Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Ayush Goel had no recorded disclosures.View Ayush Goel's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Laurens De Cocker had no recorded disclosures.View Laurens De Cocker's current disclosures
Monro-Kellie hypothesis is a pressure-volume relationship that aims to keep a dynamic equilibrium among the essential non-compressible components inside the rigid compartment of the skull 1-3.
The average intracranial volume in the adult is around 1700 mL, composed of brain tissue (~1400 mL), CSF (~150 mL), and blood (~150 mL) 3,4. The volume of these three components remains nearly constant in a state of dynamic equilibrium (figures 1 and 2). Thus, a decrease in one component should be compensated by the increase in other and vice-a-versa (figures 3, 4 and 5).
It is important to note that most of the blood in the cranial cavity is contained in the low-pressure venous system, so venous compression serves as a means of displacing blood volume 2.
There are many classic brain imaging findings that this theoretical hypothesis can explain:
- venous distention in intracranial hypotension
- sulcal effacement in brain edema or expansive lesion
- brain shift with intracranial hypertension
History and etymology
Named after Alexander Monro (1733-1817), a Scottish physician, and George Kellie, a Scottish surgeon (1720–1779).
- 1. Mokri B. The Monro-Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion. Neurology. 2001;56 (12): 1746-8. Neurology (full text) - doi:10.1212/WNL.56.12.1746 - Pubmed citation
- 2. Hannon RA, Pooler C, Porth CM. Porth Pathophysiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2009) ISBN:1605477818. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 3. Hickey JV. Clinical Practice of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2011) ISBN:1451161018. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 4. Rangel-Castilla L, Rangel-Castillo L, Gopinath S et-al. Management of intracranial hypertension. Neurol Clin. 2008;26 (2): 521-41, x. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2008.02.003 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation