MRI classification system for lumbar disc degeneration

Changed by Henry Knipe, 25 Aug 2021

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Disc degeneration can be graded on MRI T2 spin-echo weighted images using a.

Usage

The Pfirrmann grading system proposed byis the most widely known classification for intervertebral disc degeneration and is used in both clinical and research capabilities 2,3. The intra- and inter-observer agreement of the Pfirrmann 1. This classificationgrading system is not used on routine spine reports, being more important for research purposesexcellent 3.

Classification

Pfirrmann grading system
  • grade I: disc is homogeneous with bright hyperintense white signal intensity and normal disc height
  • grade II
    • disc is inhomogeneous, but keeping the hyperintense white signal
    • nucleus and annulus are clearly differentiated, and a gray horizontal band could be present
    • disc height is normal
  • grade III
    • disc is inhomogeneous with an intermittent gray signal intensity
    • distinction between nucleus and annulus is unclear
    • disc height is normal or slightly decreased
  • grade IV
    • disc is inhomogeneous with a hypointense dark gray signal intensity
    • there is no more distinction between the nucleus and annulus
    • disc height is slightly or moderately decreased
  • grade V
    • disc is inhomogeneous with a hypointense black signal intensity
    • there is no more difference between the nucleus and annulus
    • the disc space is collapsed
Modified Pfirrman grading system

A modified classification was proposed in 2007 by Griffith et al. 2 to better categorise degenerative discs in older patients where most discs are Pfirrman grade III or IV.

  • grade 1
    • uniformly hyperintense, equal to CSF
    • distinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • normal disc height
  • grade 2
    • hyperintense (between presacral fat and CSF) +/- hypointense intranuclear cleft
    • distinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • normal disc height
  • grade 3
    • hyperintense (less than presacral fat)
    • distinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • normal disc height
  • grade 4
    • midly hyperintense (slightly more than outer annular fibres)
    • indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • normal disc height
  • grade 5
    • hypointense (equal to outer annular fibres)
    • indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • normal disc height
  • grade 6
    • hypointense
    • indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • <30% reduction in disc height
  • grade 7
    • hypointense
    • indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • 30-60% reduction in disc height
  • grade 8
    • hypointense
    • indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly
    • >60% reduction in disc height
  • -<p><strong>Disc degeneration</strong> can be graded on MRI T2 spin-echo weighted images using a grading system proposed by Pfirrmann <sup>1</sup>. This classification is not used on routine spine reports, being more important for research purposes.</p><ul>
  • +<p><strong>Disc degeneration</strong> can be graded on MRI T2 weighted images.</p><h4>Usage</h4><p>The Pfirrmann grading system is the most widely known classification for <a href="/articles/degenerative-disc-disease">intervertebral disc degeneration</a> and is used in both clinical and research capabilities <sup>2,3</sup>. The intra- and inter-observer agreement of the Pfirrmann grading system is excellent <sup>3</sup>.</p><h4>Classification</h4><h5>Pfirrmann grading system</h5><ul>
  • -<li>disc is inhomogeneous, but keeping the hyperintense white signal</li>
  • +<li>disc is inhomogeneous but keeping the hyperintense white signal</li>
  • -</ul><p>A modified classification was proposed in 2007 by Griffith et al. <sup>2</sup>.</p>
  • +</ul><h5>Modified Pfirrman grading system</h5><p>A modified classification was proposed in 2007 by Griffith et al. <sup>2</sup> to better categorise degenerative discs in older patients where most discs are Pfirrman grade III or IV. </p><ul>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 1</strong><ul>
  • +<li>uniformly hyperintense, equal to CSF</li>
  • +<li>distinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>normal disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 2</strong><ul>
  • +<li>hyperintense (between presacral fat and CSF) +/- hypointense intranuclear cleft</li>
  • +<li>distinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>normal disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 3</strong><ul>
  • +<li>hyperintense (less than presacral fat)</li>
  • +<li>distinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>normal disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 4</strong><ul>
  • +<li>midly hyperintense (slightly more than outer annular fibres)</li>
  • +<li>indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>normal disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 5</strong><ul>
  • +<li>hypointense (equal to outer annular fibres)</li>
  • +<li>indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>normal disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 6</strong><ul>
  • +<li>hypointense</li>
  • +<li>indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>&lt;30% reduction in disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 7</strong><ul>
  • +<li>hypointense</li>
  • +<li>indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>30-60% reduction in disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>grade 8</strong><ul>
  • +<li>hypointense</li>
  • +<li>indistinct junction between inner and outer annular fibres posteriorly</li>
  • +<li>&gt;60% reduction in disc height</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +</ul>

References changed:

  • 3. Urrutia J, Besa P, Campos M et al. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2728-2733. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4438-z">doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4438-z</a>

Tags changed:

  • cases

Updates to Synonym Attributes

Updates to Synonym Attributes

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.