Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary intracranial neoplasm (see brain tumours), accounting for 15% of all intracranial neoplasms and approximately 50% of all astrocytomas. GBMs are high grade astrocytomas; they are therefore generally aggressive, largely resistant to therapy, and have a corresponding poor prognosis.
Glioblastoma was previously known as glioblastoma multiforme; the multiforme refers to the tumour heterogeneity. The WHO classification has dropped the 'multiforme' and thus it is best to refer to these tumours merely as glioblastomas. Somewhat confusingly the abbreviation GBM is still considered appropriate 16.
Primary vs secondary
Glioblastomas have traditionally been divided into primary and secondary; the former arising de novo (90%) whereas the later developed from a pre-existing lower grade tumour (10%).
These correlate closely to IDH mutation status:
- IDH mutant: generally secondary glioblastoma, almost always MGMT methylated 17
- IDH wild-type: generally primary glioblastoma
If IDH status is unavailable or indeterminate then currently the diagnosis of glioblastoma NOS (not otherwise specified) should be made 16.
Primary glioblastomas are those that arise de novo, without a pre-existing lower grade diffuse astrocytoma. They account for 90% of all glioblastomas and are more aggressive than secondary glioblastomas and they tend to occur in older individuals.
Secondary glioblastomas, in contrast, are those which arise from a pre-existing lower grade diffuse astrocytoma. They are relatively uncommon, only accounting for approximately 10% of all glioblastomas. These tumours tend to be less aggressive than primary glioblastomas and they tend to occur in younger patients 7,16. Interestingly, and of uncertain significance, they have a predilection for the frontal lobes 16.
Characteristically, and unlike primary tumours, secondary glioblastomas tend to be IDH mutant (positive), a mutation shared by over 80% of grade II and III astrocytomas 7,8. Secondary glioblastomas also demonstrate p53 mutations, amplification of PDGF-A, loss of heterozygosity of chromosomes 10q and 17p, loss of 19q and increased telomerase activity and hTERT expression 7.
In the current (2016) WHO classification of CNS tumours, three glioblastoma histological variants are recognised (which are discussed separately) as well as a number of histological patterns which are discussed below 16.
The three recognised variants are:
The remainder of this article concerns itself with primary (IDH wild-type) glioblastoma.
A glioblastoma may occur at any age, however, they usually occur after the age of 40 years with a peak incidence between 65 and 75 years of age. There is a slight male preponderance with a 3:2 M:F ratio 5. Caucasians are affected more frequently than other ethnicities: Europe and North America 3-4 per 100,000 whereas Asia 0.59 per 100,000 16.
The vast majority of glioblastomas are sporadic. Rarely they are related to prior radiation exposure (radiation-induced GBM). They can also occur as part of rare inherited tumour syndromes, such as p53 mutation related syndromes such as neurofibromatosis type1 (NF1) and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Other syndromes in which GBMs are encountered include Turcot syndrome, Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome.
Typically patients present in one of three ways:
- focal neurological deficit
- symptoms of increased intracranial pressure
Rarely (<2%) intratumoral haemorrhage occurs and patients may present acutely with stroke-like symptoms and signs.
Although glioblastomas can arise anywhere within the brain, they have a predilection for the subcortical white matter and deep grey matter of the cerebral hemispheres, particularly the temporal lobe 16.
Glioblastomas are typically poorly-marginated, diffusely infiltrating necrotic masses localised to the cerebral hemispheres. The supratentorial white matter is the most common location.
These tumours may be firm or gelatinous. Considerable regional variation in appearance is characteristic. Some areas are firm and white, some are soft and yellow (secondary to necrosis), and still other are cystic with local haemorrhage. GBMs have a significant variability in size from only a few centimetres to lesions that replace a hemisphere. Infiltration beyond the visible tumour margin is always present.
Pleomorphic astrocytes with marked atypia and numerous mitoses are seen. Necrosis and microvascular proliferation are hallmarks of glioblastomas (see WHO grading of astrocytomas).
