Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created The Radswiki had no recorded disclosures.View The Radswiki's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Ashesh Ishwarlal Ranchod had no financial relationships to ineligible companies to disclose.View Ashesh Ishwarlal Ranchod's current disclosures
Hallux limitus is distinct from hallux rigidus, the former referring to the functional pain secondary to lack of flexibility of the soft tissue structures, e.g. spasm of the gastrocnemius. Nevertheless, hallux limitus is thought to be a risk factor for hallux rigidus, therefore features of both conditions may co-occur 6.
It is most commonly seen in middle-aged patients but can develop during adolescence. Unlike a hallux valgus, males appear to be slightly more affected than females.
The diagnosis of hallux rigidus is based on 1:
- first MTP joint pain
- clinical findings of decreased dorsiflexion (<30°) and palpable osteophytes
Patients present with foot pain. The disability resulting from hallux rigidus is actually greater than that seen in hallux valgus because dorsiflexion at the metatarsophalangeal joint is severely restricted and painful. Removal of shoes does not relieve the pain 1.
The hallmark is osteoarthritis of the first MTP joint, which can be seen on many modalities 1,8. Widening of the first metatarsal head is an additional finding whereas associated hallux valgus and the significance of the first metatarsal length are debated 2.
Relative dorsal elevation of the first metatarsal to the lesser metatarsals (metatarsus primus elevatus) may be present but is debated whether it is causative or secondary 2,9.
The grading system by Hattrup and Johnson is a radiographic classification that is commonly used ref:
- grade 1: mild to moderate osteophyte formation but with good joint space preservation
- grade 2: moderate osteophyte formation with joint space narrowing and subchondral sclerosis
- grade 3: marked osteophyte formation and loss of the visible joint space, +/- subchondral cyst formation
An alternative is the grading system by Coughlin and Shurnass 3:
- dorsiflexion 40-60°
- normal plain radiograph
- no pain
- dorsiflexion 30-40°
- dorsal osteophytes
- minimal or no other joint changes
- dorsiflexion 10-30°
- mild to moderate joint narrowing or sclerosis
- presence of osteophytes
- dorsiflexion less than 10°
- severe radiographic changes
- constant moderate to severe pain at extremities
- grade 4
Treatment and prognosis
Surgical treatments include osteophyte resection (cheilectomy) and capsular release, arthrodesis or arthroplasty 7.
- 1. Karasick D & Wapner K. Hallux Rigidus Deformity: Radiologic Assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(5):1029-33. doi:10.2214/ajr.157.5.1927789 - Pubmed
- 2. Coughlin M & Shurnas P. Hallux Rigidus: Demographics, Etiology, and Radiographic Assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(10):731-43. doi:10.1177/107110070302401002 - Pubmed
- 3. Coughlin M & Shurnas P. Hallux Rigidus. Grading and Long-Term Results of Operative Treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(11):2072-88. - Pubmed
- 4. Camasta C. Hallux Limitus and Hallux Rigidus. Clinical Examination, Radiographic Findings, and Natural History. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1996;13(3):423-48. - Pubmed
- 5. Hattrup S & Johnson K. Subjective Results of Hallux Rigidus Following Treatment with Cheilectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(226):182-91. - Pubmed
- 6. Lam A, Chan J, Surace M, Vulcano E. Hallux Rigidus: How Do I Approach It? World J Orthop. 2017;8(5):364-71. doi:10.5312/wjo.v8.i5.364 - Pubmed
- 7. Hallinan J, Statum S, Huang B et al. High-Resolution MRI of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: Gross Anatomy and Injury Characterization. Radiographics. 2020;40(4):1107-24. doi:10.1148/rg.2020190145 - Pubmed
- 8. Schweitzer M, Maheshwari S, Shabshin N. Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus. Clin Imaging. 1999;23(6):397-402. doi:10.1016/s0899-7071(00)00167-4
- 9. Bouaicha S, Ehrmann C, Moor B, Maquieira G, Espinosa N. Radiographic Analysis of Metatarsus Primus Elevatus and Hallux Rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(9):807-14. doi:10.3113/fai.2010.0807 - Pubmed