Mammary duct ectasia
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Manchikanti Venkatesh had no recorded disclosures.View Manchikanti Venkatesh's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Henry Knipe had the following disclosures:
- Integral Diagnostics, Shareholder (ongoing)
- Micro-X Ltd, Shareholder (ongoing)
These were assessed during peer review and were determined to not be relevant to the changes that were made.View Henry Knipe's current disclosures
Mammary duct ectasia is the abnormal widening of one or more breast ducts to greater than 2 mm diameter, or 3 mm at the ampulla. It can be due to benign or malignant processes.
It is more common in females in an age group of 50-60 years (i.e. postmenopausal). It is very rarely seen in males. It can occasionally be seen in children 14.
Ductal ectasia is often asymptomatic, especially when benign. However, patients with ductal ectasia may present with nonspecific breast symptoms:
Benign duct ectasia is characterized by chronic inflammatory and fibrotic changes. Inspissation of debris and secretions within the dilated ducts and later calcification of these ductal contents occurs. There is a known association between ductal ectasia and smoking 12.
Intraductal malignancy can also cause duct ectasia.
dilated linear branching densities in subareolar region
variably present rod-like calcifications pointing towards the nipple
distended branching or tubular structures with anechoic contents measuring more than 2 mm diameter
On T1 and T2 weighted images it appears as dilated increased signal intensity branching ducts converging towards the nipple without an overlying mass. Hyperintense signals are due to thick proteinaceous fluid or blood.
History and etymology
It was first described by Haagensen in the year 1951 3.
Treatment and prognosis
Most treatments are aimed at symptom relief and excluding more malicious pathologies. If there is a mastitis element, antibiotics may be considered.
For dilated ducts see: differential diagnosis of dilated ducts on breast imaging.
Bilateral, subareolar findings of duct ectasia may confidently be assessed as benign (BI-RADS 1 or 2).
A unilateral (asymmetric) mammographic finding of duct ectasia without demonstrated stability on prior studies warrants further evaluation with ultrasound 15. Features that on ultrasound should raise suspicion for malignancy include nonsubareolar location, hypoechoic intraluminal contents, ductal wall irregularity or indistinctness, or solid parenchymal mass 9,15.
A solitary dilated duct, a rare type of asymmetric duct ectasia, is suspicious for malignancy and biopsy should be considered (BI-RADS 4) 15.
- 1. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure M, Gerson D, Poppiti R, Esserman L. Common and Unusual Diseases of the Nipple-Areolar Complex. Radiographics. 2007;27 Suppl 1(suppl_1):S65-77. doi:10.1148/rg.27si075512 - Pubmed
- 2. Dickerson E, Budway R, Surampudi R, Tabor E. Mammary Duct Ectasia in a Man with Liver Disease, End Stage Renal Failure, and Adjacent Arteriovenous Fistula. J Radiol Case Rep. 2010;4(8):36-41. doi:10.3941/jrcr.v4i8.485 - Pubmed
- 3. Ashworth M, Corcoran G, Haqqani M. Periductal Mastitis and Mammary Duct Ectasia in a Male. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61(717):621-3. doi:10.1136/pgmj.61.717.621 - Pubmed
- 4. Gokhale S. Ultrasound Characterization of Breast Masses. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(3):242-7. doi:10.4103/0971-3026.54878 - Pubmed
- 5. Browning J, Bigrigg A, Taylor I. Symptomatic and Incidental Mammary Duct Ectasia. J R Soc Med. 1986;79(12):715-6. doi:10.1177/014107688607901210 - Pubmed
- 6. Thomas W, Williamson R, Davies J, Webb A. The Clinical Syndrome of Mammary Duct Ectasia. Br J Surg. 1982;69(7):423-5. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800690724 - Pubmed
- 7. Dixon J. Periductal Mastitis/Duct Ectasia. World J Surg. 1989;13(6):715-20. doi:10.1007/BF01658420 - Pubmed
- 8. Dixon J, Ravisekar O, Chetty U, Anderson T. Periductal Mastitis and Duct Ectasia: Different Conditions with Different Aetiologies. Br J Surg. 1996;83(6):820-2. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800830630 - Pubmed
- 9. Ferris-James D, Iuanow E, Mehta T, Shaheen R, Slanetz P. Imaging Approaches to Diagnosis and Management of Common Ductal Abnormalities. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1009-30. doi:10.1148/rg.324115150 - Pubmed
- 10. Wolfgang Dähnert. Radiology Review Manual. (2011) ISBN: 9781609139438 - Google Books
- 11. Jacob Mandell. Core Radiology. (2013) ISBN: 9781107679689 - Google Books
- 12. Rahal R, de Freitas-Júnior R, Paulinelli R. Risk Factors for Duct Ectasia. Breast J. 2005;11(4):262-5. doi:10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21684.x - Pubmed
- 13. Cong Y, Zou H, Qiao G et al. Bilateral Mammary Duct Ectasia Induced by Sulpiride-Associated Hyperprolactinemia: A Case Report. Oncol Lett. 2015;9(5):2181-4. doi:10.3892/ol.2015.3034 - Pubmed
- 14. Jung Y & Chung J. Mammary Duct Ectasia with Bloody Nipple Discharge in a Child. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86(3):165-7. doi:10.4174/astr.2014.86.3.165 - Pubmed
- 15. Lee S, Sobel L, Shamis M, Mahoney M. Asymmetric Ductal Ectasia: An Often Overlooked Sign of Malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213(2):473-81. doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20651 - Pubmed