Microvascular proliferation results in an abundance of new vessels with a poorly formed blood-brain barrier (BBB) permitting the leakage of iodinated CT contrast and gadolinium into the adjacent extracellular interstitium resulting in the observed enhancement on CT and MRI respectively 11.
Oedema and enhancement are however also seen in lower grade tumours that lack endovascular proliferation (anaplastic astrocytoma and other diffuse astrocytomas, for example, gemistocytic astrocytomas) and this is thought to be due to disruption of the normal blood-brain barrier by tumour produced factors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for example has been shown to both disrupt tight junctions between endothelial cells and increase the formation of fenestrations 12.
Glioblastomas are capable of demonstrating varied patterns, sometimes within the one tumour. In addition to the three recognised variants (giant cell glioblastoma, gliosarcoma and epithelioid glioblastoma) additional histological features are sometimes encountered which impact on imaging appearance and biological behaviour. Most of these are seen predominantly in primary IDH wild-type glioblastomas. These include 16:
- more commonly seen in secondary IDH mutant glioblastoma arising from a pre-existing gemistocytic astrocytoma
- granular cells
- histologically mimic macrophages and thus can lead to a misdiagnosis of macrophage-rich demyelination
- lipidized cells
- most commonly squamous epithelium
- if dominant feature then a diagnosis of gliosarcoma should be considered
- multinucleated giant cells
- a common feature of glioblastoma
- if they are the dominant feature then a diagnosis of giant cell glioblastoma should be considered
- oligodendroglioma component
- primitive neuronal cells
- previously known as glioblastoma with PNET-like component
- more frequently has CSF spread
- MYC or MYCN amplification common
- IDH mutant in 15-20% of cases
- small cell glioblastoma
- histologically appears similar to oligodendroglioma cell, but are IDH wild-type and commonly usually demonstrate EGFR amplification
- like oligodendrogliomas, they have a predilection for extensive cortical involvement
- GFAP: positive but of variable intensity
- S100: positive
- nestin: positive
- p53 protein: positive if TP53 mutated
- EGFR: positive in 40-98% of cases 16
- IDH-1 R132H: negative (by definition, otherwise not an IDH wild-type GBM, but rather a secondary IDH mutant tumour) 16
- H3 K27M mutation: negative (if positive then diffuse midline glioma H3 K27M-mutant)
As discussed above, the vast majority of glioblastomas are primary and are IDH wild-type. IDH mutations are more common, and perhaps synonymous of, secondary glioblastomas (those arising from a pre-existing lower grade diffuse astrocytoma) 8,16.
Glioblastomas are typically large tumours at diagnosis. They often have thick, irregular-enhancing margins and a central necrotic core, which may also have a haemorrhagic component. They are surrounded by vasogenic-type oedema, which in fact usually contains infiltration by neoplastic cells.
Multifocal disease, which is found in ~20% of cases, is that where multiple areas of enhancement are connected to each other by abnormal white matter signal, which represents microscopic spread to tumour cells. Multicentric disease, on the other hand, is where no such connection can be seen.
