Atypical lipomatous tumour / well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS)

Changed by Henry Knipe , 26 Jan 2022

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) or atypical lipomatous tumours (ALT) are locally aggressive adipocytic soft tissue neoplasms and are the most common form of liposarcomas.

Terminology

Atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLPS) are also termed ‘atypical lipomas’, but this term has been discouraged 1.

Epidemiology

Atypical lipomatous tumours or well-differentiated liposarcomas account for 40-45% of liposarcomas and constitute the largest subgroup of adipocyte malignancies. They occur mostly in adults with a peak incidence in the 30s and 40s. In childhood, they are extremely rare. Inguinal lesions are more common in men otherwise there is no gender predominance however 1-3.

Associations

Atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas may be associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of well-differentiated liposarcoma is based on typical pathological features.

Diagnostic criteria

Diagnostic criteria according to the WHO classification of soft tissue tumours (blue book) differ with the subtype 1:

  • lipoma-like subtype:
    • varying sizes of adipose cells
    • nuclear atypia in adipose or stromal cells
  • sclerosing subtype:
    • bizarre hyperchromatic stromal cells in a fibrillary collagenous stroma
  • inflammatory subtype:
    • atypical stromal cells in a chronic inflammatory infiltrate

    The following criteria are described as desirable in challenging cases 1:

    • MDM2 and/or CDK4 nuclear expression
    • MDM2 and/or CDK4 gene amplification

    Clinical presentation

    The most common presentation is that of a painless mass. Deep-seated atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas are most often found incidentally 1.

    Complications

    If left untreated atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas can dedifferentiate into higher-grade malignancies such as dedifferentiated liposarcoma or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma 1-4.

    Pathology

    Atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas are adipocytic neoplasms characterized by a proliferation of pleomorphic mature adipocytes of different patterns featuring atypical hyperchromatic stromal cells. They are intersected by fibrous septa, might have myxoid or fibrous components and areas of fat necrosis 1-4.

    Location

    Atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas commonly involve the deep soft tissues in particular of the proximal extremities and the trunk 1-5.

    Common locations include the following 1:

    Rarer locations of involvement include the following 1:

    Classification

    Atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas include the following subtypes 1-4,6:

    • lipoma-like liposarcoma
    • sclerosing liposarcoma
    • inflammatory liposarcoma
    Macroscopic appearance

    Macroscopically atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas usually present as well-circumscribed, large lobulated masses of variable consistency and white to yellowish colour. They might display foci of necrosis or small punctate haemorrhages 1.

    Microscopic appearance

    The microscopic appearance of atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas includes the following features. Larger tumours and especially retroperitoneal tumours commonly show more than one morphologic pattern within the same lesion1,4:

    • presence of atypical hyperchromatic stromal cells
    • variable number of lipoblasts
    • possibly variations in adipocyte size with nuclear atypia (lipoma-like subtype)
    • possibly copious inflammatory infiltrates (inflammatory subtype)
    • possibly bizarre stromal cells within a fibrillary sclerotic, collagenous background (sclerosing subtype)
    Immunophenotype

    Immunohistochemistry stains are usually positive MDM2 and/or CDK4 1.

    Genetics

    The pathogenesis of atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas involves MDM2 and/or CDK4 nuclear gene amplification 1,2.

    Radiographic features

    Imaging features of atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas resemble that of benign lipomas as discussed in the article lipoma vs well-differentiated liposarcoma and include 3-5:

    • size >5 cm
    • thick or nodular septa (>2 mm) with possible enhancement
    • multinodular tumour margins
    • focal nodular patchy non-fatty tissue components
    • more than 3/4 of fatty tissue

    They might displace other organs or tissue.

    Ultrasound

    Usually appears as multilobulated well-defined mass sometimes with hyperechoic foci 3.

    CT

    CT usually shows a fat tissue density mass with thick or nodular enhancing septae. Calcifications might be rarely found 4.   

    MRI

    On MRI atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas will display a mass of fat isointense signal in all sequences. In addition, atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas will show thick septa or nodular non-lipomatous areas with contrast enhancement 3-5.

