Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Behrang Amini had no recorded disclosures.View Behrang Amini's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Mohammad Taghi Niknejad had no financial relationships to ineligible companies to disclose.View Mohammad Taghi Niknejad's current disclosures
Intussusception occurs when one segment of the bowel is pulled into itself or a neighboring loop of the bowel by peristalsis. It is an important cause of an acute abdomen in children and merits timely ultrasound examination and reduction to preclude significant sequelae, including bowel necrosis. When occurring in the adult population, intussusception is usually caused by a focal lesion acting as a lead point.
The vast majority of intussusceptions (95%) occur in children, usually after the first three months of life 13.
While the classic triad of intermittent abdominal pain, vomiting, and right upper quadrant mass, plus occult or gross blood on rectal examination, has great positive predictive value for intussusception in children 1, these findings, taken together, are seen in less than 20% of intussusception cases 2. Approximately 15% (range 13-22%) of patients with intussusception do not even present with abdominal pain 3,4. Classic physical exam findings include an oblong palpable mass in the right upper quadrant described as "sausage-like" with a paucity of palpable bowel in the right lower quadrant 17. Sometimes the parents will report the passing of red stool ("currant jelly" stool) which is stool mixed with blood and mucus and is a sign that bowel ischemia has occurred.
A proximal part of the bowel is pulled into the distal lumen and propulsed forwards as if it were a bolus of food. The prolapsing part of the bowel is described as the intussusceptum, while the distal segment of bowel receiving the intussusceptum is described as the intussuscipiens. As the mesentery is incorporated into the intussusception, venous return is compromised, resulting in edema and further restriction of blood flow. Eventually, arterial supply to the bowel is interrupted, and ischemia and necrosis ensue.
In children, a lead point is not identified in 90% of cases, and this is most frequently thought to relate to hypertrophic lymphoid tissue following an infection. This potentially explains the relative rarity of the condition in the first three months of life, when passive immunity is still paramount.
In infants and adults, a lead point is more frequently identified, with up to 90% of adult cases having a lead point (which is usually malignant in the large bowel and benign in the small bowel 13).
Lead points are numerous and include 9,11,13:
gastrointestinal malignancy (most common cause in adults, accounting for 65% of cases 13)
Intussusception can occur essentially anywhere. In adults, no pattern of distribution is present as such as in the vast majority of cases a lead point lesion is present, and thus the location will depend on the location of that lesion. In children there is a strong predilection for the ileocolic region:
ileocolic: most common (75-95%), presumably due to the abundance of lymphoid tissue related to the terminal ileum and the anatomy of the ileocecal region
ileoileocolic: second most common
ileoileal and colocolic: uncommon
gastric intussusception: rare, but documented 13
Abdominal radiographs may demonstrate an elongated soft tissue mass (typically in the upper right quadrant in children) with bowel obstruction (and therefore air-fluid levels and bowel dilation) proximal to it. There may be an absence of gas in the distal collapsed bowel.
Perforation may also be identified, and more apparent on cross-table lateral view.
A contrast enema remains the gold standard, demonstrating the intussusception as an occluding mass prolapsing into the lumen, giving the "coiled spring” appearance (barium in the lumen of the intussusceptum and in the intraluminal space). The main absolute contraindication for an enema is perforation, which needs to be treated surgically.
Ultrasonography has a false-negative rate approaching zero and is a reliable screening tool for children at low risk for intussusception 5-9. Children with classic findings of intussusception, however, need to be investigated with an enema, which is both diagnostic (the gold standard in the diagnosis of intussusception) and therapeutic.
Ultrasound signs include:
target sign (also known as the doughnut sign)
absent blood flow in the intussusceptum (a contraindication to enema reduction)
free fluid within the intusussceptum
a lead point within the intussusceptum mass eg a lymph node
Features that favor ileocolic over small bowel intussusception 14:
presence of a hyperechoic core, representing mesenteric fat
diameter of the fatty core exceeding that of the outer wall
larger anteroposterior diameter (mean 2.6 cm vs. 1.4 cm)
diameter over 2 cm strongly argues in favor of ileocolic
thicker outer hypoechoic wall (mean 0.6 cm vs 0.4 cm)
lymph nodes inside the intussusception
greater length of intussusceptum (>3 cm strongly favoring ileocolic)
average length of ileocolic 53.4 mm, compared with small bowel intussuception, with an average length of 27.6 mm 19
absence of a normal sonographic appearance to the ileocecal junction and ascending colon
Small bowel intussusception has a predilection for the paraumbilical to left upper/lower quadrants of the abdomen 16. While typically transient, surgical management may be required if spontaneous reduction is unlikely to occur. Sonographic features which are considered more consistent with an uncomplicated clinical course include:
outer diameter <2.5 cm 15
preserved bowel wall motility
no identifiable lead point
invagination length <3 cm
CT has become the modality of choice for assessment of acute abdomen in adults, and thus most frequently images intussusception. Also, short length transient intussusception is a frequent incidental finding.
The appearance of intussusception on CT is characteristic and depends on the imaging plane and where along the bowel the images are obtained.
