Citation, DOI & article data
Patients are typically 50 to 70 years of age at presentation 9.
The incidence of paraneoplastic syndromes is thought to be low. At least 10 different histologic variants have been described 4. The most common subtypes are squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma 1.
The WHO classification of thymic tumors divides thymic carcinomas into the following morphological entities 10:
- squamous cell carcinomas
- squamous cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified
- basaloid carcinoma
- lymphoepithelial carcinoma
- NUT carcinoma of the thorax
- salivary gland-like carcinomas
- mucoepidermoid carcinoma
- clear cell carcinoma
- sarcomatoid carcinoma
- adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified
- low-grade papillary adenocarcinoma
- thymic carcinoma with adenoid cystic carcinoma-like features
- enteric-type adenocarcinoma
- adenosquamous carcinoma
- undifferentiated carcinoma
- thymic carcinoma, not otherwise specified
The category of thymic carcinoma NOS includes entities also known as hepatoid carcinoma, rhabdoid carcinoma, undifferentiated large cell carcinoma associated with Castleman disease-like reaction, and sebaceous carcinoma, although these fall under the same morphology code in this classification. Carcinosarcoma is a subtype of sarcomatoid carcinoma.
Useful features for differential from more benign thymic epithelial tumors include 1:
- larger 5 and highly aggressive anterior mediastinal mass
- areas of necrosis, hemorrhage, calcification, or cyst formation
- gross invasion of contiguous mediastinal structures and wide spread to involve distant intrathoracic sites
- high incidence of extrathoracic metastases
FDG PET-CT may be useful in differentiating thymic carcinoma from other thymic neoplasms, thymic hyperplasia, and normal physiologic uptake. The standardized uptake value (SUV) for thymic carcinoma is considered to be significantly greater than that for invasive or noninvasive thymoma, often with an SUV cutoff point of 5.0, thymic carcinoma can be differentiated from thymoma with reasonably high sensitivity (84.6%), specificity (92.3%), and accuracy (88.5%) 6.
Treatment and prognosis
They are often associated with a poor prognosis.
For an invasive anterior mediastinal mass lesion consider:
- 1. Quagliano P. Thymic Carcinoma: Case Reports and Review. J Thorac Imaging. 1996;11(1):66-74. - Pubmed
- 2. Bogot N & Quint L. Imaging of Thymic Disorders. Cancer Imaging. 2005;5(1):139-49. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0107 - Pubmed
- 3. Sadohara J, Fujimoto K, Müller N et al. Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Comparison of CT and MR Imaging Findings of Low-Risk Thymomas, High-Risk Thymomas, and Thymic Carcinomas. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60(1):70-9. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.003 - Pubmed
- 4. Nonaka D, Klimstra D, Rosai J. Thymic Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas: A Clinicopathologic Study of 10 Cases and Review of the Literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(11):1526-31. doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000137999.23780.2a - Pubmed
- 5. Jung K, Lee K, Han J, Kim J, Kim T, Kim E. Malignant Thymic Epithelial Tumors: CT-Pathologic Correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):433-9. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760433 - Pubmed
- 6. Nishino M, Ashiku S, Kocher O, Thurer R, Boiselle P, Hatabu H. The Thymus: A Comprehensive Review. Radiographics. 2006;26(2):335-48. doi:10.1148/rg.262045213 - Pubmed
- 7. Nasseri F & Eftekhari F. Clinical and Radiologic Review of the Normal and Abnormal Thymus: Pearls and Pitfalls. Radiographics. 2010;30(2):413-28. doi:10.1148/rg.302095131 - Pubmed
- 8. Do Y, Im J, Lee B et al. CT Findings in Malignant Tumors of Thymic Epithelium. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19(2):192-7. doi:10.1097/00004728-199503000-00005 - Pubmed
- 9. Lee J, Choe K, Kim S, Kim G, Im J, Lee J. CT Findings in Primary Thymic Carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15(3):429-33. doi:10.1097/00004728-199105000-00015 - Pubmed
- 10. Marx A, Chan J, Chalabreysse L et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Thymus and Mediastinum: What Is New in Thymic Epithelial, Germ Cell, and Mesenchymal Tumors? J Thorac Oncol. 2022;17(2):200-13. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2021.10.010 - Pubmed