    • T1: hyperintense
    • T2: hyperintense possibly with prominent high signal foci
    • T2FS/PDFS: hypointense
    • T1 C+ (Gd): moderate to markedenhancement of septa

    Radiology report

    The radiological report should include a description of the following 5:

    • form, location and size
    • tumour margins
    • thick septa and septal enhancement
    • amount of non-adipose tissue
    • distance from the muscular fascia
    • relationship to local nerves and vessels 

    Treatment and prognosis

    The management of choice in atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas is resection, which is curative if complete 1. The tumours are not sensitive to radiotherapy or chemotherapy 2. Tumour prognosis is therefore mostly dependent on how amenable the location is to surgical excision. The tumour does not cause distant metastasis unless there is dedifferentiation. Therefore tumours of the mediastinum retroperitoneum or spermatic cord have a worse prognosis, due to their location they are more prone to local recurrence 1,2.

    Differential diagnosis

    Conditions or tumours which can mimic the presentation and/or the appearance of atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas include 1-5:

    See also

References changed:

  • 1. Sbaraglia M, Dei Tos AP, Pedetour F. Well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumour. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 3). <a href="https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours/Soft-Tissue-And-Bone-Tumours-2020">https://publications.iarc.fr</a>
  • 2. Lee A, Thway K, Huang P, Jones R. Clinical and Molecular Spectrum of Liposarcoma. JCO. 2018;36(2):151-9. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.74.9598">doi:10.1200/jco.2017.74.9598</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220294">Pubmed</a>
  • 3. Murphey M, Arcara L, Fanburg-Smith J. Imaging of Musculoskeletal Liposarcoma with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25(5):1371-95. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.255055106">doi:10.1148/rg.255055106</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160117">Pubmed</a>
  • 4. Bestic J, Kransdorf M, White L et al. Sclerosing Variant of Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma: Relative Prevalence and Spectrum of CT and MRI Features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(1):154-61. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9462">doi:10.2214/ajr.12.9462</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23789670">Pubmed</a>
  • 5. Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M et al. Differential Diagnosis of Benign Peripheral Lipoma from Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma on MR Imaging:Is Comparison of Margins and Internal Characteristics Useful? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1689-94. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801689">doi:10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801689</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12760945">Pubmed</a>
  • 6. Shin N, Kim M, Chung J, Chung Y, Choi J, Park Y. The Differential Imaging Features of Fat-Containing Tumors in the Peritoneal Cavity and Retroperitoneum: The Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(3):333. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.333">doi:10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.333</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461188">Pubmed</a>
  • 1. W. H. O. Classification WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, Who Classification of Tumours Editorial. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. (2020-04-17) ISBN: 9789283245025
  • 2. Lee A, Thway K, Huang P, Jones R. Clinical and Molecular Spectrum of Liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(2):151-159. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9598">doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9598</a>
  • 3. Murphey M, Arcara L, Fanburg-Smith J. From the Archives of the AFIP: Imaging of Musculoskeletal Liposarcoma with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25(5):1371-95. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.255055106">doi:10.1148/rg.255055106</a>
  • 4. Bestic J, Kransdorf M, White L et al. Sclerosing Variant of Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma: Relative Prevalence and Spectrum of CT and MRI Features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(1):154-61. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9462">doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9462</a>
  • 5. Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M et al. Differential Diagnosis of Benign Peripheral Lipoma from Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma on MR Imaging: Is Comparison of Margins and Internal Characteristics Useful? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1689-94. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801689">doi:10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801689</a>
  • 6. Shin N, Kim M, Chung J, Chung Y, Choi J, Park Y. The Differential Imaging Features of Fat-Containing Tumors in the Peritoneal Cavity and Retroperitoneum: The Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(3):333-45. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.333">doi:10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.333</a>

Cases and figures

  • Case 1: thigh
  • Case 2: thigh
  • Case 3: thigh
  • Case 4: retroperitoneum

Imaging differential diagnosis

  • Large intermuscular lipoma
:

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.