Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Frank Gaillard had no recorded disclosures.View Frank Gaillard's current disclosures
Mammography is a dedicated radiographic technique for imaging the breast, and the resultant images are known as mammograms.
Types of mammography
In general terms, there are two types of mammography: screening and diagnostic.
Mammography differs significantly in many respects from the rest of diagnostic imaging.
In general terms, screening mammography is performed on asymptomatic women to identify malignant breast pathology at an early, potentially curable stage. Regardless of confusing statistics in lay publications, the earlier breast cancer is picked up, all other factors being equal, the better the survival rate. Screening mammography is performed on clients, not patients.
Imaging performed on symptomatic patients, or to work-up an abnormality found on screening mammography. The objective is to use imaging to typify pathology and arrive at a diagnosis. This is important because different diagnoses have significantly different outcomes and survival rates. For instance, a diagnosis of a simple breast cyst has few implications and does not affect the patient's life expectancy. In contrast, a diagnosis of breast cancer has significant implications for the patient and their life expectancy.
Differences between the screening and diagnostic environments
Screening studies are well performed by trained sympathetic staff in environments that are not necessarily located in hospitals. Screening centers function very well as stand-alone locations without a physician on-site. The studies are usually read by breast radiologists and/or breast physicians in an isolated environment. In contrast to the rest of radiology, these studies are read in batches (boards) and in large volumes, and comparison to prior mammograms is vital. Where screening studies are read in environments where interruptions, phones and distractions are present, the risk of mistakes occurring is higher. In many countries, breast cancer screening programs require screening mammograms to be double-read (i.e. two independent breast imagers read the mammogram) with any discordance being referred to a third independent reader. The standard screening views performed are the craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections of each breast.
Diagnostic studies are performed with a radiologist on-site, involved with every step of the imaging procedure. Standard views are supplemented with additional views (e.g. coned views, cleavage view, compression view, lateral view, mediolateral view) to further assess the screening-detected abnormality.
Why is a diagnosis of breast cancer significant?
The diagnosis of breast cancer is significant for many obvious and perhaps less obvious reasons. The diagnosis not only affects the patient, but affects those around her e.g. her female relatives. The disease has a sinister reputation because of the debilitating cosmetic results traditionally associated with surgery and the invariably bad outcome for the patient traditionally associated with the disease.
Why is mammography important?
Until a cure for the disease is found, mammography is the best tool we have to find breast cancers early i.e. before they are palpable. The result of this is a potential cure for the patient and cosmetically-acceptable surgery if required. In general terms, the earlier a cancer is found, the better the outcome. We luckily no longer live in a world of Halsted mastectomies.
Why does a breast imager read mammograms?
For some strange reason, not all radiologists are "wired" to read breast imaging. The reason for this is unclear. This has nothing to do with capability, intelligence or competency in other fields of imaging. Mammogram readers must have statistically proven, reproducible proficiency to allow them to qualify to read the images and to objectively and independently confirm their proficiency. This is important because of the emotive and potentially disturbing consequences of a significant finding on a mammogram. Unnecessary recalls cost money, do not add value and upset the patient and her physician.
Why all the adverse publicity for mammography?
It has become politically correct to question the value of mammography. Most of the adverse publicity has a single source out of The Cochrane Collaboration and from one author. The emotion around the disease and its appeal in the lay literature then fuels the publicity which detracts from the scientifically proven value of early diagnosis, improved survival and cosmetically acceptable treatment. A review of the ongoing debate in this regard is out of the scope of this website. Suffice to say that in many respects this is an unfortunate debate driven by people who are not breast imagers and it detracts time, money, effort and attention from the real issue - finding a cure. This debate has many features in common with the infamous debate surrounding autism and MMR vaccination.
Criteria for image quality assessment
- all breast glandular tissue imaged
- patient ID (name and URN or DOB)
- side markers
- radiographer ID
- cassette ID (ideally)
- correct exposure - can "bright light" skin and nipple
- no movement artifact
- no skin folds
- symmetrical images
Adequate craniocaudal (CC) views
- all glandular tissue identified
- nipple in profile
- nipple in the midline of image
- length of posterior nipple line (PNL) within 1 cm in size (cf. PNL on MLO)
- images symmetric
Adequate mediolateral oblique (MLO) views
- 1. Emily F. Conant, Cecilia M. Brennecke. Breast Imaging: Case Review Series (Case Review). (2006) ISBN: 0323017460