DCIS - discrepancy between mammography and MRI

Case contributed by Sergey Kitaev
Diagnosis certain

Presentation

No complaints, no palpable masses in the breasts. Presented for an annual check-up.

Patient Data

Age: 55 years
Gender: Female

Right breast

mammography

In the upper outer-inner quadrant there are indistinct microcalcifications grouped in a linear pattern (enlarged on the magnification view). Coarse popcorn-like calcifications in the upper outer quadrant are consistent with involute fibroadenoma. No mass lesion detected.

Conclusion: BIRADS-4a, MRI recommended

No mass lesion detected on T1 and STIR series. Nevertheless, a conspicuous high signal of the glandular tissue is noted within the right breast on STIR.

On post-contrast T1 scan with subtraction there is a large abnormally enhancing area in the upper outer quadrant. The pattern of the enhancement is heterogeneous, predominantly linear or branching, arranged in different directions, interposed with small foci of fat. A distribution like this is of regional non-mass enhancement.

Conclusion: BIRADS-4. Core biopsy was recommended

Histology report: (immunohistochemistry with antibodies to CK5/6, estrogen, calponin): intraductal proliferation with atypia; the pronounced lymphoid infiltration of stroma around the ducts (presumably, explains the shining on STIR). Within the epithelial layer the expression of CK5/6 is missed, which agreed with DCIS. Myoepithelium all of the ducts exhibits an expression of calponin that excludes the presence of the invasive component. There is a moderate expression of estrogen in the ducts without any staining gradient in the intraductal proliferation that is consistent with DCIS.
Conclusion: pTis, DCIS, Grade 2.

Case Discussion

The discrepancy consists of the different volume of abnormality detected on the mammography and MRI where the former underestimates the extent of disease.

How to use cases

You can use Radiopaedia cases in a variety of ways to help you learn and teach.

Creating your own cases is easy.