Suspicious breast calcifications
Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Yuranga Weerakkody had no recorded disclosures.View Yuranga Weerakkody's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Daniel J Bell had no recorded disclosures.View Daniel J Bell's current disclosures
Suspicious breast calcifications are calcifications within the breast that have a morphology and/or distribution on mammography indicating a significant probability of malignancy. These merit further workup and biopsy 1.
Some calcifications may be more conspicuous on digital breast tomosynthesis rather than 2D mammography 2. The advent of digital mammography likely enhanced the screening detection of calcification-related breast cancers compared to analog film mammography 4.
On diagnostic evaluation, additional spot magnification views should be obtained to confirm the morphology and number of calcifications.
In general, suspicious calcifications tend to be smaller and less regular than typically benign calcifications 1,2.
The BI-RADS 5th edition lexicon includes four descriptors of suspicious calcification morphology on mammography, which are listed in order of increasing suspicion 1,3:
- coarse heterogeneous: irregular, generally 0.5-1 mm
- amorphous: indistinct and/or small ("powdery", "cloud", or "cottony"), such that another specific shape cannot be determined
- fine pleomorphic: variable shape ("shards of glass" or "crushed stone"), generally <0.5 mm
- fine linear or fine-linear branching: thin (<0.5 mm), linear, branching or irregularly arranged ("casting")
These can be combined with descriptors of calcification distribution (besides diffuse, which is almost always benign), which are listed in increasing order of suspicion 1:
- regional: scattered in a larger volume (>2 cm in greatest linear dimension) of breast tissue and not in the expected ductal distribution
- grouped: a cluster of at least 5 calcifications within 1 cm from each other, in an area at most 2 cm in greatest linear dimension
- linear: calcifications arrayed in a line suggestive of deposition along ducts
- segmental: calcium deposits in ducts and branches of a segment or lobe
In other words, for suspicious morphologies, a linear or segmental distribution more strongly increase the probability of malignancy than does a group.
Although not an inherently suspicious morphology, punctate calcifications can be suspicious if they are new, increased, or linear or segmental in distribution 1.
Suspicious calcifications identified on screening mammography should be assessed BI-RADS 0 to indicate the patient should be recalled for additional views.
At diagnostic mammography, suspicious calcifications are categorized as BI-RADS 4. If there is a combination of findings that is highly suggestive of malignancy (e.g. fine linear and branching calcifications in segmental distribution, or microcalcifications associated with a spiculated mass), then a BI-RADS 5 assessment may be appropriate.
Amorphous calcifications are usually suspicious (BI-RADS 4) unless they are bilateral and diffuse and/or stable for many years. A single group of coarse heterogeneous, amorphous, or fine pleomorphic calcifications are moderately suspicious (BI-RADS 4B), whereas fine linear or fine-linear branching calcifications are highly suspicious (BI-RADS 4C) 1,4-9.
- 1. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013. ISBN:155903016X. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 2. Horvat JV, Keating DM, Rodrigues-Duarte H, Morris EA, Mango VL. Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques. (2019) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 39 (2): 307-318. doi:10.1148/rg.2019180124 - Pubmed
- 3. Arancibia PL, Taub T, López A,Díaz ML, Sáez C. Breast calcifications: description and classification according to BI-RADS 5th Edition. (2016) Rev Chil Radiol. 22 (2): 80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rchira.2016.06.004
- 4. Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E, Hungermann D, Böcker W, Heindel W. Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers?. (2010) Radiology. 255 (3): 738-45. doi:10.1148/radiol.10091173 - Pubmed
- 5. Oligane HC, Berg WA, Bandos AI, Chen SS, Sohrabi S, Anello M, Zuley ML. Grouped Amorphous Calcifications at Mammography: Frequently Atypical but Rarely Associated with Aggressive Malignancy. (2018) Radiology. 288 (3): 671-679. doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172406 - Pubmed
- 6. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. (1998) AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 171 (1): 35-40. doi:10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648759 - Pubmed
- 7. Grimm LJ, Johnson DY, Johnson KS, Baker JA, Soo MS, Hwang ES, Ghate SV. Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors. (2017) European radiology. 27 (6): 2275-2281. doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4617-7 - Pubmed
- 7. Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. (2001) Radiology. 221 (2): 495-503. doi:10.1148/radiol.2212010164 - Pubmed
- 8. Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ, Fine JP, Salkowski LR, Rubin DL, Sisney GA. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. (2007) Radiology. 242 (2): 388-95. doi:10.1148/radiol.2422052130 - Pubmed
- 9. Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Sayre JW. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. (2010) AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 194 (5): 1378-83. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3423 - Pubmed