Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. They account for ~5% of all sarcomas, and are mostly found within stomach and mid-distal small bowel. They respond remarkably well to chemotherapy.
Previously these tumors have been variably referred to as leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas, and leiomyoblastomas, as they were difficult to differentiate on histopathology until a characteristic expression of c-KIT and CD34 antigens was identified.
- overall uncommon when compared to gastrointestinal carcinoma, estimated ~ 0.0015% 13
- small autopsy reports suggest the incidence of tiny subclinical tumors ("tumorlets") may be as high as 23% in those over 50 years old
- usually occur after 40 years of age, most seen in older patients 1
- may present earlier and often multiple in tumor syndromes (see below)
- equal in both male and female incidence, with possible slight male predilection
- by location
- esophagus - uncommon (versus leiomyomas)
- stomach - most common site, most common gastric sarcoma
- small bowel - second most common site
- colon and rectum - most common rectal sarcoma
Clinical presentation is variable and reflects the variability of appearance, location, and biological behavior.
- small tumors are more likely to be asymptomatic, regardless of location
- tend to grow intramural, bulging intraluminal or extramural if large enough
- uncommon to cause dysphagia or bowel obstruction until very large
- larger tumors known to ulcerate and cause gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1
- may present with non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting)
- aggressive tumors may present with metastases or symptoms relating to local disease 1
GISTs are typically submucosal tumors, and the overlying mucosa often remains intact on pathological and imaging assessment.
They are believed to arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal 2-3, with 95% staining positive for CD117 (c-KIT) and 70% for CD34 2. The former is a tyrosine kinase growth factor receptor and the target of ST-571 (imatinib/Gleevec/GlivecTM) 1.
Grading GISTs requires assessment of both tumor size and mitotic index 3. Smaller lesions have less aggressive biological behavior, as do stomach GISTs when compared to tumors elsewhere along the gastrointestinal tract 3.
They are rounded with frequent hemorrhage. Larger tumors may also demonstrate necrosis and cystic change 1-2. Size is variable, ranging from 1 to 30 cm 1.
Histology demonstrates a relatively cellular tumor composed of spindle cells (70-80%) and plump epithelioid cells (20-30%) 1-2. They appear to arise from the muscularis propria layer.
The vast majority of GISTs are sporadic; however, they are recognized to occur in the following syndromes 2:
Location and classification
GISTs occur anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. Common sites of involvement include 8:
- stomach: 70% (most common gastric sarcoma)
- small intestine: 20-25%
anorectum: 7% (most common rectal sarcoma)
- more likely to be high grade 12
- esophagus (uncommon)
In addition, extra-gastrointestinal GISTs are known to occur in the mesentery, omentum, and retroperitoneum 1,4. Metastatic lesions may also be seen in cases of malignant extra-gastrointestinal GISTs 7.
Specific appearances will vary according to location (see above), but in general, these tumors appear as rounded soft tissue masses, arising from the wall of a hollow viscus (most commonly the stomach) with an endoluminal or exophytic growth. Mucosal ulceration is present in 50% of cases 1 with large necrotic cavities communicating with the lumen also seen.
When large, secondary signs of tumor may visualized by radiograph, e.g. soft tissue density displacing bowel loops.
On upper abdominal studies, filling defect projecting from the wall of the stomach may be seen, with overlying ulceration or cavitation. The tumor margins are normally seen as smooth and may form right or obtuse angles with the adjacent mucosa due to its intramural origin.
Appearances vary with size and location. Typically the mass is of soft tissue density with central areas of lower density when necrosis is present (usually in larger tumors) that occasionally appear as fluid-fluid levels.
As the tumors are often exophytic, it can be difficult to delineate them on CT if the stomach is distended with barium, though the non-enhancing central necrotic area may be helpful. A deep crescent-shaped ulceration demonstrating an internal air-fluid level may be referred to as the Torricelli-Bernoulli sign 9.
Enhancement is typically peripheral (due to central necrosis) 1. Calcification is uncommon (3%) 1.
Metastases (distant, peritoneal, omental) or direct invasion into adjacent organs may be seen in more aggressive lesions. Lymph node enlargement is not a feature 1.
