful, limited hip motion resulting from certain types of underlying morphological abnormalities in the femoral head/neck region and/or surrounding acetabulum. FAI can lead to early degenerative disease.
Pincer impingement is more common in middle-aged women, occurring at an average age of 40 years, and can occur with various disorders 2.
Cam impingement is more common in young men, occurring at an average age of 32 years 2.
In osteoarthritis of the hip, primary causes (probably genetically determined cartilage quality) are traditionally differentiated from secondary causes, such as congenital, developmental or post-traumatic deformities of the hip bones.
Recent studies suggest, however, that more subtle developmental abnormalities at the femoral head-neck junction or the acetabulum play a substantial role in cases that formerly would have been classified as primary 1.
Two basic types of joint deformities, either alone or in combination, have been identified as important causes of early degenerative disease. This can lead to three patterns of disease.
- pincer type: essentially an over-coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum
- typically becomes symptomatic in physically active young males, and refers to a bony protrusion, mostly located at the anterosuperior aspect of the femoral head-neck junction 2 just lateral to the physeal scar
- technically, the word "cam" refers to a bump on a rotating shaft that transmits force to another part of an engine
- in the case of the hip joint, this asphericity leads to unwanted force transmission to the acetabulum during flexion and internal rotation, leading to wear and tear of the labrum and cartilage 3
- combined: mixture of the two occurring together
The pistol grip deformity first described by Stulberg et al in 1975 2, is considered a typical radiographic sign of cam impingement. The shape of the proximal femur in this deformity is reminiscent of a flintlock pistol known from old pirate movies. Since the visual aspect only provides a qualitative assessment of the deformity 4, several attempts at quantification have been made for use with conventional two-plane radiographs.
In pincer type, the anterior acetabular rim projecting laterally to the posterior rim which is called "crossover sign".
Because of the three-dimensional character of the deformity, CT or MR volume imaging with secondary radial (oblique) reformats along the axis of the femoral neck is more reliable to locate and quantify the cam deformity 7. Degenerative changes of the lateral acetabular margin and subchondral cyst may be seen. Osseous bump lateral to the physeal closure is indicative of cam type. Associated labral tear and hip osteoarthritis can be identified.
The most frequently cited parameter is the alpha angle, described by Nötzli et al 5 in 2002. It is described on axial views, as the angle between a line from the centre of the femoral head through the middle of the femoral neck and a line through a point where the contour of the femoral head-neck junction exceeds the radius of the femoral head. An angle >55° is considered indicative of cam impingement 2 but some authors 16 consider an angle >60º for reduced false positive diagnoses.
A large systematic review by Wright et al 12 in 2015 concluded that increased alpha angle is the only FAI prognostic factor associated with the development of early osteoarthritis and a labral tear. However, inter- and intra-rater reliability with FAI parameters measured on conventional radiographs turned out poor in several studies 6.
MR arthrography is the most accurate imaging study to diagnose cartilage damage 8 as well as labral tears, which are highly associated with cam FAI 9. 3D gradient echo sequences have not been used much in direct MR arthrography so far. However, available results do not show a disadvantage over spin-echo sequences. Maybe, 3D MR arthrography may evolve to a one-stop-shop for measuring FAI parameters such as the alpha angle and detecting early secondary changes in symptomatic athletes, who may benefit from surgical correction of the deformity 11.
Treatment and prognosis
The natural history if untreated is for damage to acetabular cartilage leading to labral tears manifesting as anterior hip pain and progression to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Management options can range from nonoperative to operative dependent on the severity of the pathology.
- 1. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-ganz K et-al. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008;466 (2): 264-72. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 2. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188 (6): 1540-52. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.0921 - Pubmed citation
- 3. Jäger M, Wild A, Westhoff B et-al. Femoroacetabular impingement caused by a femoral osseous head-neck bump deformity: clinical, radiological, and experimental results. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9 (3): 256-63. doi:10.1007/s00776-004-0770-y - Pubmed citation
- 4. Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L et-al. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190 (5): 1260-2. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3258 - Pubmed citation
- 5. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et-al. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84 (4): 556-60. J Bone Joint Surg Br (link) - Pubmed citation
- 6. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R et-al. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009;467 (3): 666-75. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0626-4 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 7. Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch TC et-al. Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009;467 (3): 651-9. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0617-5 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation-9
- 8. Pfirrmann CW, Duc SR, Zanetti M et-al. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement. Radiology. 2008;249 (1): 236-41. doi:10.1148/radiol.2491080093 - Pubmed citation
- 9. Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E et-al. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236 (2): 588-92. doi:10.1148/radiol.2362041987 - Pubmed citation
- 10. Nepple JJ, Zebala LP, Clohisy JC. Labral disease associated with femoroacetabular impingement: do we need to correct the structural deformity? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24 (6 Suppl): 114-9. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.003 - Pubmed citation
- 11. Stoller D, Tirman P, Bredella M et-al. Diagnostic imaging. AMIRSYS. (2004) ISBN:0721629202. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 12. Wright AA, Naze GS, Kavchak AE et-al. Radiological variables associated with progression of femoroacetabular impingement of the hip: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18 (2): 122-7. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2014.03.004 - Pubmed citation
- 13. Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C et-al. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240 (3): 778-85. doi:10.1148/radiol.2403050767 - Pubmed citation
- 14. Chakraverty JK, Sullivan C, Gan C et-al. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: CT findings of features resembling femoroacetabular impingement in a young population without symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200 (2): 389-95. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8546 - Pubmed citation
- 15. Banerjee P, McLean CR. Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4 (1): 23-32. doi:10.1007/s12178-011-9073-z - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 16. Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO et-al. How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers?. Radiology. 2012;264 (2): 514-21. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112479 - Pubmed citation