Multiple attempts for biopsy were abandoned after significant hemorrhage, despite the preoperative embolization procedure. The patient eventually had a successful , uncomplicated biopsy performed. Gross pathologic specimen revealed multiple tissue fragments. On histopathologic examination, the specimen showed infiltrated nerve bundles. Immunohistochemical studies revealed That the tumor did not stain for EMA or actin. However, it was focally positive for chromogranin within the cytoplasm of the tumor cells. These findings were consistent with a tympanic paraganglioma.

Given the patient’s overall high functionality and the likely associated morbidity of surgery, radiation therapy was recommended in attempts at slowing tumor growth and reducing vascularity.

The most characteristic location of tympanic paragangliomas is lateral to the cochlear promontory. However, if the tumor is large and involves the hypotympanum, it cannot be distinguished from a tympanic paraganglioma and the term jugulotympanic applies. Our case demonstrates an exaggerated example of this dilemma with intracranial and extracranial locations.

The difficult decision regarding treatment options must be made with careful consideration of the associated morbidities of slow tumor growth and recurrence with conservative management versus the surgical morbidities of aggressive surgical resection. Imaging is arguably the most important component of this decision-making process, with the radiologist contributing significantly to multiple aspects of the management of paragangliomas.