- irregular thick margins: iso to slightly hyperattenuating (high cellularity)
- irregular hypodense centre representing necrosis
- marked mass effect
- surrounding vasogenic oedema
- haemorrhage is occasionally seen
- calcification is uncommon
- intense irregular, heterogeneous enhancement of the margins is almost always present
- hypo to isointense mass within white matter
- central heterogeneous signal (necrosis, intratumoural haemorrhage)
T1 C+ (Gd)
- enhancement is variable but is almost always present
- typically peripheral and irregular with nodular components
- usually surrounds necrosis
- surrounded by vasogenic oedema
- flow voids are occasionally seen
- susceptibility artefact on T2* from blood products (or occasionally calcification)
- Low-intensity rim from blood product 6
- incomplete and irregular in 85% when present
- mostly located inside the peripheral enhancing component
- absent dual rim sign
- solid component
- elevated signal on DWI is common in solid/enhancing component
- diffusion restriction is typically intermediate similar to normal white matter, but significantly elevated compared to surrounding vasogenic oedema (which has facilitated diffusion)
- ADC values correlate with grade 13
- WHO IV (GBM) = 745 ± 135 x 10-6 mm2/s
- WHO III (anaplastic) = 1067 ± 276 x 10-6 mm2/s
- WHO II (low grade) = 1273 ± 293 x 10-6 mm2/s
- ADC threshold value of 1185 x 10-6 mm2/s sensitivity (97.6%) and specificity (53.1%) in the discrimination of high-grade (WHO grade III & IV) and low-grade (WHO grade II) gliomas 13
- non-enhancing necrotic/cystic component
- the vast majority (>90%) have facilitated diffusion (ADC values >1000 x 10-6 mm2/s)
- care must be taken in interpreting cavities with blood product
- solid component
- MR perfusion: rCBV elevated compared to lower grade tumours and normal brain
- typical spectroscopic characteristics include
- choline: increased
- lactate: increased
- lipids: increased
- NAA: decreased
- myoinositol: decreased
- typical spectroscopic characteristics include
PET demonstrates accumulation of FDG (representing increased glucose metabolism) which typically is greater than or similar to metabolism in grey matter.
When reporting a new diagnosis of a mass that is likely a glioblastoma, it is useful to include:
- size in three dimensions
- degree of central necrosis
- non-enhancing tumour involving cortex, deep grey or white matter: look at ADC for lower values
- presence of necrosis
- relationship to/involvement of
- eloquent areas
- major white matter tract
- large vessels
- across midline
- into brainstem
- subependymal spread
- CSF dissemination
Treatment and prognosis
Biopsy and tumour debulking with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (temozolomide) are the most commonly carried out treatment. In individuals of 70 years of age or younger standard Stupp protocol is usual. In older individuals, the radiotherapy is usually shorter course, but even in this setting adding temozolomide) significantly increases survival, especially in MGMT methylated (inactive) tumours 15.
Despite this, it carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of fewer than 2 years 15.
Negative prognostic factors include:
- the degree of necrosis 10
- the degree of enhancement 10
- deep location (e.g. thalamus)
- MGMT not-methylated
- increased age
- lower pre-diagnosis functional status (e.g. ECOG performance status)
Response assessment criteria
Glioblastomas have been the subject of close trial scrutiny with many new chemotherapeutic agents showing promise. As such a number of criteria have been created over the years to assess response to treatment. Currently, the RANO criteria are most widely used. Other historical systems are worth knowing to allow interpretation of older data. These systems for response criteria for first-line treatment of glioblastomas include 9:
History and etymology
The original term glioblastoma multiforme was coined in 1926 by Percival Bailey and Harvey Cushing; the suffix multiforme was meant to describe the various appearances of haemorrhage, necrosis, and cysts.
General imaging differential considerations include:
- may look identical
- both may appear multifocal
- metastases usually are centred on grey-white matter junction and spare the overlying cortex
- rCBV in the 'oedema' will be reduced
primary CNS lymphoma
- should be considered especially in patients with AIDS, as in this setting central necrosis is more common
- otherwise usually homogeneously enhancing
- central restricted diffusion is helpful, however, if GBM is hemorrhagic then assessment may be difficult
- presence of smooth and complete SWI low-intensity rim 6
- presence of dual rim sign 6
- should not have central necrosis
- consider histology sampling bias
- can appear similar
- often has an open ring pattern of enhancement
- usually younger patients
- subacute cerebral infarction
- history is essential in suggesting the diagnosis
- should not have elevated choline
- should not have elevated rCBV
- cerebral toxoplasmosis
