Citation, DOI & article data
Intraosseous lipomas are rare benign lesions that account for about 0.1-2.5% of all bone tumors. It is, however, the most common lipogenic tumor in bone 6.
It can present in an extremely wide age range (5-85 years) although the peak age at discovery is usually in the 4-5th decades of life. There may be a slight male predilection 6. There is a male predilection (M:F ~1.3:1) with the mean age at diagnosis 50 years, although they can present at any stage of adult life 8.
Diagnostic criteria according to the WHO classification of soft tissue and bone tumors (5th edition) 8:
- essential: bone tumor with clusters of mature-appearing adipocytes with correlative imaging
Aching pain is the leading symptom in the majority (70%) of cases, but more than 30% of bone lipomas are found incidentally on imaging studies done for other reasons 1,8.
The etiology and pathogenesis are unknown 8. Intraosseous lipomas are located almost exclusively within the medullary cavity, usually of long bones, and usually measure 3-5 cm although can be >10 cm 8. They are composed of mature adipocytes without admixed hematopoietic tissue or bony trabeculae 7.
Although intraosseous lipomas can be found essentially anywhere within the skeleton, the lower limb accounts for the majority of cases. When located in long bones, they tend to be found in the metaphysis 1,7,8:
- lower limb: ~70%
- calcaneum: 32% (considered the most frequent calcaneal bone lesion)
- femur: 20% (especially the intertrochanteric region)
- tibia: 13%
- fibula: 6%
- upper limb: 7%
- skull and mandible: 7%
- spine and pelvis: 12%
- ribs: 2.5%
The radiographic appearance of intraosseous lipomas has a broad differential diagnosis, which includes many benign bone lesions. It may be typically seen as a rather benign-appearing osteolytic bone lesion with well-defined margins. Central calcification may develop creating the cockade sign.
By CT attenuation or MRI signal characteristics, the differential diagnosis can be narrowed down to fat-containing lesions of the bone. The fatty components of intraosseous lipomas may display varying degrees of involution and necrosis. Based on these features, Milgram and co-workers 2 proposed three categories:
- stage 1: sharply delineated, viable lipomas with homogeneous fat content
- stage 2: predominantly fatty lesions with central necroses, calcifications or ossifications
- stage 3: heterogeneous, fat-containing lesions with multiple necroses, cystic transformations, wall sclerosis and extensive calcifications or ossifications.
Accordingly, stage 1 lesions show homogeneous hyperintense fat signal on T1- and T2-weighted MR images that will be entirely suppressed by STIR or fat-saturated sequences. The trabecular cancellous bone pattern is typically absent within the lesion.
Stage 2 lesions show hypointense inclusions on T1-weighted images, which may appear hyperintense on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (granulation tissue/necrosis) or hypointense (calcifications or ossifications).
In addition to the signal characteristics of stage 2 lesions, stage 3 lesions may contain fluid-equivalent cavities and signal-void bony septa and are surrounded by thickened, signal-void rims of sclerotic bone. Although there are typically no signs of aggressive behavior, expansile intraosseous lipomas may outgrow the cortical border. This can be used to differentiate them from older bone infarcts, which may also develop cystic degeneration over time. Moreover, in intraosseous lipomas, T2-hyperintense granulation tissue of central necrosis is surrounded by viable fat tissue. Conversely, in bone infarcts, fat tissue in the center is surrounded by granulation tissue at the periphery. However, in cases with substantial secondary involution and necrosis, biopsy may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis 3.
Treatment and prognosis
Intraosseous lipomas that do not affect bone stability may be treated conservatively. Symptomatic cases or those with imminent fractures are treated by curettage 8 and bone grafting. There are no recurrences after surgical therapy 8. However, malignant transformations have been sporadically described 1.
- 1. Campbell R, Grainger A, Mangham D, Beggs I, Teh J, Davies A. Intraosseous Lipoma: Report of 35 New Cases and a Review of the Literature. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32(4):209-22. doi:10.1007/s00256-002-0616-7 - Pubmed
- 2. Milgram J. Intraosseous Lipomas: Radiologic and Pathologic Manifestations. Radiology. 1988;167(1):155-60. doi:10.1148/radiology.167.1.3347718 - Pubmed
- 3. Chung C, Murphey M, Cho G et al. Osseous Lesions of the Pelvis and Long Tubular Bones Containing Both Fat and Fluid-Like Signal Intensity: An Analysis of 28 Patients. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(1):103-9. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.02.008 - Pubmed
- 4. Eyzaguirre E, Liqiang W, Karla G, Rajendra K, Alberto A, Gatalica Z. Intraosseous Lipoma. A Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Study of 5 Cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11(5):320-5. doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2006.09.006 - Pubmed
- 5. Chow L & Lee K. Intraosseous Lipoma. A Clinicopathologic Study of Nine Cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(4):401-10. - Pubmed
- 6. Murphey M, Carroll J, Flemming D, Pope T, Gannon F, Kransdorf M. From the Archives of the AFIP: Benign Musculoskeletal Lipomatous Lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433-66. doi:10.1148/rg.245045120 - Pubmed
- 7. A. Mark Davies, Murali Sundaram, Steven J. James. Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. (2009) ISBN: 9783540779827 - Google Books
- 8. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, Who Classification of Tumours Editorial. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. (2020) ISBN: 9789283245025 - Google Books