Intraocular lens implant

Changed by Daniel J Bell, 2 Sep 2018

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Intraocular lens implants (IOLs) are used to replace the extracted lens as part of the standard surgical treatment for cataracts.

Structure The presence of a lens implant is known as pseudoaphakia.

Structure

Knowledge of the make-upstructure of an intraocular lens implant is required to ensure accurate identification on cross-sectional imaging.

Generally all intraocular lens implants are comprised of two main elements: the optic, which is the functional lens element, and the haptics (or footplates) that hold the optic in situ. The implant is generally impervious to fluids and therefore does not enhance post-contrast administration.

The first intraocular lenses were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), an inert plastic, this has now been superseded by flexible synthetic materials, e.g. acrylic and silicone (hydrogel), such that lenses are usually now folded, necessitating a smaller incision in the lens capsule, and unfolding once inside. 

Multifocal lenses are now available, precluding a requirement for additional reading glasses 3.

Radiographic features

US

On ocular ultrasound, the prosthetic lens is a hyperechoic linear/curvilinear structure lying in place of the native lens, posterior to the iris 6.

CT

The optic, the central component is visible as a thin linear hyperdensity. The haptics cannot be seen.

MRI

The optic, the central component, is visible as a thin linear hypointense structure on both T1 and T2 weighted sequences. The haptics cannot be seen.

A few of the older IOLs had platinum in their haptics which can produce susceptibility artefact, these were generally not used after the 1980s 5.

Differential diagnosis

  • aphakia 
    • thick-slice images: partial voluming from the iris superior and inferior to the pupil can produce an appearance mimicking a lens implant 1

Practical points

  • manyall intraocular lens implants are considered MRI safe up to 3 tesla 7 T field strength. A A study of 21 IOLs in 2012 found no significant torque of the implants in a 7 T MRIfield, nor any appreciable heating effect. Susceptibility artefacts may be seen with IOLs that contain platinum in their haptics 5
  • -<p><strong>Intraocular lens implants (IOLs)</strong> are used to replace the extracted <a title="lens" href="/articles/lens">lens</a> as part of the standard surgical treatment for <a href="/articles/cataract">cataracts</a>.</p><h4>Structure of a lens implant</h4><p>Knowledge of the make-up of an intraocular lens implant is required to ensure accurate identification on cross-sectional imaging.</p><p>Generally all intraocular lens implants are comprised of two main elements: the <strong>optic</strong>, which is the functional lens element, and the <strong>haptics </strong>(or footplates) that hold the optic in situ. The implant is generally impervious to fluids and therefore does not enhance post-contrast administration.</p><p>The first intraocular lenses were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), an inert plastic, this has now been superseded by flexible synthetic materials, e.g. acrylic and silicone (hydrogel), such that lenses are usually now folded, necessitating a smaller incision in the lens capsule, and unfolding once inside. </p><p>Multifocal lenses are now available, precluding a requirement for additional reading glasses <sup>3</sup>.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>CT</h5><p>The optic, the central component is visible as a thin linear hyperdensity. The haptics cannot be seen.</p><h5>MRI</h5><p>The optic, the central component, is visible as a thin linear hypointense structure on both T1 and T2 weighted sequences. The haptics cannot be seen.</p><p>A few of the older IOLs had platinum in their haptics which can produce susceptibility artefact, these were generally not used after the 1980s <sup>5</sup>.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><ul><li>
  • +<p><strong>Intraocular lens implants (IOLs)</strong> are used to replace the extracted <a href="/articles/crystalline-lens">lens</a> as part of the standard surgical treatment for <a href="/articles/cataract">cataracts</a>. The presence of a lens implant is known as <strong>pseudoaphakia</strong>.</p><h4>Structure</h4><p>Knowledge of the structure of an intraocular lens implant is required to ensure accurate identification on cross-sectional imaging.</p><p>Generally all intraocular lens implants are comprised of two main elements: the <strong>optic</strong>, which is the functional lens element, and the <strong>haptics </strong>(or <strong>footplates</strong>) that hold the optic in situ. The implant is generally impervious to fluids and therefore does not enhance post-contrast administration.</p><p>The first intraocular lenses were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), an inert plastic, this has now been superseded by flexible synthetic materials, e.g. acrylic and silicone (hydrogel), such that lenses are usually now folded, necessitating a smaller incision in the lens capsule, and unfolding once inside. </p><p>Multifocal lenses are now available, precluding a requirement for additional reading glasses <sup>3</sup>.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>US</h5><p>On ocular ultrasound, the prosthetic lens is a hyperechoic linear/curvilinear structure lying in place of the native lens, posterior to the iris <sup>6</sup>.</p><h5>CT</h5><p>The optic, the central component is visible as a thin linear hyperdensity. The haptics cannot be seen.</p><h5>MRI</h5><p>The optic, the central component, is visible as a thin linear hypointense structure on both T1 and T2 weighted sequences. The haptics cannot be seen.</p><p>A few of the older IOLs had platinum in their haptics which can produce susceptibility artefact, these were generally not used after the 1980s <sup>5</sup>.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><ul><li>
  • -</li></ul><h4>Practical points</h4><ul><li>many intraocular lens implants are considered MRI safe up to <a href="/articles/ultra-high-field-mri">7 T field strength</a>. A study of 21 IOLs in 2012 found no significant torque of the implants in a 7 T MRI, nor any appreciable heating effect. Susceptibility artefacts may be seen with IOLs that contain platinum in their haptics <sup>5</sup>. </li></ul>
  • +</li></ul><h4>Practical points</h4><ul><li>all intraocular lens implants are considered MRI safe up to 3 tesla <sup>7</sup>. A study of 21 IOLs in 2012 found no significant torque of the implants in a <a href="/articles/ultra-high-field-mri">7 T field</a>, nor any appreciable heating effect. Susceptibility artefacts may be seen with IOLs that contain platinum in their haptics <sup>5</sup>. </li></ul>

References changed:

  • 6. Lorente-Ramos RM, Armán JA, Muñoz-Hernández A, Gómez JM, de la Torre SB. US of the eye made easy: a comprehensive how-to review with ophthalmoscopic correlation. (2012) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 32 (5): E175-200. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.325115105">doi:10.1148/rg.325115105</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977037">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 7. Reiter MJ, Schwope RB, Kini JA, York GE, Suhr AW. Postoperative imaging of the orbital contents. (2015) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 35 (1): 221-34. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.351140008">doi:10.1148/rg.351140008</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25590399">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.