Best known is the so-called bowel-within-bowel configuration, in which the layers of the bowel are duplicated forming concentric rings (CT equivalent of the ultrasonographic target sign) when imaged at right angles to the lumen, and a soft tissue sausage when imaged longitudinally 13.
At the proximal end of the intussusception, there will be two concentric enhancing/hyperdense rings, formed by the inner bowel and the folded edge of the outer bowel. As one images further along the intussusception the mesentery (fat and vessels) will form a crescent of tissue around the compressed innermost lumen, surrounded by the two layers of the outer enveloping bowel. Even further distally the lead point (if present) will be visualized 13.
Treatment and prognosis
In children, intussusception reduction can be achieved without recourse to surgery in most cases. Using a water-soluble medium or air introduced via a rectal catheter, retrograde pressure can be exerted to reduce the intussusception. If symptoms have been protracted, rectal blood is present; there are signs of peritonitis or enema reduction is unsuccessful then surgical intervention is usually required. With no surgical treatment, there can be recurrence rates of up to 30%.
In adults, a laparotomy is usually required, especially as in most cases a lead point requiring treatment is present.
On imaging the appearances on ultrasound and CT are characteristic. The main differential is that of transient intussusception, which is an incidental finding requiring no treatment or follow-up.
Other conditions to be considered in adults include:
- 1. Harrington L, Connolly B, Hu X, Wesson D, Babyn P, Schuh S. Ultrasonographic and Clinical Predictors of Intussusception. J Pediatr. 1998;132(5):836-9. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70314-2
- 2. Ein S, Stephens C, Minor A. The Painless Intussusception. J Pediatr Surg. 1976;11(4):563-4. doi:10.1016/s0022-3468(76)80013-9
- 3. Kuppermann N, O'Dea T, Pinckney L, Hoecker C. Predictors of Intussusception in Young Children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(3):250. doi:10.1001/archpedi.154.3.250
- 4. Swischuk L, Hayden C, Boulden T. Intussusception: Indications for Ultrasonography and an Explanation of the Doughnut and Pseudokidney Signs. Pediatr Radiol. 1985;15(6):388-91. doi:10.1007/bf02388356
- 5. Lee H, Yeh H, Leu Y. Intussusception: The Sonographic Diagnosis and Its Clinical Value. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;8(3):343-7. PMID 2651636
- 6. Friedman A, Haller J, Schneider M, Schussheim A. The Pediatric Corner. Sonographic Appearance of Intussusception in Children. Am J Gastroenterol. 1979;72(1):92-4. PMID 463856
- 7. Bhisitkul D, Listernick R, Shkolnik A et al. Clinical Application of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Intussusception. J Pediatr. 1992;121(2):182-6. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81185-0
- 8. Pracros J, Tran-Minh V, Morin de Finfe C, Deffrenne-Pracros P, Louis D, Basset T. Acute Intestinal Intussusception in Children. Contribution of Ultrasonography (145 Cases). Ann Radiol (Paris). 1987;30(7):525-30. PMID 3326510
- 9. Sparnon A, Little K, Morris L. Intussusception in Childhood: A Review of 139 Cases. Aust N Z J Surg. 2008;54(4):353-6. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1984.tb05332.x
- 10. Anderson D. The Pseudokidney Sign. Radiology. 1999;211(2):395-7. doi:10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ma21395
- 11. del-Pozo G, Albillos J, Tejedor D. Intussusception: US Findings with Pathologic Correlation--The Crescent-In-Doughnut Sign. Radiology. 1996;199(3):688-92. doi:10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637988
- 12. Kim Y, Blake M, Harisinghani M et al. Adult Intestinal Intussusception: CT Appearances and Identification of a Causative Lead Point. Radiographics. 2006;26(3):733-44. doi:10.1148/rg.263055100
- 13. Choi S, Han J, Kim S et al. Intussusception in Adults: From Stomach to Rectum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(3):691-8. doi:10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830691
- 14. Lioubashevsky N, Hiller N, Rozovsky K, Segev L, Simanovsky N. Ileocolic Versus Small-Bowel Intussusception in Children: Can US Enable Reliable Differentiation? Radiology. 2013;269(1):266-71. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122639
- 15. Kim J. US Features of Transient Small Bowel Intussusception in Pediatric Patients. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5(3):178. doi:10.3348/kjr.2004.5.3.178
- 16. Tiao M, Wan Y, Ng S et al. Sonographic Features of Small-Bowel Intussusception in Pediatric Patients. Acad Emergency Med. 2001;8(4):368-73. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb02115.x
- 17. Lin-Martore M, Kornblith A, Kohn M, Gottlieb M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound for Intussusception in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. WestJEM. 2020;21(4). doi:10.5811/westjem.2020.4.46241
- 18. Al-Momani H. Waugh Syndrome: A Report of 7 Patients and Review of the Published Reports. Ann Saudi Med. 2014;34(6):527-31. doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2014.527 [Pubmed]
- 19. Zhang M, Zhou X, Hu Q, Jin L. Accurately Distinguishing Pediatric Ileocolic Intussusception from Small-Bowel Intussusception Using Ultrasonography. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(4):721-6. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.014 - Pubmed