Modified Boston criteria for cerebral amyloid angiopathy (historical)

Changed by Rohit Sharma, 30 Oct 2016

Updates to Article Attributes

Title was changed:
Modified bostonBoston criteria for cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Body was changed:

The Modified Boston criteria were proposed in 2010 in order to incorporate cortical superficial siderosis into the radiological diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) 1. They comprise of combined clinical, imaging and pathological parameters, and are based upon the original Boston criteria which were proposed in 1995 2

The criteria are divided into four tiers and are as 1:

  • definite cerebral amyloid angiopathy:
    • full post-mortem examination reveals lobar, cortical, or cortical/subcortical haemorrhage and pathological evidence of severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy
  • probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy with supporting pathological evidence:
    • clinical data and pathological tissue (evacuated haematoma or cortical biopsy specimen) demonstrate a haemorrhage as mentioned above and some degree of vascular amyloid deposition
    • doesn't have to be post-mortem
  • probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy:
    • pathological confirmation not required
    • patient 55 years or older
    • appropriate clinical history 
    • MRI findings demonstrate:
      • multiple haemorrhages restricted to lobar, cortical, or corticosubcortical regions (cerebellar haemorrhages allowed) of varying sizes/ages without another cause, or
      • a single lobar, cortical, or corticosubcortical haemorrhage and focal (three of less sulci) or disseminated (more than three sulci) cortical superficial siderosis without another cause
  • possible cerebral amyloid angiopathy
    • patient 55 years or older
    • appropriate clinical history 
    • MRI findings demonstrate:
      • a single lobar, cortical, or corticosubcortical haemorrhage without another cause, or
      • focal or disseminated cortical superficial siderosis without another cause

The Modified Boston criteria for diagnosis of probable'probable CAA' was pathologically validated in 2010, and compared to the Boston criteria, had an increase in sensitivity (95%, 95% CIconfidence interval (CI) 76% to 99%) with only a modest decrease in specificity (81%, 95% CI 62% to 93%) 1, 3.  

  • -<p>The <strong>Modified Boston criteria</strong> were proposed in 2010 in order to incorporate cortical superficial siderosis into the radiological diagnosis of <a href="/articles/cerebral-amyloid-angiopathy-1">cerebral amyloid angiopathy</a> <sup>1</sup>. They comprise of combined clinical, imaging and pathological parameters, and are based upon the original <a title="Boston criteria" href="/articles/boston-criteria-for-cerebral-amyloid-angiopathy">Boston criteria</a> which were proposed in 1995 <sup><span style="font-size:10.8333px">2</span></sup>. </p><p>The criteria are divided into four tiers and are as <sup>1</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +<p>The <strong>Modified Boston criteria</strong> were proposed in 2010 in order to incorporate cortical superficial siderosis into the radiological diagnosis of <a href="/articles/cerebral-amyloid-angiopathy-1">cerebral amyloid angiopathy</a> (CAA) <sup>1</sup>. They comprise of combined clinical, imaging and pathological parameters, and are based upon the original <a href="/articles/boston-criteria-for-cerebral-amyloid-angiopathy">Boston criteria</a> which were proposed in 1995 <sup>2</sup>. </p><p>The criteria are divided into four tiers and are as <sup>1</sup>:</p><ul>
  • -</ul><p>The Modified Boston criteria for diagnosis of probable CAA was validated in 2010, and compared to the <a href="/articles/boston-criteria-for-cerebral-amyloid-angiopathy">Boston criteria</a>, had an increase in sensitivity (95%, 95% CI 76% to 99%) with only a modest decrease in specificity (81%, 95% CI 62% to 93%) <sup>1, 3</sup>.  </p>
  • +</ul><p>The Modified Boston criteria for diagnosis of 'probable CAA' was pathologically validated in 2010, and compared to the <a href="/articles/boston-criteria-for-cerebral-amyloid-angiopathy">Boston criteria</a>, had an increase in sensitivity (95%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 76% to 99%) with only a modest decrease in specificity (81%, 95% CI 62% to 93%) <sup>1, 3</sup>.  </p>

References changed:

  • 1. Linn J, Halpin A, Demaerel P et-al. Prevalence of superficial siderosis in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology. 2010;74 (17): 1346-50. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dad605">doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dad605</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875936">Free text at pubmed</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20421578">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
  • 2. Greenberg SM, Rebeck GW, Vonsattel JP et-al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 and cerebral hemorrhage associated with amyloid angiopathy. Ann. Neurol. 1995;38 (2): 254-9. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380219">doi:10.1002/ana.410380219</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7654074">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
  • 3. van Rooden S, van der Grond J, van den Boom R et-al. Descriptive analysis of the Boston criteria applied to a Dutch-type cerebral amyloid angiopathy population. Stroke. 2009;40 (9): 3022-7. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.554378">doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.554378</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19556530">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>

Systems changed:

  • Central Nervous System

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.