Pediatric abdomen (prone cross-table lateral view)
Citation, DOI & article data
The prone cross-table lateral view is an additional projection to demonstrate the pediatric abdomen and is a more ideal alternative to the invertogram, which may be less comfortable for the patient. This discomfort may result in a continuously crying baby, causing the puborectalis sling to contract, leading to a misleading impression of distal rectal obscuration 1,2.
This view is ideal for indicating the distance between the gas bubble in the terminal colon and the perineal skin, allowing the classification of anal atresia in neonates. The image is often obtained 24 hours after birth, to allow for small fistulas to become apparent.
- patient is prone in genupectoral position (for a minimum of 3 minutes)
- ensure no rotation of hips and shoulders
- remove any radiopaque items (e.g. ECG dots, diaper, shiny decorative clothing)
- take the x-ray in full inspiration
- a radiopaque marker (i.e. a coin) is placed over the expected anus using radiolucent tape
- lateral projection
- suspended inspiration (on observation)
- the midcoronal plane at the level of the greater trochanter 1
- superior to the diaphragm
- inferior to the rectum
- anteroposterior to include soft tissue edge
- will vary depending on the child's body habitus
- 60-75 kVp
- 3-10 mAs
- 100 cm
- if patient thickness is above 10 cm, use of a grid is advisable 3
Image technical evaluation
- it should be possible to determine the distance between the air-filled distal rectal pouch and the anal dimple (marked by a radio-opaque marker)
- the abdomen should be free from rotation
- no blurring of the bowel gas from respiratory motion is ideal
Contact lead shielding is no longer recommended for any pediatric examination. Statements have been released by several radiological societies supporting an end to this practice 4-7, with the most comprehensive guidance statement on this matter being in an 86-page joint report 8.
Please see your local department protocols for further clarification as they may differ from these recommendations.
Preparing the room beforehand (setting up the detector, exposure and preparing lead gowns) is extremely beneficial as patients may get startled by the movement of loud equipment.
Imaging of neonates whilst they are calm or asleep can allow for a less challenging examination.
To prevent malrotation and/or motion artefact in the radiograph, parental holding at the head and leg of the patient may be required. Placing immobilization devices to ensure the patient is faced down with their hips flexed will allow for increased stability in positioning.
- 1. Ajay Narayan Gangopadhyay, Vaibhav Pandey. Anorectal malformations. (2015) Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 20 (1): 10. doi:10.4103/0971-9261.145438 - Pubmed
- 2. Singh M, Mehra K. Imperforate Anus. [Updated 2019]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549784/ - eBook
- 3. A paediatric X‐ray exposure chart. (2014) Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 61 (3): 191. doi:10.1002/jmrs.56 - Pubmed
- 4. Statement No. 13 – NCRP Recommendations For Ending Routine Gonadal Shielding During Abdominal And Pelvic Radiography (2021)". Ncrponline.org, 2021. [Link].
- 5. ASMIRT Position Statement Gonad Shielding". Asmirt.org, 2021. [Link].
- 6. ASRT Statement on Fetal and Gonadal Shielding. Asrt.org, 2021. [Link].
- 7. Yogesh Thakur, Stephanie C. Schofield, Thorarin A. Bjarnason, Michael N. Patlas. Discontinuing Gonadal and Fetal Shielding in X-Ray:. (2021) Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. doi:10.1177/0846537121993092 doi:10.1177/0846537121993092.
- 8. Guidance on using shielding on patients for diagnostic radiology applications Joint report. Bir.org.uk, 2021. [Link].