The presence of necrosis, hemorrhagic and cystic change make appearances variable:
- low signal intensity solid component
- enhancement is usually present, and predominantly peripheral in larger lesions
- T2: high signal intensity solid component
Treatment and prognosis
Choi response criteria used to assess the treatment 11.
Surgical en-bloc resection is the primary mode of therapy for GISTs 4. Up to 50% of all GISTs will have evidence of metastatic disease at the time of presentation 3, which significantly impacts prognosis.
Adjuvant chemotherapy with ST-571 (imatinib) is effective in the majority of cases and has had a dramatic impact on prognosis even with only one year of therapy, reducing recurrence at one year from 17% to 3% 4. Longer treatment regimes (2-3 years of imatinib) are currently under investigation 4. Other second-line agents (e.g. sunitinib) are also being studied and used for patients with imatinib-resistant tumors.
Historically, before ST-571 (imatinib) up to 85% of tumors would locally recur or develop subsequent distal metastases despite treatment 3,4 and had proven to be resistant to standard chemotherapy 4.
FDG-PET may be used in monitoring treatment response and is considered superior to CT in monitoring treatment response in the initial phases of treatment 10.
General imaging differential considerations include:
- most common in the esophagus, accounting for 75% of mesenchymal tumors 1
- rare in the remainder of the GI tract
- gastrointestinal leiomyosarcoma: rare
gastrointestinal lymphoma / gastric lymphoma
- lymphadenopathy uncommon for GIST
- more extensive mural thickening
- there is often associated aneurysmal dilatation
- typically homogeneous attenuation
- tend to lack cystic change
- more common in small bowel
- polypoid/plaque-like growth
- mesenteric metastases with stranding (characteristic “spoke-wheel” appearance)
- 1. Levy AD, Remotti HE, Thompson WM et-al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 23 (2): 283-304, 456. doi:10.1148/rg.232025146 - Pubmed citation
- 2. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N et-al. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. W B Saunders Co. (2005) ISBN:0721601871. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 3. King DM. The radiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Cancer Imaging. 2005;5 : 150-6. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0109 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 4. Maki RG. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) and Their Management. 2007;1 (4 Suppl 2): S81-4. Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 5. Warakaulle DR, Gleeson F. MDCT appearance of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after therapy with imatinib mesylate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186 (2): 510-5. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1516 - Pubmed citation
- 6. Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Chami L et-al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187 (5): 1267-73. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.1192 - Pubmed citation
- 7. Haaga JR, Boll D. CT and MRI of the whole body. Mosby. (2009) ISBN:0323053750. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 8. Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani MMGH et-al. Primer of Diagnostic Imaging. Mosby. (2011) ISBN:0323065384. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 9. Fortman BJ. Torricelli-Bernoulli sign in an ulcerating gastric leiomyosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173 (1): 199-200. doi:10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397126 - Pubmed citation
- 10. Choi H, Charnsangavej C, de Castro Faria S et-al. CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: a quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183 (6): 1619-28. doi:10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831619 - Pubmed citation
- 11. Response Criteria in Oncologic Imaging: Review of Traditional and New Criteria Temel Tirkes, MD • Margaret A. Hollar, DO • Mark Tann, MD • Marc D. Kohli, MD • Fatih Akisik, MD • Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, MD RadioGraphics 2013; 33:1323–1341 • Published online
- 12. Tateishi U, Hasegawa T, Satake M, Moriyama N. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Correlation of computed tomography findings with tumor grade and mortality. (2003) Journal of computer assisted tomography. 27 (5): 792-8. doi:10.1097/00004728-200309000-00018 - Pubmed
- 13. Ma GL, Murphy JD, Martinez ME, Sicklick JK. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of histology codes: results of a population-based study. (2015) Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 24 (1): 298-302. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1002 - Pubmed
- 14. Agaimy A, Wünsch PH, Hofstaedter F, Blaszyk H, Rümmele P, Gaumann A, Dietmaier W, Hartmann A. Minute gastric sclerosing stromal tumors (GIST tumorlets) are common in adults and frequently show c-KIT mutations. (2007) The American journal of surgical pathology. 31 (1): 113-20. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213307.05811.f0 - Pubmed