Renal cell carcinoma

Last revised by Joshua Yap on 23 Dec 2022

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) (historically also known as hypernephroma or Grawitz tumor) are primary malignant adenocarcinomas derived from the renal tubular epithelium and are the most common malignant renal tumor. They usually occur in 50-70-year old patients and macroscopic hematuria occurs in 60% of the cases. 

On imaging, they have a variety of radiographic appearances, from solid and relatively homogeneous to markedly heterogeneous with areas of necrosis, cystic change, and hemorrhage.

Patients are typically 50-70 years of age at presentation 1,2, with a moderate male predilection of 2:1 2.

Renal cell carcinomas are thought to be the 8th most common adult malignancy, representing 2% of all cancers, and account for 80-90% of primary malignant adult renal neoplasms 4,7.

In some instances renal cell carcinomas are associated with 2:​

Presentation is classically described as the triad of:

  1. macroscopic hematuria: 60%

  2. flank pain: 40%

  3. palpable flank mass: 30-40%

This triad is however only found in 10-15% of patients 1,2, and increasingly the diagnosis is being made on CT for assessment of hematuria alone or as an incidental finding. The majority of cases are sporadic. In contemporary medicine, almost half of all identified renal cell carcinomas are found incidentally on imaging performed for other purposes.

Around 25% of renal cell carcinoma patients will develop a paraneoplastic syndrome 19-21:

Renal cell carcinomas arise from tubular epithelium, and encompass a number of distinct histological varieties, including 4-6:

Macroscopically, renal cell carcinomas are variable in appearance, ranging from solid and relatively homogeneous to markedly heterogeneous with areas of necrosis, cystic change, and hemorrhage 4.

Low grade, smaller tumors typically have a pseudocapsule composed of compressed and ischemic normal renal tissue. The presence of a pseudocapsule is only seen in renal cell carcinomas, renal adenomas, and oncocytomas 8.

Renal cell carcinoma is one of the more common causes of cannonball metastases to the lung.

The most widely used and most predictive histological nuclear grading system for renal cell carcinoma is the "Fuhrman nuclear grade". An alternative nuclear grading system is the "International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading classification". Both these systems grade tumors on a scale of 1-4, where grade 1 carries the best prognosis and grade 4 the worst.

Imaging is essential in accurately staging renal cell carcinomas (see renal cell carcinoma staging (TNM) and Robson staging system) and in operative planning.

Although ultrasound is very frequently requested to assess the renal tract, it is not as sensitive or specific as CT or MRI. Furthermore, it struggles to accurately locally stage the disease in many instances 4.

Renal cell carcinoma has a widely varying sonographic appearance. It may appear solid or partially cystic and may be hyper-, iso-, or hypoechoic to the surrounding renal parenchyma 22. The tumor pseudocapsule can sometimes be visualized with ultrasound as a hypoechoic halo. Although this is a relatively specific sign, it is not particularly sensitive (~20%). The use of harmonic scanning has been reported to increase sensitivity to up to 85% 8.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound 16 typically shows a lesion heterogeneously hypervascular in the arterial phase with early washout in the delayed phase.

CT is frequently used to both diagnose and stage renal cell carcinomas.

On non-contrast CT, lesions are of soft tissue attenuation between 20-70 HU 23,24. Larger lesions frequently have areas of necrosis. Approximately 30% demonstrate some calcification 7.

During the corticomedullary phase of enhancement, 25-70 seconds after administration of contrast, renal cell carcinomas demonstrate variable enhancement, usually less than the normal cortex. Small lesions may enhance a similar amount and can be difficult to detect 7. In general small lesions enhance homogeneously, whereas larger lesions have irregular enhancement due to areas of necrosis. The clear cell subtype may show much stronger enhancement 5.

The corticomedullary phase is also best for assessing vascular anatomy, both for renal vein involvement, and for arterial variation if partial nephrectomy is being contemplated 7. Intraluminal growth into the venous circulation, in particular, the renal vein, occurs in 4-15% 12. The prognosis is significantly worse for those with IVC involvement compared to renal vein involvement alone, making identification on CT important 13.

The nephrogenic phase (80-180 seconds) is the most sensitive phase for detection of abnormal contrast enhancement.

Excretory phase is of less worth, but important in assessing the collecting system anatomy especially if the patient is a potential candidate for partial nephrectomy.

Follow-up imaging after treatment is typically done with CT, with dual-phase imaging of the abdomen advocated to maximize the detection of solid organ metastases 9. Renal cell carcinoma typically causes hypervascular metastases, best appreciated on arterial phase imaging of the upper abdomen.

MRI is not only excellent at imaging the kidneys and locally staging tumors, but is also able to suggest the likely histology, on the grounds of T2 differences.

