Standard uptake value
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Ki Yap had no recorded disclosures.View Ki Yap's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Daniel J Bell had no recorded disclosures.View Daniel J Bell's current disclosures
The standard uptake value (SUV), also known as standardized uptake value, is a simple way of determining activity in PET imaging, most commonly used in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging. It is also known as the dose uptake ratio (DUR). As the name suggests it is a mathematically derived ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at a point in time C(T) and the injected dose of radioactivity per kilogram of the patient's body weight:
SUV = C(T)/[injection dose (MBq)/patient's weight (kg)]
It is used to measure response of cancers to treatment and is considered a semi-quantitative value as it is vulnerable to other sources of variabilities. The most reliable method of measuring activity levels would be to use fractional uptake rate (FUR) which is measured from blood samples. As the FUR and SUV are proportional, related to plasma clearance rate and a dimensionless initial distribution volume, careful usage of SUV is widely used over blood sampling.
SUV may be influenced by image noise, low image resolution and variable user-biased region of interest (ROI) selection. The cut off between benign and malignant lesion/nodule is in the SUV range of 2.0-2.5. PET sensitivity and specificity decreases with lesions smaller than 7 mm. Thus, continued follow-up is recommended.
It is important to note that many infectious and inflammatory processes will also have high SUV.
- 1. Lucignani G, Paganelli G, Bombardieri E. The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: a clinical perspective. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25 (7): 651-6. Nucl Med Commun (link) - Pubmed citation
- 2. Hamberg LM, Hunter GJ, Alpert NM et-al. The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification?. J. Nucl. Med. 1994;35 (8): 1308-12. Pubmed citation
- 3. Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2001;27 (7): 643-6. Pubmed citation
- 4. Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS et-al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J. Nucl. Med. 2004;45 (9): 1519-27. Pubmed citation
- 5. Thie JA. Clarification of a fractional uptake concept. J. Nucl. Med. 1995;36 (4): 711-2. Pubmed citation
- 6. Thie JA. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J. Nucl. Med. 2004;45 (9): 1431-4. J. Nucl. Med. (full text) - Pubmed citation