Mucinous carcinoma of the breast
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created The Radswiki had no recorded disclosures.View The Radswiki's current disclosures
Mucinous carcinoma of the breast, also known as colloid breast carcinoma, is a subtype of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). They account for about ~2% (range 1-7% 4) of breast cancers.
It tends to occur in older women where a prevalence of as much as 7% is found among women 75 years or older, whereas the prevalence is only 1% in women younger than 35 years 4.
If palpable, they tend to manifest as soft masses.
At pathological examination, the dominant feature is the presence of mucin within and surrounding cancer cells. The mucin to cell ratio can vary from lesion to lesion.
A core biopsy specimen usually gives a gelatinous appearance.
Microscopically, it is formed by large mucin lakes surrounded by mucus-producing cancer cells.
Histologically it is divided into two broad types:
hypocellular type A or pure mucinous breast cancer:
the entire tumor consists of well-differentiated carcinoma cells with excessive extracellular mucin surrounding them
the growth pattern is often expanding, cellularity and mitotic activity are low, and cell atypia is not very prominent
the margin of the tumor is usually well demarcated
hypercellular type B or mixed mucinous breast cancer:
the tumor also contains variable areas of invasive carcinoma of no special type
they are devoid of extracellular mucin
this type is more likely to be infiltrative and carries a much worse prognosis.
The majority of well-marginated breast masses are benign but 10-20% of breast malignancies also could be well-circumscribed such as mucinous tumors; others include papillary, medullary, and metaplastic carcinomas as well as malignant phyllodes tumors. Because of the different patterns of mammogram and ultrasound, both should be performed in all cases of mucinous carcinoma of the breast and in some equivocal cases breast MRI is of great value.
The presence of mucin results in a low-density and relatively well-defined lobular mass. Sometimes they may have partly faded or obscure margins. Up to 20% of lesions can be occult on mammography 4. Calcification can be rare in pure mucinous types.
On ultrasound, mucinous carcinomas often display mixed echogenicity with mixed solid and cystic components. Posterior acoustic enhancement is common. At times the lesion can be isoechoic to breast tissue which can make diagnosis difficult 3.
Distal enhancement and microlobulated margins are also commonly found in mucinous carcinomas. Homogeneity on sonography is associated with the pure type of mucinous carcinoma of the breast, in which margins are usually well defined, and the tumor is isoechoic relative to the fat surrounding the breast tissue on ultrasound. A mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast tends to be more hypoechoic.
On MRI, they are one of the few cancers that have very high signal intensity on T2-weighted images 2 which relates to the water component in mucin. When compared with other malignant breast tumors, they show lower signal intensity on DWI and increased ADC values. On post-contrast images, benign-appearing kinetics with gradual and persistent enhancement is typical and they can be easily mistaken for benign lesions.
PET-CT may help to differentiate pure from mixed mucinous carcinoma and to evaluate the aggressiveness of the tumor.
Treatment and prognosis
A pure mucinous subtype carries a relatively good prognosis compared to other adenocarcinomas: 5-year survival 95% (stage 2), 75% (stage 3), 35% (stage 4). Overall the tendency to metastasize is less than for other types of cancer (e.g. invasive carcinoma of no special type). The mixed mucinous subtype has a more aggressive behavior.
- 1. Harvey J. Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis. Radiology. 2007;242(3):683-94. doi:10.1148/radiol.2423051631 - Pubmed
- 2. Santamaría G, Velasco M, Bargalló X, Caparrós X, Farrús B, Luis Fernández P. Radiologic and Pathologic Findings in Breast Tumors with High Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images. Radiographics. 2010;30(2):533-48. doi:10.1148/rg.302095044 - Pubmed
- 3. Emily F. Conant, Cecilia M. Brennecke. Breast Imaging. (2006) ISBN: 9780323017466 - Google Books
- 4. Lam W, Chu W, Tse G, Ma T. Sonographic Appearance of Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(4):1069-74. doi:10.2214/ajr.182.4.1821069 - Pubmed
- 5. Chopra S, Evans A, Pinder S et al. Pure Mucinous Breast Cancer-Mammographic and Ultrasound Findings. Clin Radiol. 1996;51(6):421-4. doi:10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80162-0 - Pubmed
- 6. Memis A, Ozdemir N, Parildar M, Ustun E, Erhan Y. Mucinous (Colloid) Breast Cancer: Mammographic and US Features with Histologic Correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35(1):39-43. doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(99)00124-2 - Pubmed
- 7. Gilda Cardenosa. Clinical Breast Imaging. (2006) ISBN: 9780781762670 - Google Books
- 8. Daniel B. Kopans. Breast Imaging. (2007) ISBN: 9780781747684 - Google Books
- 9. StatBite: Breast Cancer: 5-Year Survival Rates in U.S. For Selected Histologic Types by Stage. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(19):1303. doi:10.1093/jnci/djp338 - Pubmed
- 10. Bitencourt A, Graziano L, Osório C et al. MRI Features of Mucinous Cancer of the Breast: Correlation With Pathologic Findings and Other Imaging Methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(2):238-46. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14851 - Pubmed