Citation, DOI, disclosures and article data
At the time the article was created Frank Gaillard had no recorded disclosures.View Frank Gaillard's current disclosures
At the time the article was last revised Henry Knipe had the following disclosures:
- Integral Diagnostics, Shareholder (ongoing)
- Micro-X Ltd, Shareholder (ongoing)
These were assessed during peer review and were determined to not be relevant to the changes that were made.View Henry Knipe's current disclosures
An accessory navicular is a large accessory ossicle that can be present adjacent to the medial side of the navicular bone. The tibialis posterior tendon often inserts with a broad attachment into the ossicle. Most cases are asymptomatic but in a small proportion, it may cause painful tendinosis due to traction between the ossicle and the navicular. Such changes are best seen on MRI.
On this page:
the prevalence of an accessory navicular bone is ~10% (range 4-21%), although may be substantially higher (~45%) in Asian populations 9
first appears in adolescence
more common in female patients
reported bilateral prevalence is ~70% (range 50-90%)
Most of the time it is asymptomatic and found incidentally on radiographs, although medial side foot pain (accessory navicular syndrome) is the most common presenting feature of the accessory navicular bone. The pain is aggravated by walking, running and weight-bearing activities. When large, it can protrude medially and cause friction against the footwear.
An accessory navicular bone is located posterior to the posteromedial tuberosity of the tarsal navicular bone.
This classification was proposed by Geist 7 in 1914 and remains the most widely used classification system (c. 2021). The Geist classification divides these into three types:
type 1 accessory navicular bone (os tibiale externum, os naviculare secundarium)
2-3 mm sesamoid bone embedded within the distal portion of the posterior tibial tendon
no cartilaginous connection to the navicular tuberosity and may be separated from it by up to 5 mm
accounts for 30% of accessory navicular bones
type 2 accessory navicular bone (prehallux, bifurcate hallux)
accounts for ~55% (range 50-60%) of all accessory navicular bones
triangular or heart-shaped
typically measures around 12 mm
connected to the navicular tuberosity by a 1-2 mm thick layer of either fibrocartilage or hyaline cartilage
eventual osseous fusion to the navicular tuberosity may take place
type 3 accessory navicular bone
an especially prominent navicular tuberosity called a cornuate navicular
thought to represent a fused type 2 and is occasionally symptomatic as a result of painful bunion formation over the bony protuberance
Radiographs show a medial navicular eminence that is best visualized on the lateral-oblique view. Symptomatic accessory navicular bones may appear as a 'hot spot' on bone scan and on MRI bone marrow edema can be seen.
Treatment and prognosis
Acute pain can be managed by corticosteroid injection and immobilization of the foot for 2-3 weeks. For refractory cases, surgical management can be considered.
History and etymology
The accessory navicular bone and first variant of the Geist classification has been first described by the Swiss physician Gaspard (Caspar) Bauhin in 1605 6,7 the second variation by the German anatomist and pathologist Hubert von Luschka in 1858 7 and the last variant as well as the classification was described by the American orthopedic surgeon Emil Geist in 1914 7,10.
- 1. B. J. Manaster, David A. May, David G. Disler. Musculoskeletal Imaging. (2007) ISBN: 0323043615 - Google Books
- 2. Miller T, Staron R, Feldman F, Parisien M, Glucksman W, Gandolfo L. The Symptomatic Accessory Tarsal Navicular Bone: Assessment with MR Imaging. Radiology. 1995;195(3):849-53. doi:10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754020 - Pubmed
- 3. Jürgen Freyschmidt, Joachim Brossmann, Juergen Wiens et al. Borderlands of Normal and Early Pathological Findings in Skeletal Radiography. (2002) ISBN: 9781588901507 - Google Books
- 4. Richard B. Birrer, Bernard Griesemer, Mary B. Cataletto. Pediatric Sports Medicine for Primary Care. (2002) ISBN: 9780781731591 - Google Books
- 5. Choi Y, Lee K, Kang H, Kim E. MR Imaging Findings of Painful Type II Accessory Navicular Bone: Correlation with Surgical and Pathologic Studies. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5(4):274-9. doi:10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.274 - Pubmed
- 6. Abourazzak F, Shimi M, Azzouzi H, Mansouri S, El Mrini A, Harzy T. An Unusual Cause of Medial Foot Pain: The Cornuate Navicular. Eur J Rheumatol. 2015;2(1):33-4. doi:10.5152/eurjrheumatol.2014.14047 - Pubmed
- 7. Vaz A & Trippia C. Small but Troublesome: Accessory Ossicles with Clinical Significance. Radiol Bras. 2018;51(4):248-56. doi:10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0147 - Pubmed
- 8. Keles-Celik N, Kose O, Sekerci R, Aytac G, Turan A, Güler F. Accessory Ossicles of the Foot and Ankle: Disorders and a Review of the Literature. Cureus. 2017;9(11):e1881. doi:10.7759/cureus.1881 - Pubmed
- 9. Ng W, Tan T, Kam J, Mehta K. The Incidence and Anatomic Variation of Os Naviculare in a Multiethinic Asian Population. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;61(3):456-8. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2021.05.013 - Pubmed
- 10. Geist, ES. Supernumerary Bones of the Foot - A Röntgen Study of the Feet of One Hundred Normal Individuals. The American Journal of Orthopedic Surgery s2-12(3):p 403-414, January 1915.