Granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Yuranga Weerakkody had no recorded disclosures.View Yuranga Weerakkody's current disclosures
Granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis, sometimes termed granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis, is a form of invasive fungal sinusitis. Reports describing the imaging findings have been uncommon 1.
It is rare and has been mainly reported in North Africa, Middle East and Asia, it is rarely seen in the Western world 2,6.
Granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis has been reported to affect both immunocompromised as well as immunocompetent
This disease presents with a focal expanding granulomatous mass arising from the sinonasal region, locally aggressive, destroying adjacent structures.
Clinical presentation is mainly due to the mass effect, with possible nasal obstruction or proptosis. If there is intracranial invasion, it tends to have scarce symptoms due to the slow growth. The disease often presents late, at advanced stages, due to the initial paucity of symptoms.
Granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is usually confirmed on the basis of clinical and histopathologic findings where there is non-caseating granuloma formation and fibrosis. It is usually caused by Aspergillus flavus.
Affected individuals are generally immunocompetent (unlike other forms of invasive sinusitis, which affect mainly immunocompromised individuals).
Imaging shows a large expansive mass with bone destruction and invasion of adjacent structures including orbits, nasal cavity and cranial base.
CT optimally demonstrates the degree of bone destruction. The mass is typically intrinsically hyperdense, with homogeneous contrast enhancement.
MRI demonstrates the same intense pattern of intense, homogeneous enhancement. The most salient MRI finding is a characteristic T2 hypointensity, along with peripheral foci of susceptibility, due to the deposition of paramagnetic elements. DWI may show a “T2-blackout” effect secondary to the marked T2 hypodensity, which may limit the value of diffusion sequences. Often described are foci of enhancing parenchyma representing cerebritis, in the region of the brain immediately adjacent to the solid lesion 3,4.
Treatment and prognosis
There is scarce evidence regarding optimal management and follow up in the literature. However, generally initial conservative surgical excision of the mass is generally indicated, followed by medical treatment with antifungal agents (itraconazole/voriconazole), which appear to decrease the degree of disease relapse.
Prognosis is generally good, especially if there is no intracranial invasion.
Post-surgical relapse is common, especially if antifungal therapy is not established 5.
sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: often similar in appearance should always be considered in sinonasal malignancy
sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma: mostly affects maxillary sinus and nasal cavity; very high propensity for perineural tumor spread
sinonasal adenocarcinoma: more aggressive, heterogeneous enhancement pattern; classically described in wood-workers (intestinal subtype)
sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC): mostly affects ethmoid and nasal cavity; early nodal metastases
sinonasal lymphoma: mainly affects paranasal sinuses and simulates benignity, with frequent bone remodeling more than destruction; homogeneous contrast-enhancement with homogeneous diffusion restriction, with scarce or no necrosis, are characteristic
sinonasal melanoma: mainly affects the inferior nasal fossa; lesions are characteristically hypervascular and hemorrhagic; can sometimes simulate benignancy, with frequent bone remodeling instead of destruction; if the tumor is the melanotic subtype, they can have a slight characteristic T1 hyperintensity
esthesioneuroblastoma: centered on the cribriform plate, with characteristic dumbbell shape affecting ethmoid sinuses inferiorly and invading anterior cranial fossa superiorly; often show adjacent bone hyperostosis, bone remodeling and nasal cavity expansion; intracranial tumor-margins often show characteristic peripheral T2-hyperintense cysts
- 1. Aribandi M, McCoy VA, Bazan C. Imaging features of invasive and noninvasive fungal sinusitis: a review. Radiographics. 2007;27 (5): 1283-96. doi:10.1148/rg.275065189 - Pubmed citation
- 2. Kim TH, Jang HU, Jung YY et-al. Granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis extending into the pterygopalatine fossa and orbital floor: A case report. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2012;1 (1): 107-11. doi:10.1016/j.mmcr.2012.10.004 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 3. Siddiqui AA, Bashir SH, Ali Shah A, et al. Diagnostic MR imaging features of craniocerebral Aspergillosis of sino-nasal origin in immunocompetent patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 155–66; discussion 166. doi:10.1007/s00701-005-0659-3 Pubmed citation
- 4. Reddy CEE, Gupta AK, Singh P, et al. Imaging of granulomatous and chronic invasive fungal sinusitis: comparison with allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 143: 294–300. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.027
- 5. Halderman A, Shrestha R, Sindwani R. Chronic granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis: an evolving approach to management. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4: 280–3. doi:10.1002/alr.21299
- 6. Deutsch P, Whittaker J, Prasad S. Invasive and Non-Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis—A Review and Update of the Evidence. Medicina. 2019;55(7):319. doi:10.3390/medicina55070319 - Pubmed