Marshall classification of traumatic brain injury
Updates to Article Attributes
The Marshall classification of traumatic brain injury is a CT scan derived metric using only a few features, and has been shown to predict outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury.
This system was first published in 1992 1 building on findings from a large cohort of head injury cases described in 1990 2, and at the time of writing (June 2016) remains one of most commonly used systems for grading acute traumatic brain injury on the basis of CT findings. The Rotterdam score is a more recent system, which attempts to address some of the recognised limitations of the Marshall system, such as struggling to classifying patients who have injuries of multiple types 3-5.
Structure
The Marshal system places patients into one of 6six categories (I to VI) of increasing severity (decreased prognosis and survival) on the basis of findings on non-contrast CT scan of the brain. It is primarily concerned with two features:
- degree of swelling, as determined by A) midline shift and/or B) compression of basal cisterns
- presence and size of contusions/haemorrhages (referred to "high or mixed density lesions"
Classification
-
diffuse injury I (no visible pathology)
- no visible intracranial pathology
-
diffuse injury II
- midline shift of 0 to
5mm5 mm - basal cisterns remain visible
- no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >
;25cm;25 cm3
- midline shift of 0 to
-
diffuse injury III (swelling)
- midline shift of 0 to
5mm5 mm - basal cisterns compressed or completely effaced
- no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >
;25cm;25 cm3
- midline shift of 0 to
-
diffuse injury IV (shift)
- midline shift >
5mm5mm - no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >
;25cm;25 cm3
- midline shift >
-
evacuated mass lesion V
- any lesion evacuated surgically
-
non-evacuated mass lesion
VVI- no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >
;25cm;25 cm3 - not surgically evacuated
- no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >
-<p>The <strong>Marshall classification of traumatic brain injury</strong> is a CT scan derived metric using only a few features, and has been shown to predict outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. </p><p>This system was first published in 1992 <sup>1</sup> building on findings from a large cohort of head injury cases described in 1990 <sup>2</sup>, and at the time of writing (June 2016) remains one of most commonly used systems for grading acute traumatic brain injury on the basis of CT findings. The <a href="/articles/rotterdam-score-of-traumatic-brain-injury">Rotterdam score</a> is a more recent system, which attempts to address some of the recognised limitations of the Marshall system, such as struggling to classifying patients who have injuries of multiple types <sup>3-5</sup>. </p><h4>Structure</h4><p>The Marshal system places patients into one of 6 categories (I to VI) of increasing severity (decreased prognosis and survival) on the basis of findings on non-contrast CT scan of the brain. It is primarily concerned with two features: </p><ol>- +<p>The <strong>Marshall classification of traumatic brain injury</strong> is a CT scan derived metric using only a few features, and has been shown to predict outcome in patients with <a href="/articles/traumatic-brain-injury">traumatic brain injury</a>. </p><p>This system was first published in 1992 <sup>1</sup> building on findings from a large cohort of head injury cases described in 1990 <sup>2</sup>, and at the time of writing (June 2016) remains one of most commonly used systems for grading acute traumatic brain injury on the basis of CT findings. The <a href="/articles/rotterdam-score-of-traumatic-brain-injury">Rotterdam score</a> is a more recent system, which attempts to address some of the recognised limitations of the Marshall system, such as struggling to classifying patients who have injuries of multiple types <sup>3-5</sup>. </p><h4>Structure</h4><p>The Marshal system places patients into one of six categories (I to VI) of increasing severity (decreased prognosis and survival) on the basis of findings on non-contrast CT scan of the brain. It is primarily concerned with two features: </p><ol>
-<li>midline shift of 0 to 5mm</li>- +<li>midline shift of 0 to 5 mm</li>
-<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25cm<sup>3</sup>- +<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25 cm<sup>3</sup>
-<li>midline shift of 0 to 5mm</li>- +<li>midline shift of 0 to 5 mm</li>
-<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25cm<sup>3</sup>- +<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25 cm<sup>3</sup>
-<li>midline shift > 5mm</li>-<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25cm<sup>3</sup>- +<li>midline shift > 5mm</li>
- +<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25 cm<sup>3</sup>
-<strong>non-evacuated mass lesion V</strong><ul>-<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25cm<sup>3</sup>- +<strong>non-evacuated mass lesion VI</strong><ul>
- +<li>no high or mixed density lesions (contusions) >25 cm<sup>3</sup>
-</ul><p> </p><p> </p>- +</ul>
Tags changed:
- cases
Sections changed:
- Classifications