The RENAL nephrometry scoring system is one of many nephrotomy scoring systems 4. It was developed to categorise renal masses into low, intermediate, and high complexity and was originally developed for renal masses based on MDCT features utilising a CT IVU protocol but can also be calculated from MRI features 1-3.
On this page:
Usage
Its purpose is to aid decision-making, patient counselling, surgical planning, patient follow-up, and academic reporting 1-3.
Classification
RENAL is an easy-to-remember mnemonic of the five features scored as follows 1-3:
-
Radius (maximum diameter) in centimetres (cm) in any axis:
≤4: 1 point
4-7: 2 points
≥7: 3 points
-
Exophytic/endophytic tumour location:
≥50% exophytic: 1 point
<50% exophytic: 2 points
100% endophytic: 3 points
-
Nearness to the renal collecting system or renal sinus measured in millimetres (mm) as the shortest distance from the deepest point of the tumour:
≥7: 1 point
4-7: 2 points
≤4: 3 points
-
Anterior or posterior location - assessed on the axial view:
no points are allocated
descriptors: “a” (anterior), “p” (posterior) or “x” (neither)
-
Location relative to the renal poles
entirely below the inferior pole or above the superior pole: 1 point
mass crosses the polar line: 2 points
>50% of mass lies across the polar line or is entirely between the polar lines or crosses the axial midline: 3 points
h: assigned as a suffix if the mass touches the main renal artery or vein
Nephrometry score grading
score of 4-6: low complexity
score of 7-9: moderate complexity
score of 10-12: high complexity
History and etymology
Alexander Kutikov and Robert G Uzzo, American urologists working at Temple University School of Medicine, in Philadelphia, USA, published their scoring system in 2009 3.
External links
If any of these links are broken or for other problems and questions, please contact editors@radiopaedia.org.