Glasgow Coma Scale
Updates to Article Attributes
Body
was changed:
The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was developed in 1974 1 to describe the level of consciousness specifically in patients with head injury although it is now used widely as a shorthand for all manner of presentations and has generally been validated, although concerns about its use in certain scenarios 2-3.
It measures the best eye, verbal and motor responses. Each is graded from worst ( = 1=1) to best ( 4(4, 5 and 6 respecivelyrespectively) and the grades added together, such that the lowest possible score is 3 and the highest is 15.
Best eye response (E)
Graded 1-4:
- no eye opening
- eye opening in response to pain
:- patient responds to pressure on the patient’s fingernail bed
- if this does not elicit a response (or hands are unavailable) supraorbital and sternal pressure or rub may be used
- eye opening to speech
:- not to be confused with the awakening of a sleeping person (such patients receive a score of 4, not 3)
- eyes opening spontaneously
Best verbal response (V)
Graded 1-5:
- no verbal response
- incomprehensible sounds
:- groaning or moaning but no words
- inappropriate words
:- random or exclamatory articulated speech, but no conversational exchange
- confused
:- responds to questions coherently but there is some disorientation
- oriented
:- responds coherently and appropriately to questions such as the patient’s name and age, where they are and why, the year, month, etc.
Best motor response (M)
Graded 1-6
- no motor response
- extension to pain
:- extensor posturing: abduction of arm, external rotation of shoulder, supination of forearm, extension of wrist, decerebrate response
- abnormal flexion to pain
:- flexor posturing: adduction of arm, internal rotation of shoulder, pronation of forearm, flexion of wrist, decorticate response
- flexion/withdrawal to pain
:- flexion of elbow, supination of forearm, flexion of wrist when supra-orbital pressure applied; pulls part of body away when nailbed pinched
-
localizeslocalises to pain:- purposeful movements towards painful stimuli
- obeys motor commands
-<p>The <strong>Glasgow coma scale (GCS)</strong> was developed in 1974 <sup>1</sup> to describe the level of consciousness specifically in patients with head injury although it is now used widely as a shorthand for all manner of presentations and has generally been validated, although concerns about its use in certain scenarios <sup>2-3</sup>. </p><p>It measures the best eye, verbal and motor responses. Each is graded from worst ( = 1) to best ( 4, 5 and 6 respecively) and the grades added together, such that the lowest possible score is 3 and the highest is 15. </p><h4>Best eye response (E)</h4><p>Graded 1-4</p><ol>- +<p>The <strong>Glasgow coma scale (GCS)</strong> was developed in 1974 <sup>1</sup> to describe the level of consciousness specifically in patients with head injury although it is now used widely as a shorthand for all manner of presentations and has generally been validated, although concerns about its use in certain scenarios <sup>2-3</sup>. </p><p>It measures the best eye, verbal and motor responses. Each is graded from worst (=1) to best (4, 5 and 6 respectively) and the grades added together, such that the lowest possible score is 3 and the highest is 15.</p><h4>Best eye response (E)</h4><p>Graded 1-4:</p><ol>
-<li>eye opening in response to pain:<ul>- +<li>eye opening in response to pain<ul>
-<li>eye opening to speech:<ul><li>not to be confused with the awakening of a sleeping person (such patients receive a score of 4, not 3)</li></ul>- +<li>eye opening to speech<ul><li>not to be confused with the awakening of a sleeping person (such patients receive a score of 4, not 3)</li></ul>
-</ol><h4>Best verbal response (V)</h4><p>Graded 1-5</p><ol>- +</ol><h4>Best verbal response (V)</h4><p>Graded 1-5:</p><ol>
-<li>incomprehensible sounds:<ul><li>groaning or moaning but no words</li></ul>- +<li>incomprehensible sounds<ul><li>groaning or moaning but no words</li></ul>
-<li>inappropriate words:<ul><li>random or exclamatory articulated speech, but no conversational exchange</li></ul>- +<li>inappropriate words<ul><li>random or exclamatory articulated speech, but no conversational exchange</li></ul>
-<li>confused:<ul><li>responds to questions coherently but there is some disorientation </li></ul>- +<li>confused<ul><li>responds to questions coherently but there is some disorientation </li></ul>
-<li>oriented:<ul><li>responds coherently and appropriately to questions such as the patient’s name and age, where they are and why, the year, month, etc.</li></ul>- +<li>oriented<ul><li>responds coherently and appropriately to questions such as the patient’s name and age, where they are and why, the year, month, etc.</li></ul>
-<li>extension to pain:<ul><li>extensor posturing: abduction of arm, external rotation of shoulder, supination of forearm, extension of wrist, decerebrate response</li></ul>- +<li>extension to pain<ul><li>extensor posturing: abduction of arm, external rotation of shoulder, supination of forearm, extension of wrist, decerebrate response</li></ul>
-<li>abnormal flexion to pain:<ul><li>flexor posturing: adduction of arm, internal rotation of shoulder, pronation of forearm, flexion of wrist, decorticate response</li></ul>- +<li>abnormal flexion to pain<ul><li>flexor posturing: adduction of arm, internal rotation of shoulder, pronation of forearm, flexion of wrist, decorticate response</li></ul>
-<li>flexion/withdrawal to pain:<ul><li>flexion of elbow, supination of forearm, flexion of wrist when supra-orbital pressure applied; pulls part of body away when nailbed pinched</li></ul>- +<li>flexion/withdrawal to pain<ul><li>flexion of elbow, supination of forearm, flexion of wrist when supra-orbital pressure applied; pulls part of body away when nailbed pinched</li></ul>
-<li>localizes to pain:<ul><li>purposeful movements towards painful stimuli</li></ul>- +<li>localises to pain<ul><li>purposeful movements towards painful stimuli</li></ul>