- 1. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N et-al. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. W B Saunders Co. (2005) ISBN:0721601871. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 2. Rees JH, Smirniotopoulos JG, Jones RV et-al. Glioblastoma multiforme: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1996;16 (6): 1413-38. Radiographics (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 3. Krex D, Klink B, Hartmann C et-al. Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain. 2007;130 (Pt): 2596-606. doi:10.1093/brain/awm204 - Pubmed citation
- 4. Jung CS, Foerch C, Schänzer A et-al. Serum GFAP is a diagnostic marker for glioblastoma multiforme. Brain. 2007;130 (Pt): 3336-41. doi:10.1093/brain/awm263 - Pubmed citation
- 5. Dähnert W. Radiology review manual. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2003) ISBN:0781738954. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 6. Toh CH, Wei KC, Chang CN et-al. Differentiation of pyogenic brain abscesses from necrotic glioblastomas with use of susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33 (8): 1534-8. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (full text) - doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2986 - Pubmed citation
- 7. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19 (4): 764-72. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3002 - Pubmed citation
- 8. Osborns Brain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN:1931884218. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 9. Chinot OL, Macdonald DR, Abrey LE et-al. Response assessment criteria for glioblastoma: practical adaptation and implementation in clinical trials of antiangiogenic therapy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13 (5): 347. doi:10.1007/s11910-013-0347-2 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 10. Hammoud MA, Sawaya R, Shi W et-al. Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 1996;27 (1): 65-73. Pubmed citation
- 11. Zagzag D, Goldenberg M, Brem S. Angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier breakdown modulate CT contrast enhancement: an experimental study in a rabbit brain-tumor model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153 (1): 141-6. doi:10.2214/ajr.153.1.141 - Pubmed citation
- 12. Zhao LN, Yang ZH, Liu YH et-al. Vascular endothelial growth factor increases permeability of the blood-tumor barrier via caveolae-mediated transcellular pathway. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2011;44 (2): 122-9. doi:10.1007/s12031-010-9487-x - Pubmed citation
- 13. Hilario A, Ramos A, Perez-Nuñez A et-al. The added value of apparent diffusion coefficient to cerebral blood volume in the preoperative grading of diffuse gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33 (4): 701-7. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2846 - Pubmed citation
- 14. Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, Walsh KM, Decker PA, Sicotte H, Pekmezci M, Rice T, Kosel ML, Smirnov IV, Sarkar G, Caron AA, Kollmeyer TM, Praska CE, Chada AR, Halder C, Hansen HM, McCoy LS, Bracci PM, Marshall R, Zheng S, Reis GF, Pico AR, O'Neill BP, Buckner JC, Giannini C, Huse JT, Perry A, Tihan T, Berger MS, Chang SM, Prados MD, Wiemels J, Wiencke JK, Wrensch MR, Jenkins RB. Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors. The New England journal of medicine. 372 (26): 2499-508. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1407279 - Pubmed
- 15. Perry JR, Laperriere N, O'Callaghan CJ, Brandes AA, Menten J, Phillips C, Fay M, Nishikawa R, Cairncross JG, Roa W, Osoba D, Rossiter JP, Sahgal A, Hirte H, Laigle-Donadey F, Franceschi E, Chinot O, Golfinopoulos V, Fariselli L, Wick A, Feuvret L, Back M, Tills M, Winch C, Baumert BG, Wick W, Ding K, Mason WP. Short-Course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma. The New England journal of medicine. 376 (11): 1027-1037. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1611977 - Pubmed
- 16. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et-al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114 (2): 97-109. Acta Neuropathol. (full text) - doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 17. Mulholland S, Pearson DM, Hamoudi RA, Malley DS, Smith CM, Weaver JM, Jones DT, Kocialkowski S, Bäcklund LM, Collins VP, Ichimura K. MGMT CpG island is invariably methylated in adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. International journal of cancer. 131 (5): 1104-13. doi:10.1002/ijc.26499 - Pubmed
- 18. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta neuropathologica. 131 (6): 803-20. doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 - Pubmed
- WHO classification of CNS tumours
- WHO grading of CNS tumours
- VASARI MRI feature set
- diffuse astrocytoma grading
- grade I:
- grade II:
- grade III
- grade IV:
- glioblastoma vs cerebral metastasis
- radiation-induced gliomas
- gliomatosis cerebri (growth pattern)
- specific locations
- treatment response
- Stupp protocol
- glioma treatment response assessment in clinical trials
- multicentric glioblastoma
- multifocal glioblastoma
- prognostic genetic markers