Maternal hydronephrosis in pregnancy
Citation, DOI & article data
Maternal hydronephrosis in pregnancy often results as a physiological phenomenon due to the presence of the fetus.
It is estimated that up to 90% of women have some degree of asymptomatic dilatation of the renal calyces, the renal pelves and the upper two-thirds of the ureters during pregnancy 3. It is thought to be most pronounced in primigravid females.
As the fetus grows, the dilatation usually develops during the second trimester. Mechanical compression of the ureter between the gravid uterus and iliopsoas muscle is generally thought to be the mechanism 5,6,8.
Very rarely other entities such as urinary tract calculi can complicate the picture. The prevalence of ureteric calculi in pregnancy is low and is estimated around 0.03-0.4% depending on the population.
There may be an association between gestational hydronephrosis and increased frequency of ascending urinary tract infection.
The dilatation is often more prominent on the right side.
Will show renal pelvic and proximal dilatation. In order to differentiate pure physiological hydronephrosis from a worsening of an existing hydronephrosis due to an underlying pathology (e.g. urinary tract calculus), some authorities have devised charts showing the upper limit of normals allowable for gestation.
Treatment and prognosis
In most cases, it disappears within a few weeks after birth. The vast majority of asymptomatic cases are treated conservatively 1 especially since most cases of physiological calyectasis do not impair renal function. Ureteral catheters may be introduced in selected symptomatic cases. If however the kidney is obstructed with superimposed infection, prompt surgical decompression is warranted in addition to antibiotic therapy.
- 1. Fainaru O, Almog B, Gamzu R et-al. The management of symptomatic hydronephrosis in pregnancy. BJOG. 2002;109 (12): 1385-7. BJOG (link) - Pubmed citation
- 2. Puskar D, Balagović I, Filipović A et-al. Symptomatic physiologic hydronephrosis in pregnancy: incidence, complications and treatment. Eur. Urol. 2001;39 (3): 260-3. - Pubmed citation
- 3. Ferguson T, Bechtel W. Hydronephrosis of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 1991;43 (6): 2135-7. - Pubmed citation
- 4. Rasmussen PE, Nielsen FR. Hydronephrosis during pregnancy: a literature survey. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1988;27 (3): 249-59. - Pubmed citation
- 5. Au KK, Woo JS, Tang LC et-al. Aetiological factors in the genesis of pregnancy hydronephrosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;25 (4): 248-51. - Pubmed citation
- 6. Woo JS, Wan CW, Ma HK. Pregnancy hydronephrosis--a longitudinal ultrasonic evaluation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;24 (1): 9-13. - Pubmed citation
- 7. Fradin JM, Regan F, Rodriquez R et-al. Hydronephrosis in pregnancy: simultaneous depiction of fetal and maternal hydronephrosis by magnetic resonance urography. Urology. 1999;53 (4): 825-7. Urology (link) - Pubmed citation
- 8. Leyendecker JR, Gorengaut V, Brown JJ. MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Radiographics. 24 (5): 1301-16. doi:10.1148/rg.245045036 - Pubmed citation