Mammary duct ectasia
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Manchikanti Venkatesh had no recorded disclosures.View Manchikanti Venkatesh's current disclosures
Mammary duct ectasia is the abnormal widening of one or more breast ducts to greater than 2 mm diameter, or 3 mm at the ampulla. It can be due to benign or malignant processes.
It is more common in females in an age group of 50-60 years (i.e. postmenopausal). It is very rarely seen in males. It can occasionally be seen in children 14.
Ductal ectasia is often asymptomatic, especially when benign. However, patients with ductal ectasia may present with nonspecific breast symptoms:
- nipple discharge
- nipple retraction
- palpable mass
Benign duct ectasia is characterized by chronic inflammatory and fibrotic changes. Inspissation of debris and secretions within the dilated ducts and later calcification of these ductal contents occurs. There is a known association between ductal ectasia and smoking 12.
Intraductal malignancy can also cause duct ectasia.
- dilated linear branching densities in subareolar region
- variably present rod-like calcifications pointing towards the nipple
- distended branching or tubular structures with anechoic contents measuring more than 2 mm diameter
On T1 and T2 weighted images it appears as dilated increased signal intensity branching ducts converging towards the nipple without an overlying mass. Hyperintense signals are due to thick proteinaceous fluid or blood.
History and etymology
It was first described by Haagensen in the year 1951 3.
Treatment and prognosis
Most treatments are aimed at symptom relief and excluding more malicious pathologies. If there is a mastitis element, antibiotics may be considered.
For dilated ducts see: differential diagnosis of dilated ducts on breast imaging.
Bilateral, subareolar findings of duct ectasia may confidently be assessed as benign (BI-RADS 1 or 2).
A unilateral (asymmetric) mammographic finding of duct ectasia without demonstrated stability on prior studies warrants further evaluation with ultrasound 15. Features that on ultrasound should raise suspicion for malignancy include nonsubareolar location, hypoechoic intraluminal contents, ductal wall irregularity or indistinctness, or solid parenchymal mass 9,15.
A solitary dilated duct, a rare type of asymmetric duct ectasia, is suspicious for malignancy and biopsy should be considered (BI-RADS 4) 15.
- 1. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML et-al. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27 Suppl 1 (suppl_1): S65-77. doi:10.1148/rg.27si075512 - Pubmed citation
- 2. Dickerson E, Budway R, Surampudi R et-al. Mammary duct ectasia in a man with liver disease, end stage renal failure, and adjacent arteriovenous fistula. J Radiol Case Rep. 2010;4 (8): 36-41. doi:10.3941/jrcr.v4i8.485 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 3. Ashworth MT, Corcoran GD, Haqqani MT. Periductal mastitis and mammary duct ectasia in a male. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 (717): 621-3. Postgrad Med J (abstract) - doi:10.1136/pgmj.61.717.621 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 4. Gokhale S. Ultrasound characterization of breast masses. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19 (3): 242-7. doi:10.4103/0971-3026.54878 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 5. Browning J, Bigrigg A, Taylor I. Symptomatic and incidental mammary duct ectasia. J R Soc Med. 1987;79 (12): 715-6. Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 6. Thomas WG, Williamson RC, Davies JD et-al. The clinical syndrome of mammary duct ectasia. Br J Surg. 1982;69 (7): 423-5. Pubmed citation
- 7. Dixon JM. Periductal mastitis/duct ectasia. World J Surg. 1990;13 (6): 715-20. Pubmed citation
- 8. Dixon JM, Ravisekar O, Chetty U et-al. Periductal mastitis and duct ectasia: different conditions with different aetiologies. Br J Surg. 1996;83 (6): 820-2. Pubmed citation
- 9. Ferris-James DM, Iuanow E, Mehta TS, Shaheen RM, Slanetz PJ. Imaging approaches to diagnosis and management of common ductal abnormalities. (2012) Radiographics. 32 (4): 1009-30. doi:10.1148/rg.324115150 - Pubmed
- 10. Dähnert W. Radiology Review Manual. LWW. (2011) ISBN:1609139437. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 11. Mandell J. Core Radiology. Cambridge University Press. (2013) ISBN:1107679680. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 12. Rahal RM, de Freitas-Júnior R, Paulinelli RR. Risk factors for duct ectasia. Breast J. 2005;11 (4): 262-5. doi:10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21684.x - Pubmed citation
- 13. Cong Y, Zou H, Qiao G, Lin J, Wang X, Li X, Li Y, Zhu S. Bilateral mammary duct ectasia induced by sulpiride-associated hyperprolactinemia: A case report. (2015) Oncology letters. 9 (5): 2181-2184. doi:10.3892/ol.2015.3034 - Pubmed
- 14. Jung Y, Chung JH. Mammary duct ectasia with bloody nipple discharge in a child. (2014) Annals of surgical treatment and research. 86 (3): 165-7. doi:10.4174/astr.2014.86.3.165 - Pubmed
- 15. Lee SJ, Sobel LD, Shamis M, Mahoney MC. Asymmetric Ductal Ectasia: An Often Overlooked Sign of Malignancy. (2019) AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 213 (2): 473-481. doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20651 - Pubmed