Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Yuranga Weerakkody had no recorded disclosures.View Yuranga Weerakkody's current disclosures
Gliosarcoma is a classic variant of glioblastoma (along with epithelioid glioblastoma and giant cell glioblastoma) which, although not a distinct diagnosis, remains recognized in the current (2021) WHO classification of CNS tumors as a variant of glioblastoma 9. They are highly malignant (WHO grade 4) primary intra-axial neoplasms with both glial and mesenchymal elements.
The vast majority of gliosarcomas arise from WHO grade 4 astrocytomas (i.e. glioblastoma), however, rarely they can also arise from ependymomas or oligodendrogliomas in which case they can be referred to as ependymosarcomas and oligosarcomas respectively 8.
Peak presentation is around the 6th decade and there is a male predilection (M:F 1.8:1) 1,8. Most tumors are primary but secondary tumors can occur in patients with previously resected glioblastomas or cranial irradiation.
Gliosarcomas are very similar to glioblastomas but with an added sarcomatous component. Although the tumor comprises both glial and mesenchymal elements, there is evidence that both components arise from a solitary precursor cell 8.
They are almost invariably found in the cerebral hemispheres, and there may be slight predilection towards the temporal lobes 1,8.
These tumors vary in appearance depending on the relative amounts of sarcomatous tissue and astrocytic tissue. When the former is dominant, then these lesions appear similar to metastases; well-circumscribed and firm. When the astrocytic component is abundant, then appearances are identical to a glioblastoma 8.
Microscopically, these tumors show both an astrocytic component identical to glioblastomas and a sarcomatous component which is varied in differentiation, typically with epithelial components forming squamous tissue or gland-like structures 8. Differentiation into may other types of tissue is also occasionally encountered (cartilage, bone, adipose, muscle) 8.
Gliosarcomas can be very similar to glioblastomas in appearance. They are usually broad-based peripherally located lesions with possible direct dural invasion or only reactive dural thickening (dural tail) 3-7.
Gliosarcomas may be seen on CT as a sharply defined (often due to sarcomatous component 5), round or lobulated, hyperdense solid mass. They can have relatively homogeneous contrast enhancement and peritumoral edema.
Reported signal characteristics include:
T1: heterogeneous and hypointense mass
T2: heterogeneous signal due to hemorrhagic and necrotic components
T1C+ (Gd): thick irregular and rim-like or ring enhancement
On angiography, mixed dural and pial vascular supply may be present 3. Early cortical venous drainage, irregular tumor vessels, and a prominent vascular stain with well-defined tumor margins may also be seen.
Treatment and prognosis
As with glioblastomas, this tumor carries a very poor prognosis. Extracranial metastases can occur in up to 30% of cases.
General imaging differential considerations include:
- 1. Kozak K, Mahadevan A, Moody J. Adult Gliosarcoma: Epidemiology, Natural History, and Factors Associated with Outcome. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(2):183-91. doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-076 - Pubmed
- 2. Maiuri F, Stella L, Benvenuti D, Giamundo A, Pettinato G. Cerebral Gliosarcomas: Correlation of Computed Tomographic Findings, Surgical Aspect, Pathological Features, and Prognosis. Neurosurgery. 1990;26(2):261-7. - Pubmed
- 3. Jack C, Bhansali D, Chason J et al. Angiographic Features of Gliosarcoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1987;8(1):117-22. PMC8334040 - Pubmed
- 4. Galanis E, Buckner J, Dinapoli R et al. Clinical Outcome of Gliosarcoma Compared with Glioblastoma Multiforme: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Results. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(3):425-30. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.3.0425 - Pubmed
- 5. Lutterbach J, Guttenberger R, Pagenstecher A. Gliosarcoma: A Clinical Study. Radiother Oncol. 2001;61(1):57-64. doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00415-7 - Pubmed
- 6. Lee Y, Castillo M, Nauert C, Moser R. Computed Tomography of Gliosarcoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1985;6(4):527-31. PMC8335194 - Pubmed
- 7. Chourmouzi D, Potsi S, Moumtzouoglou A et al. Dural Lesions Mimicking Meningiomas: A Pictorial Essay. World J Radiol. 2012;4(3):75-82. doi:10.4329/wjr.v4.i3.75 - Pubmed
- 8. Louis D, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O et al. The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114(2):97-109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 - Pubmed
- 9. Louis D, Perry A, Wesseling P et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Neuro-Oncology. 2021;23(8):1231-51. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab106 - Pubmed