  • T1: often heterogeneous due to necrosis, hemorrhage, and solid components

  • T2: appearances depend on histology 6

    • clear cell renal cell carcinoma: hyperintense

    • papillary renal cell carcinoma: hypointense

  • T1 C+ (Gd): often shows prompt arterial enhancement

The tumor pseudocapsule, essentially only seen in low-grade renal cell carcinomas, renal adenomas, and oncocytomas, appears as a hypointense rim between the tumor and the adjacent normal renal parenchyma 8.

MRI is also useful for imaging renal vein and IVC tumor thrombus and the rostral extension (important in preoperative planning). The presence of enhancement in the thrombus is able to distinguish between bland and tumor thrombus 4.

The use of diffusion-weighted sequences has been explored in assisting with characterizing indeterminate small renal lesions, which may be inflammatory or malignant in nature, both exhibit restricted diffusion, albeit the restriction is greater with an abscess than a tumor 10.

Unlike many other malignancies, FDG-PET may have limited value in primary renal carcinoma mostly as a result of physiological excretion of FDG from the kidneys, which decreases contrast between renal lesions and normal tissue, and may obscure or mask the lesions of the kidneys 32.  However certain publications suggest it can effectively be used for postoperative surveillance and restaging as an adjunct when conventional imaging is not conclusive and in some situations such as differentiating benign or bland emboli from tumor emboli 32.

Treatment of renal cell carcinomas is usually with radical nephrectomy if feasible. However, in elderly patients or those with co-morbidities, and especially those with smaller tumors suggestive of papillary histology (see MRI findings above) then organ-sparing treatment can be entertained. This ranges from adrenal sparing nephrectomy to partial nephrectomy, performed both open or laparoscopically. Additionally, percutaneous radiofrequency, chemical or cryoablation (typically under CT guidance), which can be carried out with only local anesthetic and sedation, has been introduced in selected cases 11.

Prognosis varies depending on both the histological subtype and stage.

The chromophobe subtype carries the best prognosis 35 with an overall 5-year survival rate of 78-100%, followed by the papillary subtype (>80%). Clear cell (conventional) renal cell carcinoma carries a 5-year survival of 50-70%. The collecting duct subtype is extremely aggressive and carries a 2-year survival rate of 70% 6,35.

As far as the effects of tumor stage (see renal cell carcinoma staging) are concerned, there is a dramatic difference between stage I and IV tumors:

  • stage I: 90% 5-year survival

  • stage II: 50% 5-year survival

  • stage III: 30% 5-year survival

  • stage IV: 5% 5-year survival

Approximately one-third of newly diagnosed cases of renal cell carcinomas have metastatic disease at the time of initial presentation (synchronous metastases) 30. The most common sites of metastasis are, in order, the lungs, bones, lymph nodes, liver, adrenals, and brain 25.

The broad differential is essentially that of all renal masses, particularly other renal tumors, and most commonly includes:

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Cases and figures

  • Figure 1: gross pathology - renal cell carcinoma
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 1
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Figure 2: expansile tumor with renal vein invasion
    Drag here to reorder.
  •  Case 2
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Figure 3: gross pathology - cystic renal cell carcinoma
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 3
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Figure 4: gross pathology - papillary renal cell carcinoma
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 4
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Figure 5: histology
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 5
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 6
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 7
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 8
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 9: multicystic RCC
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 10: clear cell - with horseshoe kidney
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 11: papillary type
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 12: papillary
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 13: with breast metastases
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 14: with renal vein invasion
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 15: recurrent renal cell carcinoma
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 16: solid hypovascular - papillary type I
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 17: with para-aortic nodal recurrence
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 18: with lung metastases
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 19: with hypervascular mesenteric secondaries
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 20
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 21
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 22
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 23
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 24: clear cell
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 25: with lung metastases
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 26
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 27: in a horseshoe kidney
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 28: with left varicocele formation
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 29: with ring calcification
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 30: spontaneous rupture of renal cell carcinoma
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 31
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 32
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 33: cystic
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 34
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 35
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 36
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 37: in horseshoe kidney
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 38
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 39
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 40
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 41
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 42
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 43
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 44
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 45
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 46
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 47: extending to the renal vein and inferior vena cava
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 48: metastatic
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 49: with synchronous urinary bladder cancer
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 50
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 51: metastatic
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 52
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 53
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 54
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 55
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 56
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 57
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 58: cystic renal cell carcinoma
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 59: with vascular extension
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 60: with collecting system involvement
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 61: with vascular extension
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 62: with collecting system involvement
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 63
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 64: papillary renal cell carcinoma in a patient with acute appendicitis
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 65: in a patient with colonic diverticulitis
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 66
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 67
    Drag here to reorder.
  • Case 68
    Drag here to reorder.