Citation, DOI & article data
Patient data is a section in cases (visible in edit mode) where patient demographics can be entered. The two fields are:
Please round the patient age to the nearest 5 years for adult patients (i.e. ≥18 years). This is an additional privacy measure.
For pediatric patients, clearly, this would be inappropriate.
The format should include the units of time (usually "years"). For example:
- "18" or "19" becomes "20 years"
- "17 years" or younger remains unchanged
- "52" becomes "50 years"
- "3 months" (or weeks/days/hours) does not change
For obstetric imaging, there will be a maternal and gestational age.
- maternal age should be used in the patient demographic data
- gestational age should be included in the clinical details
No full stop/period should be included after the word "years":
- "20 years" not "20 years."
- equally, this applies to other units of time i.e. hours/days/weeks/months when used for infants' ages
Radiopaedia understands that gender is a social construct and patients may identify differently to their sex. As understanding of this topic has evolved, healthcare and research institutions have adapted the way they capture data to ensure that they have a true representation of their patients’ gender and sex, noting differences between them 1. Radiopaedia is not a research institution and will only capture "gender" in our cases.
The patient data section of our cases is to be treated as a representation of what would be written on a request; in most scenarios, the patient’s karyotype is not pertinent to the case. On the rare occasion it is (whereby the gender and sex do not match and is considered relevant to the clinical aspects of the case) then it can be included in the case data, clinical presentation or case discussion (as it would for any case in which the patients' karyotype is pertinent to the diagnosis).
Contributors have the choice of gender for all cases:
- other (with a free text option)
- 1. Janine Austin Clayton, Cara Tannenbaum. Reporting Sex, Gender, or Both in Clinical Research?. (2016) JAMA. 316 (18): 1863. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.16405