Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
Citation:
Gaillard F, Knipe H, Botz B, et al. Marshall classification of traumatic brain injury. Reference article, Radiopaedia.org (Accessed on 10 Oct 2024) https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-46288
Disclosures:
At the time the article was last revised Henry Knipe had the following disclosures:
- Micro-X Ltd, Shareholder (past)
These were assessed during peer review and were determined to
not be relevant to the changes that were made.
View Henry Knipe's current disclosures
The Marshall classification of traumatic brain injury is a CT scan-derived metric using only a few features and has been shown to predict outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Usage
This system was first published in 1992 1, building on findings from a large cohort of head injury cases described in 1990 2, and is in common use (c. 2024 7) for grading acute TBI based on CT findings.
The Rotterdam score is a more recent system that attempts to address some of the recognized limitations of the Marshall system, such as the struggle to classify patients with multiple types of injuries 3-5. It has been suggested that although both systems are valuable in predicting an outcome, as the newer Rotterdam score incorporates additional variables (e.g. subarachnoid hemorrhage) and may be a preferable measure 6.
Classification
The Marshall system places patients into one of six categories (I to VI) of increasing severity based on findings on non-contrast CT scans of the brain. Higher categories have worse prognosis and survival. It is primarily concerned with two features:
-
degree of swelling, as determined by
presence and size of contusions/hemorrhages referred to "high or mixed density lesions"
Categories
-
diffuse injury I (no visible pathology)
-
diffuse injury II
midline shift of 0 to 5 mm
basal cisterns remain visible
no high or mixed density lesions >25 cm3
-
diffuse injury III (swelling)
midline shift of 0 to 5 mm
basal cisterns compressed or completely effaced
no high or mixed density lesions >25 cm3
-
diffuse injury IV (shift)
-
evacuated mass lesion V
-
non-evacuated mass lesion VI
-
1. Marshall L, Marshall S, Klauber M et al. The Diagnosis of Head Injury Requires a Classification Based on Computed Axial Tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9 Suppl 1:S287-92. - Pubmed
-
2. Eisenberg H, Gary H, Aldrich E et al. Initial CT Findings in 753 Patients with Severe Head Injury. A Report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg. 1990;73(5):688-98. doi:10.3171/jns.1990.73.5.0688 - Pubmed
-
3. Saatman K, Duhaime A, Bullock R et al. Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury for Targeted Therapies. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25(7):719-38. doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0586 - Pubmed
-
4. Munakomi S, Bhattarai B, Srinivas B, Cherian I. Role of Computed Tomography Scores and Findings to Predict Early Death in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Reappraisal in a Major Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal. Surg Neurol Int. 2016;7(1):23. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.177125 - Pubmed
-
5. Mata-Mbemba D, Mugikura S, Nakagawa A et al. Early CT Findings to Predict Early Death in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Marshall and Rotterdam CT Scoring Systems Compared in the Major Academic Tertiary Care Hospital in Northeastern Japan. Acad Radiol. 2014;21(5):605-11. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.017 - Pubmed
-
6. Deepika A, Prabhuraj A, Saikia A, Shukla D. Comparison of Predictability of Marshall and Rotterdam CT Scan Scoring System in Determining Early Mortality After Traumatic Brain Injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(11):2033-8. doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2575-5 - Pubmed
-
7. Obasa A, Olopade F, Juliano S, Olopade J. Traumatic Brain Injury or Traumatic Brain Disease: A Scientific Commentary. Brain Multiphysics. 2024;6:100092. doi:10.1016/j.brain.2024.100092
Promoted articles (advertising)